Re: Could not execute clone: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/home/mcatanzaro/Projects/fedora-scm/eog/.git/info/exclude'

mcatanz...@gnome.org píše v Út 06. 08. 2019 v 10:31 -0500: > $ fedpkg clone eog > Cloning into 'eog'... > remote: Counting objects: 2048, done. > remote: Compressing objects: 100% (1594/1594), done. > remote: Total 2048 (delta 787), reused 1036 (delta 349) > Receiving objects: 100% (2048/2048), 253

Re: Fedora-Rawhide-20190806.n.0 compose check report

On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 11:52 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > No missing expected images. > > Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! > 13 of 45 required tests failed, 8 results missing > openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** > below > Unsatisfied g

Re: Where are armv7hl, i686 and ppc64le Container tar.xz files?

On 8/6/19 9:15 AM, Jun Aruga wrote: >>> Please come! >>> >> Would love to see your examples use podman... > Sorry here is the podman's example. > And no worry. podman's examples are used as much as possible in my talk! > > ``` > $ uname -m > x86_64 > > $ podman run --rm -t arm64v8/fedora:30 uname -

Re: NeuroFedora review swap: python-SALib

On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 11:35:44 +0200, Tomas Korbar wrote: > Hi, > I could take this review. I hope you do not mind that i do not have package in > need of review. Not at all, please proceed :) -- Thanks very much, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wik

Re: fedora-review seam to not work 8-(

On Tuesday, 6 August 2019 05:47:58 CEST J. Scheurich wrote: > > What's your version of fedora-review? You should have 0.7.2 > > > > > > > > Name : fedora-review > > Version : 0.7.2 > > Release : 1.fc30 > > $ fedora-review -V > fedora-review version 0.7.2 65d36bb 2019-04-09 16:30:

Re: fedora-review seam to not work 8-(

Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > Most of modern C++ header-only libraries provides Cmake scripts. Such > scripts will be installed to %{_libdir}/cmake/foo. That's why they > cannot be noarch. CMake will actually also find the scripts if you install them to %{_datadir}/cmake/foo. And if (and ONLY

[HEADS-UP]: Mercurial with Python3 on rawhide?

Hi guys, as discussion was started week ago, Python2 is dying. As that, some dependencies of mercurial will be orphaned soon (or they are already) and mercurial as it is has to move in weeks on Python3. As I wrote in [0], I already started some testing and investigation. Currently it seems that w

Could not execute clone: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/home/mcatanzaro/Projects/fedora-scm/eog/.git/info/exclude'

$ fedpkg clone eog Cloning into 'eog'... remote: Counting objects: 2048, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (1594/1594), done. remote: Total 2048 (delta 787), reused 1036 (delta 349) Receiving objects: 100% (2048/2048), 253.53 KiB | 2.33 MiB/s, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (787/787), done. Co

Re: I wish to drop python2-Cython

Miro Hrončok writes: > I'd like to drop python2-Cython subpackage from Cython, as I consider > it not needed, however there are still packages that buildrequire > it. Let me know if you want to maintain python2-Cython instead of me > and Igor. Hi, I believe you're CC'd on the thread with myself

I wish to drop python2-Cython

I'd like to drop python2-Cython subpackage from Cython, as I consider it not needed, however there are still packages that buildrequire it. Let me know if you want to maintain python2-Cython instead of me and Igor. python2-Cython is buildrequired by: bzr pystatgrab python-cassandra-driver pyth

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190806.n.0 changes

On Tue, Aug 6, 2019, 15:26 Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190805.n.0 > NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190806.n.0 > > = SUMMARY = > Added images:0 > Dropped images: 0 > Added packages: 5 > Dropped packages:2 > Upgraded

Re: Intention to retire Release Notes RPM

On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:58 AM Martin Kolman wrote: > On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 20:44 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:43 PM Martin Kolman wrote: > > > On Sat, 2019-08-03 at 03:45 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 3:10 AM Brian (bex) Exelbierd > > > > wrot

RE: Orphaning/retiring 3 Java packages

Perhaps, if this introduction is done by video conference it could be recorded and archived for future reference on this page – https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Java/ If its not too much trouble. -- Danny Lee   I have been impressed with the urgency of doing. Know

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Ship BerkleyDB backend as a module

On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 8:58 AM Matus Honek wrote: > Hello Stephen, > > I've made changes according to your notes [1], please have a look. And > thanks for the feedback! > > [1] > https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes%2FOpenLDAPwithBerkleyDBasModule&type=revision&diff=549672&oldid=54

Re: I wish to drop python2-Cython

On Tue, Aug 6, 2019, 15:17 Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 06. 08. 19 14:13, Mat Booth wrote: > > > > On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 13:11, Miro Hrončok > > wrote: > > > > On 06. 08. 19 14:07, Mat Booth wrote: > > > eclipse-pydev > > > unused build dep > >

Re: Where are armv7hl, i686 and ppc64le Container tar.xz files?

> > Please come! > > > Would love to see your examples use podman... Sorry here is the podman's example. And no worry. podman's examples are used as much as possible in my talk! ``` $ uname -m x86_64 $ podman run --rm -t arm64v8/fedora:30 uname -m standard_init_linux.go:211: exec user process ca

Re: Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Ship BerkleyDB backend as a module

Hello Stephen, I've made changes according to your notes [1], please have a look. And thanks for the feedback! [1] https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes%2FOpenLDAPwithBerkleyDBasModule&type=revision&diff=549672&oldid=549258 On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 1:49 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:

Re: Where are armv7hl, i686 and ppc64le Container tar.xz files?

On 8/6/19 7:56 AM, Jun Aruga wrote: >> ``` >> $ docker run --rm -t arm64v8/fedora:30 uname -m > standard_init_linux.go:207: exec user process caused "no such file or > directory" >> $ docker run --rm --privileged multiarch/qemu-user-static:register --reset >> $ docker run --rm -t quay.io/junaruga/

Fedora 31 release-blocking deliverables

The list of release-blocking deliverables for Fedora 31 is now available[1]. If there are any changes that should be made that were part of an already-accepted Fedora 31 Change proposal, please let me know. If an edit is required that was not part of an accepted Change proposal, please file a FESCo

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190806.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190805.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190806.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 5 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 94 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 1.67 MiB Size of dropped packages

REMINDER: Fedora 31 Code complete (testable) deadline in one week

According to the Fedora 31 schedule[1], the deadline for Changes to be code complete (i.e. testable enough for beta) is Tuesday 13 August. At this time, all Changes should be testable and tracker bugs should be set to the MODIFIED state. For more information on this deadline, see the wiki[2]. [1]

Re: I wish to drop python2-Cython

On 06. 08. 19 14:13, Mat Booth wrote: On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 13:11, Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 06. 08. 19 14:07, Mat Booth wrote: >     eclipse-pydev >     unused build dep >     attempted removal previously closed > https://src.fedoraproject.or

Re: I wish to drop python2-Cython

On 06. 08. 19 14:07, Mat Booth wrote: eclipse-pydev unused build dep attempted removal previously closed https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/eclipse-pydev/pull-request/1 I already told you it was *NOT* unused -- that there was a packaging bug. And I fixed this bug in a later com

Re: Where are armv7hl, i686 and ppc64le Container tar.xz files?

> ``` > $ docker run --rm -t arm64v8/fedora:30 uname -m standard_init_linux.go:207: exec user process caused "no such file or directory" > > $ docker run --rm --privileged multiarch/qemu-user-static:register --reset > $ docker run --rm -t quay.io/junaruga/multiarch-fedora:30-aarch64 uname -m > aarc

Fedora-Rawhide-20190806.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 13 of 45 required tests failed, 8 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: FAILED: compose.cl

Re: Join the new Minimization Team

On Sun, 2019-08-04 at 16:18 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 at 20:34, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 10:25:55AM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote: > > > > > I've already done some experiments with that. I used multi-stage > > > > > builds >

Re: How do I remove GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS?

Tom Hughes writes: On 06/08/2019 09:37, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: Ok, but does that mean the program has to abort? Could gcc do anything dangerous here? If we were actually trying to catch undefined behavior (e.g. with -fsanitize=undefined), I suspect Fedora wouldn't even boot without a crash.

Re: I wish to drop python2-certifi

On 05. 08. 19 16:07, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 29. 07. 19 16:01, Petr Stodulka wrote: Hi Miro, thanks for notification. I am thinking about that. From the point, that Python2 is going to be death... Mabye I would take it, but I am fan of removing Python2 stuff from Fedora. But Mercurial (hg-git, gi

Re: Nonresponsive maintainers jchaloup, lkundrak, jkaluza

> lkundrak > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1737816 >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1716527 Lubomír is active, he's not always great at replying to emails but he actively updates thing like NetworkManager and I believe he's based in the Red Hat Brno office. Peter ___

Re: Orphaning/retiring 3 Java packages

I could introduce Peter into Fedora java packaging. On 24. 7. 2019 20:03, Peter Boy wrote: Am 23.07.2019 um 16:08 schrieb Mikolaj Izdebski : On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 1:50 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 23. 07. 19 13:27, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: Soon after Fedora 31 branching I intend to retire ja

Nonresponsive maintainers jchaloup, lkundrak, jkaluza

Hello Jan, Lubomír, Jan. Are you responsive? I try to reach your help in bugzilla for a while. jchaloup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1737815 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333990 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1721645 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s

Re: NeuroFedora review swap: python-SALib

Hi, I could take this review. I hope you do not mind that i do not have package in need of review. On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 10:21 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hello, > > Would anyone like to swap reviews please? python-SALib needs review for > inclusion in NeuroFedora: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s

Re: How do I remove GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS?

On 06/08/2019 09:37, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 09:36:47AM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:22 AM Andrew Lutomirski wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91357 Depending on the resolution of that bug, I suggest that Fedora consider dr

Re: Intention to retire Release Notes RPM

On Mon, 2019-08-05 at 20:44 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:43 PM Martin Kolman wrote: > > On Sat, 2019-08-03 at 03:45 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 3:10 AM Brian (bex) Exelbierd > > > wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > Barring objection, I plan to

Re: fedora-review seam to not work 8-(

On 06.08.2019 2:06, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Well, if there is no testsuite and if the headers are truly > architecture-independent Most of modern C++ header-only libraries provides Cmake scripts. Such scripts will be installed to %{_libdir}/cmake/foo. That's why they cannot be noarch. -- Sincerely

Re: How do I remove GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS?

On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 09:36:47AM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:22 AM Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91357 > > > > Depending on the resolution of that bug, I suggest that Fedora > > consider dropping _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS from

NeuroFedora review swap: python-SALib

Hello, Would anyone like to swap reviews please? python-SALib needs review for inclusion in NeuroFedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1737770 It's a relatively simple package. Folks looking for sponsorship, please feel free to review it unofficially too. -- Thanks, Regards, Anku