Am 19.09.19 um 19:59 schrieb Antonio Trande:
libb2-0.98.1 built
Thanks - test suite for borgbackup still passes so I think we're fine :-)
Felix
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. mutter — can't turn zoom off once enabled — NEW
ACTION: maintainers to diagnose and fix issue
2. gdm — Second user gets locked out of his session every ~10 seconds — NEW
ACTION: maintainer to diagnose and fix issue
3. gno
# F31 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2019-09-23
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have 5 proposed Final blockers and 1 proposed Final freeze
exception to review, so let's have a Fedora 31 blocker review meeting
on Monday!
If you have time today,
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting for Monday. We met the
last two weeks, and I don't think there's anything urgent right now.
There will be a blocker review meeting.
Thanks!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassas
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190919.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190920.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 157
Dropped packages:7
Upgraded packages: 100
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 2.03 GiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
3 of 45 required tests failed, 2 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Wor
On 9/19/19 10:44 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler said:
Randy Barlow wrote:
It is a disservice to our users to provide them with unmaintained
packages,
It is a disservice to our users to NOT provide them with unmaintained
packages. If, as a user, you NEED a package, you w
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019, at 8:00 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> You also have to pre-build your filesystems to have a place to copy
> the files into at installation time. If you're going to go to that
> much work, why are you bothering with yum? Why not just pre-build and
> install a base operati
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 03:09:01PM +0200, jkone...@redhat.com wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We (the Anaconda installer team) want to solve multiple problems by one
> solution and we want
>
> *YOUR FEEDBACK!*
>
>
> In short we are proposing to use custom repo files when configuring
> Anaconda fo
On 9/19/19 3:33 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 19. 09. 19 23:29, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
* Stop rawhide composes until we have a branched compose. This may
not
be needed with the change to make rawhide use 'rawhide' and not the
number, but we should consider it if we don't have a compo
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 11:41 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 9/20/19 6:07 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 7:33 PM Kaleb Keithley
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 2:18 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 9/19/19 5:26 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> Someone with privs
On 9/20/19 4:39 AM, jkone...@redhat.com wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 14:29 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On 9/18/19 1:41 AM, jkone...@redhat.com wrote:
...snip...
>>> In my F31 case most importantly copr will be in similar situation
>>> that
>>> they will use Rawhide *new* compose (if they won't
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 11:40 AM Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> I was about to update the page for this, but then I noticed that it is
> autogenerated, can someone please re-run the script which generates
> it to get this updated.
>
Updated, thanks!
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
(Note that this was orignally submitted for Fedora 28)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/mpfr-4.0.2
== Summary ==
Update the MPFR package to version 4.0.2.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:jamesturner246| James Paul Turner]]
* Email: jamesturner...@fedoraproject.org
* Name: [[User:jjames| Jerry J
Hi,
I've been taking a look at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/Prioritized_bugs_and_issues
And I think that this is a very good idea to help us
focus on important issues.
I've already fixed:
1490490 Plymouth doesn't echo LUKS keypresses or show boot progress
w
On 9/20/19 6:07 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 7:33 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 2:18 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/19/19 5:26 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
Someone with privs please kick it. Thanks
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/upd
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:27:21AM +0100, Dave Love wrote:
> (Is there a way to tell?)
virt-what !
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-p2v converts physical machines to
On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 06:53, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> my attempt to (scratch) build an EPEL 8 package failed with
>
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9259/37759259/root.log
>
> DEBUG util.py:593: Error: Error downloading packages:
> DEBUG util.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 7:33 PM Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 2:18 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>> On 9/19/19 5:26 AM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>> > Someone with privs please kick it. Thanks
>> >
>> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-995f3ae953
>>
>> Done. Do note t
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 07:11:45 -0500, Vendaval wrote:
> Welcome, Alciregi
> thanks for helping a lot.
>
> :)
>
> P.D: Can I be sponsored too?
Yes---I was going to ask you and @dan1mal about joining up to
co-maintain the packages too since you two are managing the lab lab/spin
for us :).
Will you
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190919.n.1):
ID: 455182 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/455182
Old failures (same test failed
OLD: Fedora-31-20190919.n.1
NEW: Fedora-31-20190920.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 3
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Il giorno ven 20 set 2019 alle ore 13:03 Leigh Scott
ha scritto:
>
> Shouldn't you be using system waf instead of the ancient bundled version?,
> try the waf-python3 package instead.
It's not that simple, every wscript file needs to be patched.
WAF change its API from version 1.7 (if I remember
Welcome !
And thank you very much, Ankur, for coordinating these actions :)
BR, Alain
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 1:23 PM Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just sponsored @alciregi to the packagers group.
>
> They've been around the Fedora community for a while already and have
> helped with QA
On Thu, 2019-09-19 at 14:29 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 9/18/19 1:41 AM, jkone...@redhat.com wrote:
> > Hi Kevin,
> > Thanks for the explanation. See my comments below.
>
> ...snip...
>
> > > * Stop rawhide composes until we have a branched compose. This
> > > may
> > > not
> > > be needed wit
Hello,
I've just sponsored @alciregi to the packagers group.
They've been around the Fedora community for a while already and have
helped with QA/Marketing/Join/AskFedora and lots of other things. Now,
they are also looking to help the NeuroSIG with packaging and learn the
process along the way.
Shouldn't you be using system waf instead of the ancient bundled version?, try
the waf-python3 package instead.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Con
Hello,
my attempt to (scratch) build an EPEL 8 package failed with
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9259/37759259/root.log
DEBUG util.py:593: Error: Error downloading packages:
DEBUG util.py:593:Status code: 404 for
https://infrastructure.fedoraprojec
On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 11:10:41 +0100
Dave Love wrote:
> Stephen John Smoogen writes:
>
> > It depends on what level of emulation you mean. Are you meaning "is
> > it an x86_64 acting like a aarch64?" then the answer is no.
>
> Yes, that's what I meant, thanks.
>
> > If you are
> > meaning "is i
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> On 9/19/19 3:27 AM, Dave Love wrote:
>> Are the aarch64 test systems running on real or emulated hardware? (Is
>> there a way to tell?)
>
> You mean the ones listed at
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers
> ?
Yes, apologies for no
Stephen John Smoogen writes:
> It depends on what level of emulation you mean. Are you meaning "is it
> an x86_64 acting like a aarch64?" then the answer is no.
Yes, that's what I meant, thanks.
> If you are
> meaning "is it an aarch64 guest system on an aarch64" then probably
> yes... we don't
Hi,
there are many audio related packages that depend on python2, mainly
because they use the WAF build system, which will be retired in f32 if
not ported to python3.
Porting them to python3 is not a trivial job.
Some of the most important packages are:
ardour5
jack-audio-connection-kit (next upst
On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 11:36 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> DNF does have some broken behaviors, but this isn't one of them.
I can't confirm whether this is a broken behavior but I have a strong
heuristic that I suspect would make DNF appear wrong here.
If I have RPM foo-1 installed that obsoletes b
I retired perl-Geo-Point and perl-Geo-Proj4 packages because they are
incompatible with proj-6.2.0. These two packages are not used by
anything else in Fedora.
-- Petr
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email t
34 matches
Mail list logo
