On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 12:02 AM Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
>
> Hi Nico,
>
> you can check it here: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/
>
> You can see Fedora Rawhide, Fedora 30, Fedora 29 and EPEL7, but there
> is no Fedora 31 which kinda indicates that Koschei has not been
> updated yet.
Which in
On 8/25/19 9:01 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hi Nico,
>
> you can check it here: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/
>
> You can see Fedora Rawhide, Fedora 30, Fedora 29 and EPEL7, but there
> is no Fedora 31 which kinda indicates that Koschei has not been
> updated yet.
yes, it's being worked
Hi Nico,
you can check it here: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/
You can see Fedora Rawhide, Fedora 30, Fedora 29 and EPEL7, but there
is no Fedora 31 which kinda indicates that Koschei has not been
updated yet.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 3:31 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 25,
# F31 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2019-08-26
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have 2 proposed Beta blockers, 1 proposed Final
blocker and 1 proposed Beta freeze exception to review, so let's have a
Fedora 31 blocker review meeting tomorrow!
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow, as there
isn't a lot for the agenda. We will be doing a blocker review meeting,
though - I'll send out the announcement for that in a minute.
If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week,
please do reply to this mail
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 8:33 AM Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
>
> I see that there is no Fedora 31. Is anybody working on creating that
> and moving rawhide forward to 32?
I think you need to take a look at the current Fedora repositories,
you'll find fedora 31 packages and find that the rawhide package a
On 8/25/19 1:17 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hi,
I made a minor mess in the mpich world and instead of upgrading to
3.3.1 from 3.2.1., I built 3.1.1. I was a bit surprised when I got
a bug [1] that mpich in Fedora is from 2014 :(
I'd like to update to 3.3.1, but that needs newer hwloc
Hi,
I made a minor mess in the mpich world and instead of upgrading to
3.3.1 from 3.2.1., I built 3.1.1. I was a bit surprised when I got
a bug [1] that mpich in Fedora is from 2014 :(
I'd like to update to 3.3.1, but that needs newer hwloc which has an
so-bump.
There's a number of users of hwlo
OLD: Fedora-31-20190824.n.0
NEW: Fedora-31-20190825.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 25
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 51.54 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 15/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190824.n.0):
ID: 435666 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/435666
ID: 435685 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-is
On 8/24/19 6:27 AM, Feilong Wang wrote:
> Hi team,
>
Hi Feilong! I'm adding in Spyros who has worked with us in the past on Atomic
Host and Magnum.
> Could you please help me understand when will be the EOL date for Fedora
> Atomic 29? I understand generally it takes 13 months. But given Fed
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190824.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190825.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 8
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 47
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 560.70 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
Not `unrar`, but `unar` :)
On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 2:38 PM Antonio Trande wrote:
>
> 'unrar' is a RPMFusion package.
>
> On 25/08/19 14:16, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > gnustep-base-libs-1.25.0-14.fc31.x86_64
> > openvpn-auth-ldap-2.0.3-28.fc31.x86_64
> > libgnustep-base.so.1.25()(64bit)
> >
'unrar' is a RPMFusion package.
On 25/08/19 14:16, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> gnustep-base-libs-1.25.0-14.fc31.x86_64
> openvpn-auth-ldap-2.0.3-28.fc31.x86_64
> libgnustep-base.so.1.25()(64bit)
> raidem-0.3.1-39.fc31.x86_64
> libgnustep-base.so.1.25()(
I see that there is no Fedora 31. Is anybody working on creating that
and moving rawhide forward to 32?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
ht
gnustep-base-libs-1.25.0-14.fc31.x86_64
openvpn-auth-ldap-2.0.3-28.fc31.x86_64
libgnustep-base.so.1.25()(64bit)
raidem-0.3.1-39.fc31.x86_64
libgnustep-base.so.1.25()(64bit)
unar-1.10.1-12.fc31.x86_64
Hi everybody,
Right now, the snakeyaml package in fedora is out of date by more than
three years (1.17, released in February 2016). We plan to merge the PR
rebasing it to the latest version (1.25, released this month) into
master / rawhide and f31. The new versions include *a lot of bug
fixes*, an
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
21 of 45 required tests failed, 11 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
FAILED: compose.c
Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37267892
On 25/08/19 12:38, Antonio Trande wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> 'gnustep-base' package will be pushed on Rawhide in 10 days.
>
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1
Hi all.
'gnustep-base' package will be pushed on Rawhide in 10 days.
Packages involved:
$ repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora-source
--enablerepo=updates-source --release=rawhide --whatrequires
gnustep-base-devel
Fedora rawhide - Updates Source
Hi,
I still do not know in which file the command Usage:
/usr/bin/python3.7m-x86_64-config is called and what I need to change so that
it can be compiled under F30.
For help, I would be grateful.
make[1]: Leaving directory
'/home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.146/epglv'
Package py
21 matches
Mail list logo
