Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 02:47:20PM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > I've since run > > sudo dnf module reset eclipse > > Which results in the following error when trying a distro-sync. > > Problem: conflicting requests > - nothing provides module(eclipse) needed by module > jmc:latest:3120

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

W dniu 11.09.2019 o 14:54, Miroslav Suchý pisze: > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run [*]: > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync > > If you get this prompt: > >

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

Thanks for letting me know! On 12.09.19 10:06, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 05:18:36PM +0100, chedi toueiti wrote: Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package mono-tools-gendarme-4.2-12.fc30.x86_64 - mono-tools-gendarme-4.2-12.fc30.x86_64 does not belong

Re: "Modifying /etc/os-release for re-branding?"

Hello, If you are creating a Fedora Remix, you'll need to remove the fedora- release package, which provides the `/etc/os-release` file. fedora- logos will also need to be removed. If you want to modify and add your own /etc/os-release info, it would probably be best to create your own -release

Fedora-Rawhide-20190912.n.2 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 4 of 45 required tests failed, 2 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MISSING: fedora.Wor

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

But there should be some reason for that lack of interested volunteers in Fedora. Right now I'm looking at stats for other distributions which are not going to drop i686 any time soon, e.g. Debian, NixOS, Gentoo. There must me some very fundamental difference with how they operate. Of course one

Re: F29 liberations-fonts dependencies are messed in several packages(or it's dnf)

Marius Schwarz wrote: > (in short: no update to 2.00.5-3 was possible via dnf, as packages refer > to 2.00.3-1 directly) They don't actually refer to liberation-fonts-2.00.3-1, but to liberation- narrow-fonts, which liberation-fonts-2.00.3-1 claims to Provide, but does not actually provide. So t

Re: "Modifying /etc/os-release for re-branding?"

On 9/10/19 11:50 PM, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: > On Wed, 2019-09-11 at 09:54 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote: >> Is it ok to modify /etc/os-release for re-branding purpose? I would think so yes. There's a lot of things there that you would want to point elsehwere if you are remixing. kevin -- > >

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019, 10:24 AM Ankur Sinha, wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 10:48:51 -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote: > > - vtk-8.1.1-5.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > > There's vtk 8.2.0-6 that is already in F31 stable. So not sure what this > implies: > https://bodhi.fedor

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

On 9/12/19 1:37 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 07:12:37AM +0200, Franta Hanzlík wrote: >> On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:54:45 +0200 >> Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> >>> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time >>> and try to run [*]: >>> >>>

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

I've since run sudo dnf module reset eclipse Which results in the following error when trying a distro-sync. Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(eclipse) needed by module jmc:latest:3120190813124555:7188e41a-0.x86_64 Error: Problem: package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 re

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

Hello, I had a few problems. To clear some I had to run. sudo dnf module reset libgit2 This resulted in the rest of the errors. Modular dependency problems: Problem 1: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f

[Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta is GO

The Fedora 31 Beta RC1 compose[1] is GO and is will be shipped live on Tuesday, 17 September 2019. For more information please check the Go/No-Go meeting minutes [2] or log [3]. Thank you to everyone who has and still is working on this release! [1] https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/31_

Re: Intention to retire Release Notes RPM

Dne 02. 09. 19 v 13:57 Brian (bex) Exelbierd napsal(a): > Closing the loop: This package has been retired via `fedpkg retire` in f31 > and rawhide. Can you add it to fedora-obsolete-packages? Otherwise the old version will remain on every Fedora machine. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Associ

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

Dne 11. 09. 19 v 17:04 Solomon Peachy napsal(a): > There are a couple > of F29 stragglers left behind from the last upgrade too. Not sure what > I should file tickets about here.. If the package does not cause an issue, then it can be left behind. But it can be removed using fedora-obsolete-p

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

Dne 12. 09. 19 v 5:02 Harish Pillay napsal(a): > after adding --allowerasing to the commandline. Try it without it. The point is not to "pass it somehow", but pass it properly according documentation. If erasing is needed, then there is likely missing some obsolete somewhere. -- Miroslav Suchy,

Re: Need help: SWIG related build error for python-pivy?

On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 9:18 PM Jerry James wrote: > On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 7:53 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > > I have both SoQt and SIMVoleon buliding with it but I'm getting an error > with Pivy: > > > > + /usr/bin/python3 setup.py build '--executable=/usr/bin/python3 -s' > > running build > > BUIL

Re: Intent to unretire ladspa-swh-plugins

On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:32:45 +0100 "Ryan Walklin" wrote: > Thanks for the clarification, I hadn't realised the LV2 versions of > the plugins weren't working. I've managed to get the F29 version as > you suggest, and patched (attached) the scripts to force Python 2 so > I can run the GUI from the

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 02:57:55PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 04:37:42PM +0200, Martin Kolman wrote: > > Looks like I have something uniqe I haven't seen in the other mails, > > related to packit: > > > > $ LANG=en_US sudo dnf --releasever=31 > > --setopt

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 04:37:42PM +0200, Martin Kolman wrote: > Looks like I have something uniqe I haven't seen in the other mails, related > to packit: > > $ LANG=en_US sudo dnf --releasever=31 > --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 --enablerepo=updates-testing > distro-sync > RCM Tools

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 03:23:43PM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > So, aeskulap was orphaned. I don't even see an F31 branch somehow: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/aeskulap/branches?branchname=master > > What should be done here? > > > - dcmtk-3.6.2-4.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupg

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories

> On 11 Sep 2019, at 21:03, vvs vvs wrote: > > Yes, that's understandable. But this is beating of a dead horse. > > But what matters now is that by doing some small investigation i686 users can > still get support for their bugs which are common for both platforms. This > doesn't require any f

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

Looks like I have something uniqe I haven't seen in the other mails, related to packit: $ LANG=en_US sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync RCM Tools for Fedora 31 (RPMs) 2

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

On Thu, 12 Sep 2019, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: The third one, python3-parso, has builds for 0.5.1-2.fc30 and 0.5.1-2.fc32, but there is no 0.5.1-2 build for fc31. File a bug please. It's against the guidelines to have a higher-numbered build in F30 compared to F31. Maintainers need to

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 10:48:51 -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote: > Problem 2: package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires > libdcmdata.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package aeskulap-0.2.2-0.37.beta2.fc30.x86_64 requires > libdcmimage.so.12()(64bit), but no

Re: [Design-team] Re: Badges virtual hackfest

Forwarding to mindshare and devel lists on Marie's behalf to reach as many possible contributors who may be interested in helping out this weekend. On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 6:43 AM Marie Nordin wrote: > > Hi everybody! > > This weekend I will be running a badges virtual hackfest. We can use as muc

Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: PHP 7.4

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/php74 == Summary == Update the PHP stack in Fedora to latest version 7.4.x == Owner == * Name: Remi Collet and PHP SIG * Email: remi at fedoraproject dot org == Current status == * An testing module is available in my [https://blog.remirepo.net/post/2019/09

Fedora 31 compose report: 20190912.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-31-20190911.n.0 NEW: Fedora-31-20190912.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 8.71 MiB Size of dropped packages:55.09 MiB Size

Fedora-31-20190912.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 4/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190911.n.0): ID: 449292 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/449292 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-31-20190

Re: Intent to unretire ladspa-swh-plugins

Thanks for the clarification, I hadn't realised the LV2 versions of the plugins weren't working. I've managed to get the F29 version as you suggest, and patched (attached) the scripts to force Python 2 so I can run the GUI from the launcher. Upstream seems to have updated the GUI to Python 3, b

F29 liberations-fonts dependencies are messed in several packages(or it's dnf)

Hi, pls refer to *Bug 1751699* for more informations. (in short: no update to 2.00.5-3 was possible via dnf, as packages refer to 2.00.3-1 directly) to name some: cups flute foomatic gstreamer libreoffice tons of lib packages poppler samba

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 07:12:37AM +0200, Franta Hanzlík wrote: > On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:54:45 +0200 > Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > > and try to run [*]: > > > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=plat

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 07:14:43PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > The third one, python3-parso, has builds for 0.5.1-2.fc30 and > 0.5.1-2.fc32, but there is no 0.5.1-2 build for fc31. File a bug please. It's against the guidelines to have a higher-numbered build in F30 compared to F31. Maintainers ne

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:30:12PM -0400, Jared K. Smith wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 9:01 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > > and try to run [*]: > > > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f3

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 02:42:27PM -0400, Code Zombie wrote: > Hi > > Here's my output (I am running F30): > > Problem 1: problem with installed package eclipse-jgit-5.4.0-4.fc30.noarch > - eclipse-jgit-5.4.0-4.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - nothing provides jg

F31+ i386 chroots build against Koji buildroots [was Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal (late): No i686 Repositories]

On Tuesday, September 10, 2019 3:23:29 PM CEST Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 09. 09. 19 v 21:01 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > > The koji buildroot repo will continue to be available if you want to > > copy something, but as far as work to be done to move back to > > distributing a i686 set of trees? I gue

Re: GNOME 3.34.0 megaupdate

Hi Kalev, On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:20 AM Kalev Lember wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:16 AM Olivier Fourdan wrote: >> [...] >> >> Not sure if this is just me, but with this update, most if not all >> icons are missing. Was working fine before the update to GNOME 3.34. > > > I believe that'

Re: [EXT] Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 02:56:37PM +, Anderson, Charles R wrote: > I know you didn't ask about F29 upgrades, but it looks like it might work: Upgrades from F29 are supported too, so this check is very useful. > Install 135 Packages > Upgrade 2417 Packages > Remove 4 Packages Nice! Z

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 09:30:51AM -0500, Ron Olson wrote: > This is what I got: > > Error: > Problem 1: package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 requires > libIlmImf-2_2.so.22()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > installed > - OpenEXR-libs-2.2.0-16.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a > distupg

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 05:18:36PM +0100, chedi toueiti wrote: > Error: > Problem 1: problem with installed package > mono-tools-gendarme-4.2-12.fc30.x86_64 > - mono-tools-gendarme-4.2-12.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - nothing provides mono(ICSharpCode.SharpZipLi

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:10:41AM -0400, Steven A. Falco wrote: > On 9/11/19 8:54 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > > and try to run [*]: > > > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > > --enab

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:51:42PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:48:51AM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:16:28PM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > > > > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your > > > > time and

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

On 9/12/19 9:52 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Dne 11. 09. 19 v 17:14 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): sudo dnf module disable libgit2 standard-test-roles sudo dnf remove rust-libgit2-sys-devel sudo dnf upgrade libgit2 sudo dnf module reset libgit2 is option as well. Thanks this worked.

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:55 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run [*]: > > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31 > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync > > If you get this prompt:

Re: GNOME 3.34.0 megaupdate

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:16 AM Olivier Fourdan wrote: > Hi Kalev, > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 9:51 PM Kalev Lember > wrote: > > > > On 9/9/19 12:17, Kalev Lember wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Last week was 3.33.92, and this week is the final 3.34.0 release. I'm > > > wrangling the Fedo

Re: GNOME 3.34.0 megaupdate

Hi Kalev, On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 9:51 PM Kalev Lember wrote: > > On 9/9/19 12:17, Kalev Lember wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Last week was 3.33.92, and this week is the final 3.34.0 release. I'm > > wrangling the Fedora side of the release this time around as well. Same > > as last week, we hav