Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove Excessive Linking

In case if anybody is interested, after mass rebuild we've dropped roughly 27709 dependencies on libraries in RPM metadata which means that size of primary.xml has decreased by 1.3M which would be something like 100K in gzip archive.. Which is not very much, but it was never primary goal and still

Re: Proposal: Abandon v8 package

Hi, Sorry for resurrecting a long-dead thread, but a few things happened recently: 1. v8 was just retired last week or so, 2. R-V8 just ported itself from v8-314 to v8 LTS 6/7. Currently, R-V8 supports both v8-314 and v8, but as the latter fixes several downstream package issues, it is the recom

[HEADS UP] Readline 8.0

We have just merged side tag (f30-readline8) into the f30 which includes readline 8 + packages which needed rebuild against new readline (due to SONAME bump). Whatever was failing before and fails now… It just failed. Whatever was not failing before and fails now… Fails not due to readline update.

Re: Review request/swap for cros-guest-tools

On dimanche 17 février 2019 17:01:27 CET Jason Montleon wrote: > Hi, > I packaged the integration tools for running Fedora 29 as a guest on Chrome > OS under crostini. > > Most of the binaries and other files are bind mounted into the container so > the rest of what is set up (and included in the

Re: Readline 8.0 rebase in progress

On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 11:32 PM Jerry James wrote: > Was the apparently in-progress readline 8.0 rebase announced > somewhere? All I can recall seeing is [1], which said, 3.5 weeks ago, > that the rebase would happen "in a couple of weeks". But apparently > there is a side tag and builds are i

Readline 8.0 rebase in progress

Was the apparently in-progress readline 8.0 rebase announced somewhere? All I can recall seeing is [1], which said, 3.5 weeks ago, that the rebase would happen "in a couple of weeks". But apparently there is a side tag and builds are in progress. I would have appreciated a heads-up on this. I c

[HEADS UP] Bash 5.0

Bash 5.0 is now in Rawhide/F30. Enjoy :) P.S. Don't hesitate to report bugs if you find one (or two). ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: http

Fedora Rawhide-20190217.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 4 of 47 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 21/143 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm), 1/24 (i386) Ne

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190217.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190216.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190217.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:5 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 7 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 102 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 284.36 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: %py3_build should accept options

On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 11:28 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 09. 02. 19 14:51, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 7:48 AM Igor Gnatenko < > ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org > > > wrote: > > > > You can do "%py3_build -- --some-cool-option". >

Review request/swap for cros-guest-tools

Hi, I packaged the integration tools for running Fedora 29 as a guest on Chrome OS under crostini. Most of the binaries and other files are bind mounted into the container so the rest of what is set up (and included in the packages) are just links, configs, and systemd unit files. https://bugzill

[Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Rawhide 20190217.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 30 Rawhide 20190217.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: GCC 9 OpenMP issues

Il 2/16/19 9:55 PM, Sérgio Basto ha scritto: > > Just remove "default(none)" from "# pragma omp parallel default(none) > shared(thr_nbr_act)" doesn't fix the build for you ? > > Yes, thanks, upstream had replied and gave me a patch that removes "default(none)" from some places in the code. Matti

Orphaning: supybot-git, adobe-source-libraries and openerp

Dear list, As heading says: I have orphaned the packages supybot-git, adobe-source-libraries and openerp. This is overdue since long, I have not maintained these packages properly. Of course, they are all free to pick. Cheers! --alec ___ devel maili

review request: vcglib

Hi, I entered a review request for the vcglib library. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989 Despite it's name, this is not a real .a/.so library. It is just a huge collection of C++ header files. Unfortunatly i can not offer a official review swap, cause i am not in the packager

Re: Downloading modularized packages from Koji

On 2019-02-17 03:30, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Marcin Zajączkowski wrote on 2019/02/17 6:55: >> Hi, >> >> After some packages (such as Fish [1]) are released to Fedora modular >> repository I would like to download them from Koji and play with them >> (to provide feedback) not having to wait until a r

Re: Orphan/retire gogoc

Hi, > Hello, > > gogoc is dead to the world upstream (the gogo6.com site is now a > nutritional supplement pusher!), and without gogo6's servers, gogoc is > fairly useless. It's still possible it could be used to TSP tunnel > through one's own servers to get IPv6, but as far as I know, there > ar

Re: Python packages with extras dependencies

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 9:36 PM Eli Young wrote: > > I'd still consider this on case by case basis instead of developing a > general > > solution, sometimes a simple Recommends works. Sometimes, it's more > complicated. > > That's fair and makes a lot of sense. I do like the pattern mentioned by