Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On 11. 02. 19 8:24, Miro Hrončok wrote: This is needed for ARM by ghc:8.4 and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GHC_8.4 And will you take it? I now see you will. Thank You! -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailin

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On 11. 02. 19 4:33, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 4:27 AM Miro Hrončok I plan to retire packages that were already announced 3 times next Monday. Which packages? Such packages that will be listed as 7+ weeks orphaned and will have no open releng ticket. Might very we

Re: Help needed for FTBFS in rawhide because of libraries order

Peng Wu wrote on 2019/02/11 14:12: Thanks for the investigation, I just back port the patch for Fedora rawhide now. Peng On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:32 PM Parag Nemade wrote: I think this commit https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pango/commit/d0cb6be7431d1a3c711bd45bcf05b34601604037 will revert

Re: Orphaning: llvm5.0, clang5.0, llvm6.0, clang6.0

I can take llvm5.0: I already requested unorphaning from releng. llvm5.0 is needed on ARM by ghc:8.4 and ghc:8.6 needs llvm6.0. Jens ps (It *might* be possible to bump some of those for ghc but I don't really have the extra time needed for that.) On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:27 AM Tom Stellard wr

Re: Help needed for FTBFS in rawhide because of libraries order

Thanks for the investigation, I just back port the patch for Fedora rawhide now. Peng On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:32 PM Parag Nemade wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 5:44 PM Mamoru TASAKA > wrote: > >> Guido Aulisi wrote on 2019/02/03 20:31: >> > Hi, >> > I'm trying to debug a FTBFS in rawhid

Re: Orphaned packages to be retired

On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 4:27 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for > sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fedoraproj

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: Bash 5.0

On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 9:22 PM Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > > I don't read repodata manually, libsolv does it for me. Using libdnf and/or > > libmodulemd is not something what (for example) OBS would do. They rely on > > libsolv for all dependency solving operations. And unless it will support

Re: Orphaning: llvm5.0, clang5.0, llvm6.0, clang6.0

On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 5:50 PM Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/beignet/ > > Last commits are from 2018/08 which is half year ago. > > I'd like to keep it, but try using master branch. Beignet is dead upstream, Intel are no longer supporting it. Dave. ___

Re: F30 change, bootloaderspec by default

On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:08 AM Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 5:28 AM Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BootLoaderSpecByDefault > > > > I want this change to succeed but I'm experiencing a regression, and > > while trying to troubleshoo

Re: java: Unrecognized option: --add-modules

On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 11:13 AM Tako Schotanus wrote: > Not done anything with Java modules yet so I might be completely wrong, > but isn't modules a Java 9 feature? > Yeah, I think I jumped the gun... Having issues and should have backed up first, now I can't downgrade to a previous version of

Identical doxygen docs on different architectures

With the introduction of doxygen 1.8.15 in rawhide (or perhaps just better noarch rpmdiff checks?), the paraview-doc noarch sub-package is now different on different architectures: BuildError: The following noarch package built differently on different architectures: paraview-doc-5.5.2-20.fc30

Re: Self Introduction: Dragos Iorga

Hello Leigh! Here is my first review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1674278 I know it's a pretty small program but it seems ok for a start. Thank you! Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ La duminică, februarie 10, 2019 5:15 PM, Leigh Scott a scris:

[Test-Announce] 2019-02-11 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2019-02-11 # Time: 16:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! We didn't meet for a couple of weeks, so let's get together and complete the agenda from the last mee

[Test-Announce] 2019-02-11 @ 17:00 UTC - Fedora 30 Blocker Review Meeting

# F30 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2019-02-11 # Time: 17:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have 4 proposed Beta blockers and 4 proposed Final blockers to review, so let's have a Fedora 30 blocker review meeting on Monday! If you have time this weekend, y

Re: %py3_build should accept options

On 09. 02. 19 14:51, Richard Shaw wrote: On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 7:48 AM Igor Gnatenko > wrote: You can do "%py3_build -- --some-cool-option". I'll see about trying that.. I'm trying to build PySide2 but it's not passing --verbose or -j12 to the cma

Re: Self Introduction: Dragos Iorga

Welcome. Feel free to CC me to your first package review, maybe I can assist. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-o

Re: java: Unrecognized option: --add-modules

Not done anything with Java modules yet so I might be completely wrong, but isn't modules a Java 9 feature? On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 4:00 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > When did java lose its option for --add-modules?!?!? > > # java --add-modules java.activation > Unrecognized option: --add-modules > E

Re: signing status

On 2/10/19 8:01 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sat, 2019-02-09 at 10:33 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On 2/9/19 2:00 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: >>> On 08. 02. 19 17:41, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Just wanted to update everyone on our current status. ... I'm hopeful that it will catch bac

Re: MBI (Playground 2.0)

On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 16:00, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 14:31, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2019-02-07 at 12:21 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 09:40, Stephen John Smoogen > > > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 09:21, Fa

Re: signing status

On Sat, 2019-02-09 at 10:33 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 2/9/19 2:00 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 08. 02. 19 17:41, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > Just wanted to update everyone on our current status. > > > > > > ... > > > > > > I'm hopeful that it will catch back up today and we can go back > > >

java: Unrecognized option: --add-modules

When did java lose its option for --add-modules?!?!? # java --add-modules java.activation Unrecognized option: --add-modules Error: Could not create the Java Virtual Machine. Error: A fatal exception has occurred. Program will exit. # rpm -q java-1.8.0-openjdk java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.191.b13-0.f

Self Introduction: Dragos Iorga

Hello. My name is Dragos. I'm 14 years old. I like programming, computing, GNU/Linux, Fedora and system administration. I've used GNU/Linux and other FOSS software for 5 years. I can program in Python and C/C++. I feel comfortable in Bash. I want to contribute to Fedora because I want to give some

Re: MBI (Playground 2.0)

On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 9:29 AM Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > > FWIW, openQA tests have been failing relatively frequently with > > timeouts while refreshing repos or 503s from mirrormanager for the last > > few weeks. I'm pretty sure this didn't used to be anything like as > > common... > > Whether

Changes in nheko and mtxclient packages

Hello! I'm going to change upstream of nheko and mtxclient packages to a fork. Original upstreams are dead and no longer maintained. Original upstream: https://github.com/mujx/nheko New upstream: https://github.com/Nheko-Reborn/nheko -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) __

Re: Policy regarding service preset enabled (e.g. performance co-pilot)

Hello, On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 10:08:51AM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 6:47 AM Georg Sauthoff wrote: > > [...] > > I'm asking because installing the dstat replacement[1] in Fedora 29 > > resulted in 3 additional always running systemd services[2] and 2 open > > ports. >