Dne 02. 05. 19 v 8:29 Samuel Sieb napsal(a):
> Didn't the upgrade process suggest that you use --allowerasing?
Yes, it does. I tried to use it for few past realeases and ... I cannot
personally recommend it.
Sometimes it works, sometimes it is trying to remove crucial packages like rpm
or dnf.
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 8:30 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> On 5/1/19 8:16 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> > Here I had to remove the following packages (and they took some of
> > their dependencies away with them) beforehand:
> >
> > - python2-hawkey-0.31.0-2.fc29.x86_64
> > - python2-libdnf-0.31.0-2.fc
On 5/1/19 8:16 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
Here I had to remove the following packages (and they took some of
their dependencies away with them) beforehand:
- python2-hawkey-0.31.0-2.fc29.x86_64
- python2-libdnf-0.31.0-2.fc29.x86_64
- python2-migrate-0.11.0-9.fc29.noarch
Didn't the upgrade pr
I just installed Fedora 30, and flatpak is crashing after a few seconds of
downloading. abrt caught the crash and directed me to this report[1]. It looks
like the crash is in libcurl. I can't be the only one experiencing this crash.
Has anyone else seen this?
1: https://retrace.fedoraproject.or
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2019-05-02 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2019-05-02 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2019-05-02 1
On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 9:01 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> You can build into the side tag using:
>
> $ fedpkg build --target f31-ocaml
>
> As far as I know that command should work for any Fedora packager.
Indeed it did: ocaml-zarith-1.8-1.fc31 has been built in the side tag.
--
Jerry James
htt
I've filled in the vacation calendar too, but just in case anyone
doesn't check that - I'm going to be on vacation from 2019-05-02
(tomorrow) to 2019-05-19. Please contact anyone on the QA team (test@
list, #fedora-qa IRC) for general QA stuff, and lruzicka for openQA
stuff. I will be checking my e
On 5/1/19 12:06 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>> Kevin Fenzi writes:
>> > I guess I will enable the From field mitigation for this list, but I
>> > will not like it. ;)
>>
>> It's possible to do this only for domains that advertise p=reject.
>
> Yes please, don't break
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi writes:
> > I guess I will enable the From field mitigation for this list, but I
> > will not like it. ;)
>
> It's possible to do this only for domains that advertise p=reject.
Yes please, don't break things more than what's necessary.
Björn Persson
On 29. 04. 19 22:58, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hey!
There are 2 Python related changes in Fedora 31 that unfortunately interact with
each other.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.8
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Sphinx2
The following packages (owners bcc'ed) BuildRequire both
On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 11:28 +0200, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> hi all,
> I am planning to retire ffgtk as I no longer use it and it does no
> longer work with "recent" Fritzbox modem firmware from AVM. Any
> objections?
>
> I know Roger exists s replacement, but I have no interest in
> packiging
> it
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> On 4/30/19 4:46 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev wrote:
> > Hello all!
> >
> > Currently Fedora mailing lists use "From" field from original messages
> > and if sender's domain use DMARC=reject policy, mailing lists
> > subscribers cannot receive any messages from such users because
On 4/30/19 4:46 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> Currently Fedora mailing lists use "From" field from original messages
> and if sender's domain use DMARC=reject policy, mailing lists
> subscribers cannot receive any messages from such users because their MX
> servers follow DMARC proced
Hello packagers,
The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum
maintenance for the nodejs-bluebird package, and none of our packages
depend on it. So, we're looking for someone to take better care of it,
preferably someone who actively uses nodejs-bluebird or maintains a
package tha
Hello packagers,
The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum
maintenance for the nodejs-sinon package, and none of our packages
depend on it. So, we're looking for someone to take better care of it,
preferably someone who actively uses nodejs-sinon or maintains a
package that depe
Hello packagers,
The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum
maintenance for the json_simple package, and none of our packages
depend on it. So, we're looking for someone to take better care of it,
preferably someone who actively uses json_simple or maintains a
package that depend
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 4:01 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> It's been six months, and like clockwork, we release Fedora 30 today!
Congratulations! I have done in-place upgrades since Fedora 15 and I
was never let down. This time I even had scheduled a set of offline
tasks to do while my laptop
On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 08:53:04AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 8:25 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > OK thanks for looking into this. I won't do another build of that
> > package until OCaml 4.08.0 comes out, at which point I can submit an
> > update or not of zarith as you
I am orphaning the following packages in Fedora:
clpbar - Command line progress bar utility
gpart - guess your partition table (for recovery purposes)
These are low traffic packages, but I lack the time to continue maintaining
these. The packages are already transferred to the orphan user, so fe
On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 8:25 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> OK thanks for looking into this. I won't do another build of that
> package until OCaml 4.08.0 comes out, at which point I can submit an
> update or not of zarith as you wish.
Either way. I'm happy to try a build into your side tag, if
Missing expected images:
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
6 of 47 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQ
On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 07:56:03AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 1:43 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > * ocaml-zarith (integer arithmetic library)
> >
> > Fails to build the final zq binary. I'm not sure this is related to
> > the compiler upgrade at all, could be an unrelat
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 1:43 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> * ocaml-zarith (integer arithmetic library)
>
> Fails to build the final zq binary. I'm not sure this is related to
> the compiler upgrade at all, could be an unrelated FTBFS.
This may be fixed by the recent 1.8 release. The release no
On 3/30/19 7:54 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 1:20 AM John Florian wrote:
On 3/29/19 2:58 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 29. 03. 19 v 19:47 John Florian napsal(a):
I know it's not unusual to carry builds over from prior releases. My
understanding is that happens because ther
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190429.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190501.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:20
Upgraded packages: 160
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.42 GiB
Size of dropped packages
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 08:43:10AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8310
>
> I'm rebuilding OCaml 4.08.0 beta 3 into a side tag. This is a
> preliminary rebuild only - I'll do the real rebuild when 4.08.0 is
> finally released. This email has interim results.
>
Hello packagers,
The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum
maintenance for the nodejs-path-exists package, and none of our
packages depend on it. So, we're looking for someone to take better
care of it, preferably someone who actively uses nodejs-path-exists or
maintains a packa
Hello packagers,
The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum
maintenance for the nodejs-grunt-known-options package, and none of
our packages depend on it. So, we're looking for someone to take
better care of it, preferably someone who actively uses
nodejs-grunt-known-options or m
Hello packagers,
The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum
maintenance for the nodejs-clean-css package, and none of our packages
depend on it. So, we're looking for someone to take better care of it,
preferably someone who actively uses nodejs-clean-css or maintains a
package t
Hello packagers,
The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum
maintenance for the nodejs-supports-color package, and none of our
packages depend on it. So, we're looking for someone to take better
care of it, preferably someone who actively uses nodejs-supports-color
or maintains a
Hello packagers,
The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum
maintenance for the nodejs-set-immediate-shim package, and none of our
packages depend on it. So, we're looking for someone to take better
care of it, preferably someone who actively uses
nodejs-set-immediate-shim or mai
Hello packagers,
The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum
maintenance for the nodejs-arrify package, and none of our packages
depend on it. So, we're looking for someone to take better care of it,
preferably someone who actively uses nodejs-arrify or maintains a
package that de
Hello packagers,
The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum
maintenance for the nodejs-array-uniq package, and none of our
packages depend on it. So, we're looking for someone to take better
care of it, preferably someone who actively uses nodejs-array-uniq or
maintains a package
Hello packagers,
The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum
maintenance for the nodejs-array-union package, and none of our
packages depend on it. So, we're looking for someone to take better
care of it, preferably someone who actively uses nodejs-array-union or
maintains a packa
Hello packagers,
The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum
maintenance for the apache-commons-discovery package, and none of our
packages depend on it. So, we're looking for someone to take better
care of it, preferably someone who actively uses
apache-commons-discovery or maint
On Wed, May 1, 2019, 6:15 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 10:04:55PM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 8:50 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 9:47 AM Tomasz Kłoczko <
> kloczko.tom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 09:04, Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
[..]
> > One of those specs is elfutils.spec in which is:
> >
> > %check
> > # Record some build root versions in build.log
> > uname -r; rpm -q glibc
>
> Funny; that’s pretty much
> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/607
>
>
Hello packagers,
The Stewardship SIG is currently providing only bare-minimum
maintenance for the checkstyle package, and none of our packages
depend on it. So, we're looking for someone to take better care of it,
preferably someone who actively uses checkstyle or maintains a package
that depends
Hi
I'd appreciate review of the following three packages:
- mingw-python3: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1704258
- mingw-qtkeychain: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1705064
- mingw-qca: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1705065
First one is just the current
On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 07:01, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 6:10 AM Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
> >
> > And I think we have covered all the talking points from every previous
> argument.
> > For: We have been doing this since the early 1980's
> > Against: The FHS says you ca
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 10:04:55PM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 8:50 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 9:47 AM Tomasz Kłoczko
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 20:09, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > [..]
> > >>
> > >> The work required to fix pa
On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 6:10 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> And I think we have covered all the talking points from every previous
> argument.
> For: We have been doing this since the early 1980's
> Against: The FHS says you can't do it
> For: The FHS hasn't had an update in 15 years and hasn'
On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 03:28, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 5/1/19 2:24 AM, Ian Kent wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-04-30 at 17:29 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:12:43PM -0400, Robert Marcano wrote:
> >>> On 4/30/19 11:45 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Hi,
>
Le mercredi 01 mai 2019 à 08:18 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko a écrit :
> On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 03:24, Neal Gompa wrote:
> [..]
> >
> Just checked all Fedora spec files to find few of them which are
> using straight rpm command in %build or %check.
> One of those specs is elfutils.spec in which is:
>
On 5/1/19 2:24 AM, Ian Kent wrote:
On Tue, 2019-04-30 at 17:29 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:12:43PM -0400, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 4/30/19 11:45 AM, David Howells wrote:
Hi,
I need to install a directory (/afs) that will be a mountpoint that a
systemd
On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 03:24, Neal Gompa wrote:
[..]
> Second, do you not even know that Mock passes --nodeps to rpmbuild
> because the rpmdb in the chroot isn't necessarily compatible with rpm
> in the chroot? We currently don't allow rpmbuild to evaluate
> dependencies at all. We may change this
46 matches
Mail list logo
