> "MC" == Michael Cronenworth writes:
MC> Yes, something would have to be invented, and I guess that's why no
MC> one replied.
Well I replied, bit I'm behind on email so...
MC> However, the data exists it is just not available in a standard,
MC> parsable format.
And that was really my ques
On 6/21/19 6:32 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
Well, how do those list build dependencies? How would you extract them
and convert them to package names (or something else which is provided
by the target packages)?
Yes, something would have to be invented, and I guess that's why no one replied
> "MC" == Michael Cronenworth writes:
MC> Any long term plans to support C/C++ apps?
Depends on what you mean by "support", really. Really there's just a
new spec section that gets run and it just needs to echo a list of build
dependencies. That's really all this does; the existing Rust su
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't have
anything urgent for the agenda. If you're aware of anything important
we have to discuss this week, please do reply to this mail and we can
go ahead and run the meeting.
Thanks, everyone!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Communi
If you have a Change proposal that requires changes to Infrastructure,
those proposals must be submitted (i.e. in ChangeReadyForWrangler
category) by 26 June.
Other deadlines approaching:
* 2019-07-02 — Changes requiring mass rebuild
* 2019-07-02 — System-Wide changes
* 2019-07-23 — Self-contained
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_Building_i686_Kernels
== Summary ==
Stop building i686 kernels, reduce the i686 package to a
kernel-headers package that can be used to build 32bit versions of
everything else.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:jforbes| Justin Forbes]]
* Email: jfor...@fedorap
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC230
== Summary ==
Switch glibc in Fedora 31 to glibc version 2.30.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:fweimer|Florian Weimer]]
* Email: fwei...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
The GNU C Library version 2.30 will be released at the beginning of
August 201
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 9:47 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 13:39 +0200, Ernestas Kulik wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As we are all well aware, ABRT has two CLI tools (abrt-cli, from
> > abrt-tui and abrt, from abrt-cli-ng).
>
> Are we? I wasn't...
I only ever use abrt-cli. I don't
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 5:47 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 13:28 +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> > To keep the expectations of Fedora's stable ABI within a release, we
> can't
> > change the default stream of a module mind-release. I know, that's
> probably
> > clear and that's n
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2019-06-21)
===
Meeting started by jforbes at 15:00:42 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2019-06-21/fesco.2019-06-21-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 13:39 +0200, Ernestas Kulik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As we are all well aware, ABRT has two CLI tools (abrt-cli, from
> abrt-tui and abrt, from abrt-cli-ng).
Are we? I wasn't...
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happy
On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 13:28 +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> To keep the expectations of Fedora's stable ABI within a release, we can't
> change the default stream of a module mind-release. I know, that's probably
> clear and that's not the issue here. But building on that, at the same
> time, we can't
Greetings, all!
The elections for FESCo election for Fedora 30 have concluded, and the results
are shown below.
FESCo is electing 4 seats this time.
A total of 205 ballots were cast, meaning a candidate
could accumulate up to 1230 votes (205 * 6).
The results for the elections are as follows:
Hi,
As we are all well aware, ABRT has two CLI tools (abrt-cli, from
abrt-tui and abrt, from abrt-cli-ng). For a long while now, we in the
team have been pondering doing something that would result in only one
surviving. In that vein, I would like to invite you to share your
gripes, use cases, wis
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 1:28 PM Adam Samalik wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 12:08 AM Adam Williamson <
> adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 23:48 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I just wanted to give you an update from my last discussions on
>> >
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 12:08 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 23:48 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I just wanted to give you an update from my last discussions on
> > #fedora-modularity and other places.
> >
> > # Problems definition
> >
> > * Default modules can
Missing expected images:
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
12 of 47 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 20/137 (x86_64), 4/22 (
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 31 Rawhide 20190621.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
20.06.2019, 22:50, "Igor Gnatenko" :
> Hello,
>
> I just wanted to give you an update from my last discussions on
> #fedora-modularity and other places.
>
> # Problems definition
>
> * Default modules can't have conflicting dependenices
> * Changing dependencies in a stream is not supported
>
> #
19 matches
Mail list logo
