Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Automatic strict inter-package dependencies

On 19. 02. 19 8:17, Igor Gnatenko wrote: I've updated wiki page with what Neal said. Thanks. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lis

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 66 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b7556983e8 tomcat-7.0.92-1.el6 62 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-a0ddb153b8 game-music-emu-0.6.2-1.el6 14 https://bodhi.fedorapro

Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Automatic strict inter-package dependencies

I've updated wiki page with what Neal said. On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 8:11 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 19. 02. 19 2:26, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 6:31 PM Tom Stellard > wrote: > >> > >> Would there be some way to opt out of this? In some cases, > %{name}-devel > >> Requir

Re: Orphaned packages that will be retired (and everything will most likely burn)

On 11. 02. 19 17:57, Miro Hrončok wrote: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_

Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Automatic strict inter-package dependencies

On 19. 02. 19 2:26, Neal Gompa wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 6:31 PM Tom Stellard wrote: Would there be some way to opt out of this? In some cases, %{name}-devel Requires only %{name}-libs and not %{name}. Perhaps it's not obvious, but the idea here is that RPM will "sense" what the nam

Unretire python-svgwrite

Hi, I'd like to unretire python-svgwrite. It was originally retired because it failed to build with Python 3.7. Upstream released a new version that fixes this. Copr build -- https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vtrefny/svgwrite/ Review request -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-02-19 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Modularity Team. More information available at: [Modularity Team Docs](https://docs.pagure.o

Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Automatic strict inter-package dependencies

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 6:31 PM Tom Stellard wrote: > > Would there be some way to opt out of this? In some cases, %{name}-devel > Requires only %{name}-libs and not %{name}. > Perhaps it's not obvious, but the idea here is that RPM will "sense" what the name of the subpackage it depends on is,

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Mass updates and reboots

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Mass updates and reboots on 2019-02-26 from 00:00:00 to 00:00:00 UTC At fedora-ad...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is the tentative planned time for updating and rebooting various parts of the Fedora Infrastructure. Sour

Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Automatic strict inter-package dependencies

On 02/18/2019 12:18 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Automatic_strict_inter-package_dependencies > > = Automatic strict inter-package dependencies = > > == Summary == > Implement feature in RPM which will enforce strict dependencies > between subpackages automaticall

Re: two Ceph updates for f28, f29, stuck in pending testing for six days

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 2:48 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 2/18/19 12:56 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1c53f1a6c8 > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6a2e72916a > > > > Would someone please give them a kick? > > For some reason

Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Automatic strict inter-package dependencies

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:00 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 18. 02. 19 21:18, Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Automatic_strict_inter-package_dependencies > > > > = Automatic strict inter-package dependencies = > > > > == Summary == > > Implement feature in RPM which wi

Re: [HEADS UP] Readline 8.0

On 18. 02. 19 1:14, Igor Gnatenko wrote: We have just merged side tag (f30-readline8) into the f30 which includes readline 8 + packages which needed rebuild against new readline (due to SONAME bump). Whatever was failing before and fails now… It just failed. Whatever was not failing before and

Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Automatic strict inter-package dependencies

On 18. 02. 19 21:18, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Automatic_strict_inter-package_dependencies = Automatic strict inter-package dependencies = == Summary == Implement feature in RPM which will enforce strict dependencies between subpackages automatically (right now pa

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2019-02-18)

= #fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2019-02-18) = Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:00 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-02-18/fesco.2019-02-18-15.00.log.html Meeting summar

Re: two Ceph updates for f28, f29, stuck in pending testing for six days

On 2/18/19 12:56 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote: > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1c53f1a6c8 > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6a2e72916a > > Would someone please give them a kick? For some reason autosign likes to not process these correctly. I've retagged the

Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: BuildRequires Generators

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 9:21 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BuildRequires_Generators > > = BuildRequires Generators = > > == Summary == > Add possibility to generate build-time dependencies within RPM spec > file and teach RPM and mock how to handle this. > > == Ow

two Ceph updates for f28, f29, stuck in pending testing for six days

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1c53f1a6c8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6a2e72916a Would someone please give them a kick? Thanks -- Kaleb ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Automatic strict inter-package dependencies

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 9:21 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Automatic_strict_inter-package_dependencies > > = Automatic strict inter-package dependencies = > > == Summary == > Implement feature in RPM which will enforce strict dependencies > between subpackages aut

Re: toolchain requirements for external kernel modules

On 2/15/19 3:47 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: * Laura Abbott: I've been experimenting with enabling CONFIG_GCC_PLUGINS in the kernel since I've heard some people express interest in stackleak (I'm interested as well). a gcc plugin gets built as an .so file for use during compilation. This means we

F31 System-Wide Change proposal: Automatic strict inter-package dependencies

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Automatic_strict_inter-package_dependencies = Automatic strict inter-package dependencies = == Summary == Implement feature in RPM which will enforce strict dependencies between subpackages automatically (right now packagers have to do it themselves). == Ow

F31 System-Wide Change proposal: BuildRequires Generators

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BuildRequires_Generators = BuildRequires Generators = == Summary == Add possibility to generate build-time dependencies within RPM spec file and teach RPM and mock how to handle this. == Owner == * Name: [[User:ignatenkobrain|Igor Gnatenko]], [[User:ffesti|

Re: Retiring pysvn (was Re: Orphaning pysvn (and non-responsive maintainer: ravenoak))

On 2/15/19 5:56 AM, Barry Scott wrote: > > >> On 13 Feb 2019, at 13:52, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 10:01 AM Stephen Gallagher >> wrote: >>> >>> I've been maintaining this for several years since the main admin >>> (ravenoak) vanished from Fedora. I don't use it anymo

Re: koji-build fails on s390x architecure

On 2/14/19 4:29 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 12:10:41 - > "Martin Gansser" wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> the koji-build for speed-dreams [1] fails on s390x architecure. >> >> The root.log show's the following detail: >> >> DEBUG util.py:492: speed-dreams-1:2.2.2-2.fc30 >> #

Agenda for Tuesday's Modularity Team Meeting (2019-02-19)

Find below a list of topics which are planned to be discussed in the Fedora Modularity Team meeting on Tuesday at 15:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-3 on irc.freenode.net. To find out when this is in your local time zone, check the Fedora Calendar (if you've set it and are logged in): https://apps.fed

Re: pwalter pushed to ImageMagick (master). "Update to 6.9.10.28"

18.02.2019, 16:36, "Michael Cronenworth" : > On 2/18/19 10:07 AM, notificati...@fedoraproject.org wrote: >>  Notification time stamped 2019-02-18 16:07:12 UTC >> >>   From b21c11f55efa073c3d6c4798980bf8821131a872 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>  From: Pete Walter >>  Date: Feb 18 2019 15:50:47 + >

Re: pwalter pushed to ImageMagick (master). "Update to 6.9.10.28"

On 2/18/19 10:07 AM, notificati...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Notification time stamped 2019-02-18 16:07:12 UTC From b21c11f55efa073c3d6c4798980bf8821131a872 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pete Walter Date: Feb 18 2019 15:50:47 + Subject: Update to 6.9.10.28 Thanks, Pete, but please stop p

Re: %py3_build should accept options

On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 11:28 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 09. 02. 19 14:51, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 7:48 AM Igor Gnatenko < > ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org > > > wrote: > > > > You can do "%py3_build -- --some-cool-option". >

non-responsive maintainer for Hon Ching(Vicky) Lo

From https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2067: > From discussing with folks at IBM it appears Vicky is no longer > working on tss2, and her contact address bounces. If anyone knows the new address, please let her know. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@

Re: RFE: fedpkgdiff?

On 15. 02. 19 23:19, Richard Shaw wrote: > So in the case of all the FTBFS packages I'm working on instead of > having to manually download packages to some temporary directory from > koji or dnf command I could just do a "fedpkg mockbuild" on my proposed > fix and then "fedpkgdiff /path/to/new/pac

Re: Orphaning mozjs52

On 2/18/19 12:53, Leigh Scott wrote: Hi Kalev, I will take it, please reassign it to me. Done, thanks Leigh! Kalev ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Cod

Re: Orphaning mozjs52

Hello All! I'm working on moving erlang-js to mozjs60 so I don't have any objections on abandoning mozjs52. пн, 18 февр. 2019 г. в 12:48, Kalev Lember : > > > Hi all, > > All of GNOME and the core desktop stack (gjs, polkit, libproxy etc) are > ported from mozjs52 to mozjs60 in rawhide/F30 and I'

Orphaning mozjs52

Hi all, All of GNOME and the core desktop stack (gjs, polkit, libproxy etc) are ported from mozjs52 to mozjs60 in rawhide/F30 and I'd like to orphan mozjs52 or transfer its ownership to someone interested in taking care of it. mozjs52 has two remaining packages linking to it, according to repoq

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2019-02-18)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2019-02-18 15:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be