Hi,
See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php74
PHP 7.4.0RC3 will be announced tomorrow, and I plan to
build it in rawhide
I will also run a mass rebuild of all extensions
Ping me, I you prefer I don't rebuild some package and
you want to fix it yourself
Remi
__
On Tuesday, October 1, 2019 7:55:10 AM MST Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Then when GitHub started to take over, it is closed source and that
> was a big nono for services from Fedora developers. [AKA we move to
> Github various package owners were going to drop their packages and
> leave.]
This i
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/2 (x86_64)
ID: 461801 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/461801
Passed openQA tests: 1/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
FYI - I'm building cmake 3.15.3 in rawhide now. This is an update from
3.14.5. cmake version updates have been known to trigger build issues
in the past, so I figured it was worth a heads up.
--
Orion Poplawski
Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office
On Mon, 2019-09-30 at 18:32 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-10-01 at 00:13 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> > No missing expected images.
> >
> > Failed openQA tests: 5/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
> >
> > New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190928.n.0):
> >
> > ID: 4
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 10:05 AM Pavel Valena wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Jun Aruga"
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> > Cc: "Fedora Infrastructure"
> > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 8:27:22 PM
> > Subject: Re: 2020 D
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:06 am, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Hover on your name at the top-right, then click preferences. There's
a
tab for "Component Watching". Direct link:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=component_watch
Thanks, this works great!
___
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190930.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20191001.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 7
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 128
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 623.94 KiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 45 required tests failed, 2 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED: compose.clo
There will be an outage starting at 2019-10-2 21:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 1 hour.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-10-02 21:00 UTC'
Reason for outage:
During this outage window we plan to upgrade koji to
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 07:46:03PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01-10-2019 18:04, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:21 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >>
> >>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ThermalManagementWS
> >>
> >>== Summary ==
> >>Better thermal management and
Hi,
On 01-10-2019 18:04, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:21 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ThermalManagementWS
== Summary ==
Better thermal management and peak performance on Intel CPUs by
including thermald in the default install.
Install
With CGAL-5.0, CGAL is becoming a header-only C++ library of templates.
That means that CGAL libraries will disappear, in particular libCGAL.so.13.
--
Laurent Rineau, PhD
R&D Engineer at GeometryFactory
http://www.geometryfactory.com/
___
devel maili
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:21 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ThermalManagementWS
>
> == Summary ==
> Better thermal management and peak performance on Intel CPUs by
> including thermald in the default install.
> Install the packages and use e.g. turbostat to monit
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 11:54 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 05:38:49PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 01. 10. 19 17:22, Jerry James wrote:
> > >On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:41 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > >>You should not do that, see the "Do not use noarch" part o
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 05:38:49PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 01. 10. 19 17:22, Jerry James wrote:
> >On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:41 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>You should not do that, see the "Do not use noarch" part of:
> >>
> >>https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_packag
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 10:39 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> - cmake files usually go into %{_libdir} and such packages cannot be
> noarch as well
>
Could you build the package twice using mock (x86_64 and i686) and run
rpmdiff on them to see if there's anything significant?
Thanks,
Richard
On 01. 10. 19 17:22, Jerry James wrote:
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:41 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
You should not do that, see the "Do not use noarch" part of:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_packaging_header_only_libraries
I've been meaning to bring that up. The rationa
On 01. 10. 19 17:18, Laurent Rineau wrote:
... But I have another concerned, compare to header-only C++ libraries (like
eigen3-devel): what will be the upgrade path? If I remove the main package
`CGAL` (and keep only `CGAL-devel`), nothing will provide an upgrade path from
CGAL-4.14.1-1.
I sugg
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 8:41 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> You should not do that, see the "Do not use noarch" part of:
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_packaging_header_only_libraries
I've been meaning to bring that up. The rationale for not using
noarch has two parts.
On Tuesday, October 1, 2019 4:41:29 PM CEST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 01. 10. 19 16:24, laurent.rineau__fed...@normalesup.org wrote:
>
> > Another possibility would be to switch to a noarch package, but in the
> > future I would like to package the CGAL examples and demos as
> > sub-packages.
>
>
On Tue, 1 Oct 2019 at 10:18, Joe Doss wrote:
>
> On 9/26/19 11:57 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> > I would like to hear if you see Pagure as still strategic, and if so,
> > how we can make these common user operations faster.
>
> I always wondered why Fedora home rolled their own Github/Gitlab clone.
Be
On 01. 10. 19 16:24, laurent.rineau__fed...@normalesup.org wrote:
Another possibility would be to switch to a noarch package, but in the future I
would like to package the CGAL examples and demos as sub-packages.
You should not do that, see the "Do not use noarch" part of:
https://docs.fedora
About a month ago I requested to unretire some nodejs packages in
order to get the "grunt" stack working again. At least one more
package still needs to be unretired to fix the
nodejs-grunt-contrib-watch package, nodejs-gaze:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs-gaze
This was retired just un
The CGAL project (https://www.cgal.org/) has published CGAL-5.0-beta1, that is
now a header-only library (and thus noarch), with arch-dependent dependencies
(boost, gmp, mpfr).
What is the recommended way to update the spec file ?
For the moment, I have let the CGAL package be arch-dependent, b
On 9/26/19 11:57 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
I would like to hear if you see Pagure as still strategic, and if so,
how we can make these common user operations faster.
I always wondered why Fedora home rolled their own Github/Gitlab clone.
Using either Github or Gitlab would be better for new users
Thank you! That's exactly what I needed. :-)
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 11:29 AM Akira TAGOH wrote:
>
> That may be good to check here:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 6:21 PM Ricardo Bánffy wrote:
> >
> > Slightly changing subjects, I'd like to kn
- Original Message -
> From: "Jun Aruga"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Fedora Infrastructure"
> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2019 8:27:22 PM
> Subject: Re: 2020 Datacenter Move: Request for comments
>
> > There's also a video about it from Flock 2019:
> > ht
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190930.n.1):
ID: 461095 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/461095
ID: 461096 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_
OLD: Fedora-31-20190930.n.1
NEW: Fedora-31-20191001.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 30
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 26.65 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Hi all,
since I recently submitted my package for sshguard [1] for review [2],
this is probably a good time to introduce myself (some of you might
remember me from the packaging list). I'm also looking for a sponsor,
assuming the package is positively reviewed.
I"m Christopher, 35yr old, from G
That may be good to check here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 6:21 PM Ricardo Bánffy wrote:
>
> Slightly changing subjects, I'd like to know how do people package
> fonts. I make one, that a brave soul packages for Debian distros, but
> it doesn't h
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 02:58:54PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 01:16:52PM -, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > Is this a perfectly drop-in compatible replacement from a user point of
> > > view?
> > The user that executes "grep -P"? Not many changes. Usually a corner
> > cases
On 2019-09-30, Till Hofmann wrote:
>
>
> On 9/23/19 1:42 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
>> On 2019-09-22, Till Hofmann wrote:
>>> We have an odd issue with a module build of sway for F30: It looks like
>>> the module was actually built with a F32 buildroot.
>>>
>>> BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug
On 2019-09-30, James Cassell wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019, at 9:16 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
>> On 2019-09-27, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 05:52:31PM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
>> >> == pcre -> pcre2 ==
>> >> Moving grep (one of the last packages using pcre) to pcre2. [4]
>>
35 matches
Mail list logo
