Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> DH> I'm not entirely clear how I should go about requesting FPC
> DH> approval. It says it is preferable that a ticket be filed in the
> DH> packaging committee pagure - do they mean to raise an issue, do you
> DH> know?
>
> Just file a ticket:
>
> https://pagure.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 8:50 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 9:47 AM Tomasz Kłoczko
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 20:09, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > [..]
> >>
> >> The work required to fix packages affected by this disadvantage
> >> (potentially) far outweighs any advantage
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 6:42 PM Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 21:04, Neal Gompa wrote:
>>
>> > And what is wrong with just "BuildRequires: pkgconfig"?
>>
>> That is no guarantee that '/usr/bin/pkg-config' will be provided,
>> which is required by the dep generator and various t
On Tue, 2019-04-30 at 17:29 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:12:43PM -0400, Robert Marcano wrote:
> > On 4/30/19 11:45 AM, David Howells wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I need to install a directory (/afs) that will be a mountpoint that a
> > > systemd
> > > serv
> "DH" == David Howells writes:
DH> I'm not entirely clear how I should go about requesting FPC
DH> approval. It says it is preferable that a ticket be filed in the
DH> packaging committee pagure - do they mean to raise an issue, do you
DH> know?
Just file a ticket:
https://pagure.io/packa
On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 21:04, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > And what is wrong with just "BuildRequires: pkgconfig"?
>
> That is no guarantee that '/usr/bin/pkg-config' will be provided,
> which is required by the dep generator and various tools.
>
You just put in my hand +1 to not use paths in BuildRequ
Many sites do intentionally, even - it's quite popular in University settings
and in the financial sector. Nothing really drives that home like breaking
support for it (which I'd like to say I've never done, but can't). Putting it
anywhere other than /afs would be crazy - especially when /afs
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > >I need to install a directory (/afs) that will be a mountpoint that a
> > >systemd
> > >service (also installed in the rpm) will mount upon.
>
> Nope. New top-level directories are a big thing and need FPC approval:
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 3:49 PM Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 18:19, Neal Gompa wrote:
> [..]
>>
>> If we're going to go down this road, it should be
>>
>> BuildRequires: /usr/bin/pkg-config
>>
>> That's what's required for the dep generator to work, too.
>
>
> And what is wron
On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 18:19, Neal Gompa wrote:
[..]
> If we're going to go down this road, it should be
>
> BuildRequires: /usr/bin/pkg-config
>
> That's what's required for the dep generator to work, too.
>
And what is wrong with just "BuildRequires: pkgconfig"?
Don't you see that this forces
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 05:29:17PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:12:43PM -0400, Robert Marcano wrote:
> > On 4/30/19 11:45 AM, David Howells wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >I need to install a directory (/afs) that will be a mountpoint that a
> > >systemd
> > >s
On 29. 04. 19 22:58, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hey!
There are 2 Python related changes in Fedora 31 that unfortunately interact with
each other.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.8
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Sphinx2
The following packages (owners bcc'ed) BuildRequire both
On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 13:30, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:12:43PM -0400, Robert Marcano wrote:
> > On 4/30/19 11:45 AM, David Howells wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >I need to install a directory (/afs) that will be a mountpoint that a
> systemd
> > >service (also i
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 01:12:43PM -0400, Robert Marcano wrote:
> On 4/30/19 11:45 AM, David Howells wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I need to install a directory (/afs) that will be a mountpoint that a systemd
> >service (also installed in the rpm) will mount upon.
Nope. New top-level directories are a big
On 4/30/19 11:45 AM, David Howells wrote:
Hi,
I need to install a directory (/afs) that will be a mountpoint that a systemd
service (also installed in the rpm) will mount upon.
What's the best way to encode this in the specfile?
I did have:
%files
/afs
but that doesn't upgrad
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 12:38 PM Kalev Lember wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 9:20 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 02:00:41PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > > Proposal: let's drop the autogenerated dependen
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 9:20 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 02:00:41PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Proposal: let's drop the autogenerated dependency on
> /usr/bin/pkg-config
> > > (this would re
On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 14:59, Neal Gompa wrote:
[,,]
> > Bollocks .. just sed/perl oneliner which will add BuildRequires:
> pkgconfig if in package is used any "BuildRequires: pkgconfig() and
> remove from rpmdependencies autogenerator add "Requires: pkgconfig" if
> package has any on the list an
Hi,
I need to install a directory (/afs) that will be a mountpoint that a systemd
service (also installed in the rpm) will mount upon.
What's the best way to encode this in the specfile?
I did have:
%files
/afs
but that doesn't upgrade correctly. Someone gave me another way to
It's been six months, and like clockwork, we release Fedora 30 today!
Thank you to the thousands of people who worked to bring this release
together. Fedora doesn't happen by magic: it happens because of you!
Read the official announcement at:
* https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-fedora-30/
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 9:47 AM Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 20:09, Rex Dieter wrote:
> [..]
>>
>> The work required to fix packages affected by this disadvantage
>> (potentially) far outweighs any advantage
>
>
> Bollocks .. just sed/perl oneliner which will add BuildRequires
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 20:09, Rex Dieter wrote:
[..]
> The work required to fix packages affected by this disadvantage
> (potentially) far outweighs any advantage
>
Bollocks .. just sed/perl oneliner which will add BuildRequires: pkgconfig
if in package is used any "BuildRequires: pkgconfig() an
* Vitaly Zaitsev:
> Currently Fedora mailing lists use "From" field from original messages
> and if sender's domain use DMARC=reject policy, mailing lists
> subscribers cannot receive any messages from such users because their MX
> servers follow DMARC procedure and drop them.
>
> Previously I ope
Before submitting a bugzilla, I wonder whether this is a choice made on
purpose or not.
The pybind11-devel package defines a set of CMake Module files. But (at
least for fedora 29) these files do not end up in
/usr/share/cmake/Modules as usually but in /usr/share/cmake/pybind11
where cmake does no
Hello all!
Currently Fedora mailing lists use "From" field from original messages
and if sender's domain use DMARC=reject policy, mailing lists
subscribers cannot receive any messages from such users because their MX
servers follow DMARC procedure and drop them.
Previously I opened ticket in Fedo
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 11:40:40AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 30. 04. 19 11:35, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 06:44:14PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>PyMca orphan 4 weeks
> >>ago
> >Claimed in https://pagu
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 2:34 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 28. 04. 19 v 22:55 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > currently, we autogenerate a dependency on pkg-config for all rpms
> > that ship a .pc file. "dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/bin/pkg-config"
> > return
On 30. 04. 19 11:35, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 06:44:14PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
PyMca orphan 4 weeks ago
Claimed in https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8318.
See also https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/PyMca
L
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 06:44:14PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> PyMca orphan 4 weeks ago
Claimed in https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8318.
Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I don't need h2 package for anything and it fails to build on F30. It has 2
co-maintainers so maybe someone will pick it up.
--
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse Team
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
On 29/04/19 07:49 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
It would be useful for posts to be specific, and/or to include a link
to a detailed explanation. Such information might attract the interest
of others, and tend to encourage the discovery of multiple approaches
towards dealing with the underlying probl
On 29. 04. 19 18:44, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> jstanek: nodejs-formatio, nodejs-sinon, nodejs-lolex, nodejs-util,
> nodejs-samsam
Claimed: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8317
--
Jan Staněk
Associate Software Engineer, Core Services
Red Hat Czech
jsta...@redhat.com IM: jstanek
signature.asc
Des
On 29/04/19 18:16 +0200, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 05:11:53PM +0200, Dan Čermák wrote:
John Reiser writes:
[..]
> What is the nature of the incompatibilities, and what are specific
> examples?
We switched to from the POSIX regex library to as it should be
provided by a C
python-jenkins-job-builder is fixed.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:58 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hey!
>
> There are 2 Python related changes in Fedora 31 that unfortunately
> interact with
> each other.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.8
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Sphi
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8310
I'm rebuilding OCaml 4.08.0 beta 3 into a side tag. This is a
preliminary rebuild only - I'll do the real rebuild when 4.08.0 is
finally released. This email has interim results.
* ocaml-camlp4, ocaml-camlp5 (macro packages)
Still waiting for these to be por
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019, 04:34 J. Scheurich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> white_dune (3D modeler and animation-tool) reached version 1 cause it could
> render any visible node of VRML87/X3D 3.3.
>
> It needs fedora sponsoring.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153
>
> Petr Mensik wrote
>
> > |
36 matches
Mail list logo
