On 3/22/19 12:23 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 10:05:55PM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
Just FTR:
[tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ egrep -w "popd|pushd" * -l| wc -l
2843
Looks like many Fedora packagers forgot that ..
[tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ rpm -E %_buildshell
/bi
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 3:18 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 2/18/19 12:56 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1c53f1a6c8
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6a2e72916a
> >
> > Would someone please give them a kick?
>
> For some reason
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 10:05:55PM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> Just FTR:
>
> [tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ egrep -w "popd|pushd" * -l| wc -l
> 2843
>
> Looks like many Fedora packagers forgot that ..
>
> [tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ rpm -E %_buildshell
> /bin/sh
So what? On Fedora /bin/s
Just FTR:
[tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ egrep -w "popd|pushd" * -l| wc -l
2843
Looks like many Fedora packagers forgot that ..
[tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ rpm -E %_buildshell
/bin/sh
I'm not sure is it would be good to post full list of all spec files here ..
kloczek
--
Tomasz Kłoczko | L
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v3.0 (libqalculate.so.21).
The following packages are affected -
plasma-workspace
step
cantor
qalculate-kde
I will rebuild these packages and file bug reports if needed. I did not
build v2.9.x despite my earlier email.
Are there objections if I do this
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/2 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in updates-20190320.0):
ID: 369602 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/369602
Passed openQA tests: 1/2 (x86_64)
Installed system
Missing expected images:
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 4/142 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm), 1/24 (i386)
ID: 369386 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/369386
ID: 369407 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps
Thanks for the clarification for my first question.
Michael Zhang
Software Developer Test (WAS Install Team)
Phone: 1-9054133415
E-mail: michael.zh...@ibm.com
- Original message -From: Peter Robinson To: Development discussions related to Fedora C
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019, 18:50 Adam Williamson,
wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 17:25 +, Michael Zhang wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > From the previous email, it was stated that it's mandatory to include
> > the building of the Open Liberty binaries into the rpmbuild. We are
> > planning on doing that and
OLD: Fedora-30-20190316.n.1
NEW: Fedora-30-20190321.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 18
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:6.00 MiB
Size of
On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 17:25 +, Michael Zhang wrote:
> Hi
>
> From the previous email, it was stated that it's mandatory to include
> the building of the Open Liberty binaries into the rpmbuild. We are
> planning on doing that and making it publicly available through
> Github. So does that mean
In the Fedora 30 Beta Go/No-Go meeting we decided to delay the
decision by 1 day. This will allow the creation of a new compose (in
progress) that fixes the one outstanding blocker bug. We determined
that the nature of this fix would not require the full test suite and
that delaying the decision by
HiFrom the previous email, it was stated that it's mandatory to include the building of the Open Liberty binaries into the rpmbuild. We are planning on doing that and making it publicly available through Github. So does that mean that you guys at Fedora are going to rebuild from source to publish,
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190320.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190321.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 113
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 9.86 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Thanks a lot for starting this proposal.
I'm interested in joining this SIG!
Cheers,
Fale
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedo
Missing expected images:
Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
5 of 47 required tests failed, 8 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 17/142 (x86_64), 3/24 (i
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 12:07, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
[..]
> Like what exactly? E.g. all the -Wformat-security warnings are about cases
> where the format strings are constructed shortly before they are passed to
> the format attribute functions, either unmodified or through gettext.
KISS principle
On 3/21/19 9:40 AM, Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> We are pleased to announce the initial version of Packit.
>
> Packit makes it easy to bring and integrate your upstream projects
> into Fedora, right now we are focused to bring upstream
> releases into Fedora rawhide. You can use packit now as a comman
We are pleased to announce the initial version of Packit.
Packit makes it easy to bring and integrate your upstream projects
into Fedora, right now we are focused to bring upstream
releases into Fedora rawhide. You can use packit now as a command-line
tool, soon Packit will run as a hosted service
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:43:49AM +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 11:37, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> [..]
> > > Even gcc themselves "is not written with recent gcc in mind".
> > >
> > > $ grep '\[\-W' gcc.log| awk -F\[ '{print $2}'|awk -F\] '{print
> > > $1}'|sort | uniq -
On 21/03/2019 09:59, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
"-fstack-protector-strong" is the only one that has a clearly
beneficial effect.
But then there's the overall counterargument from Jakub that we start
deviating from upstream defaults and some users will need to add counter-options
to go ba
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 07:53, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> When people see lists like this they are going to assume it is order
> of importance because if X is used N many more times, it must be much
> more important than Y. Most packagers are not because most packages
wow.. I need a better
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 07:46, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 11:37, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> [..]
> > > Even gcc themselves "is not written with recent gcc in mind".
> > >
> > > $ grep '\[\-W' gcc.log| awk -F\[ '{print $2}'|awk -F\] '{print
> > > $1}'|sort | uniq -c | sort
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 11:37, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
[..]
> > Even gcc themselves "is not written with recent gcc in mind".
> >
> > $ grep '\[\-W' gcc.log| awk -F\[ '{print $2}'|awk -F\] '{print
> > $1}'|sort | uniq -c | sort -nr| head -n 20
> > 485 -Wmissing-profile
> > 106 -Wformat-
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 07:23, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 09:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> [..]
> > The effect of "-Wformat -Wformat-security" without -Werror is only more
> > warnings.
> > Unfortunately -Wformat will generate spurious warnings if the code is
>
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 09:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
[..]
> The effect of "-Wformat -Wformat-security" without -Werror is only more
> warnings.
> Unfortunately -Wformat will generate spurious warnings if the code is
> not careful to give additional information to the compiler with
> _
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 09:52:02AM +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote:
> On 3/15/19 9:49 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 04:15:58PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 01:56:14PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/
27 matches
Mail list logo
