Hi,
Ben Cotton wrote on Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 03:16:56PM -0500:
> == Detailed Description ==
> GCC 9 is currently in stage4 since January 7th, in prerelease state
> with only regression bugfixes and documentation fixes allowed. The
> release will happen probably in the middle of April.
> rpms have
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 7:54 AM Randy Barlow
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2019-01-17 at 13:04 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > I'd be very interested to know how adding some random line to a
> > commit message
> > grants an explicit license according to something that is not even
> > linked from
> > the commi
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity WG (weekly) on 2019-01-22 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Working Group.
More information available at: [Modularity Working Group wiki
page](
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190117.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190121.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 19
Dropped packages:6
Upgraded packages: 199
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 6.62 MiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 47 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 10/132 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Rawhide-20190117.n.0):
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 4:38 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> I think we want this to go through. The new version is already packaged and
> I know some work has been done to resolve compilation failures. There's
> still plenty of time to resolve the remaining issues.
>
I agree, mostly bec
On 21. 01. 19 21:16, Ben Cotton wrote:
[This proposal was submitted after the deadline. I am announcing it
for community discussion and will leave the decision on whether or not
to grant an exception to FESCo]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC9
== Summary ==
Switch GCC in Fedora 30 to
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 10:36:51PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> I certainly would be very disappointed to not see the latest release
> of gcc in Fedora. The release notes are underwhelming, but I expect
> there are many improvements to look forward to. For example, I know
> there are
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 03:27:23PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 3:17 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >
> > [This proposal was submitted after the deadline. I am announcing it
> > for community discussion and will leave the decision on whether or not
> > to grant an exception to FESCo]
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 30 Rawhide 20190121.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Ok will do. Thanks for the tidbit, Matthew. I'll wait a little longer but I do wish to publish this package asap.
Michael Zhang
Software Developer Test (WAS Install Team)
Phone: 1-9054133415
E-mail: michael.zh...@ibm.com
- Original message -From: M
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 08:06:36PM +, Michael Zhang wrote:
> > That's generally hard to predict. A package review takes anywhere from
> > an half an hour or a few years. Since in this case you also need to find
> > a sponsor, it'll probably be a few weeks.
> Ok thanks for the info.
If you're h
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 3:17 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> [This proposal was submitted after the deadline. I am announcing it
> for community discussion and will leave the decision on whether or not
> to grant an exception to FESCo]
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC9
>
> == Summary ==
> S
[This proposal was submitted after the deadline. I am announcing it
for community discussion and will leave the decision on whether or not
to grant an exception to FESCo]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC9
== Summary ==
Switch GCC in Fedora 30 to 9.x.y, rebuild all packages with it, or
o
Ok thanks for the info.
Michael Zhang
Software Developer Test (WAS Install Team)
Phone: 1-9054133415
E-mail: michael.zh...@ibm.com
- Original message -From: "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek" To: Development discussions related to Fedora Cc:Subject: Re:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 04:01:22PM +, Michael Zhang wrote:
> On another note, how long will it generally take for my package to be
> reviewed after submission?
That's generally hard to predict. A package review takes anywhere from
an half an hour or a few years. Since in this case you also ne
Andreas Schneider [1] that is aware of Fedora community work on packaging ROCm
stack, showed me his pending pull request [2] that
"cleans up cmake so that the library can be correctly packaged for
distributions. It also cleans up cmake as there are several things which should
not be done in cmak
Hi Zbyszek,On another note, how long will it generally take for my package to be reviewed after submission?
Michael Zhang
Software Developer Test (WAS Install Team)
Phone: 1-9054133415
E-mail: michael.zh...@ibm.com
- Original message -From: "Zbigni
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 03:22:30PM +, Michael Zhang wrote:
> As for the srpm and spec file, I can just add it to the bug as an attachment?
Yes, that's fine.
Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
Hi Zbyszek,Thanks for the help. I believe my current mailing system adds html tags to any emails I send. I will try to disable that. As for the srpm and spec file, I can just add it to the bug as an attachment?
Michael Zhang
Software Developer Test (WAS Install Team)
Phone:
On 17. 01. 19 23:41, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2019-
On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 12:58 +0100, Felix Schwarz wrote:
> Am 21.01.19 um 09:11 schrieb Ian Kent:
> > As much as I would like to help I need to get an additional SSD
> > for my NUC8i7HNK (Radeon™ RX Vega M GL graphics) for that (I hope
> > fairly soon).
> >
> > And I think the Vega needs a later ve
Am Montag, den 21.01.2019, 12:47 +0100 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser:
> The update to GCC 9 broke the Rawhide buildroot for any package that
> (Build)Requires: gcc{,-c++} and/or libtool.
>
> I've already successfully rebuilt annobin and the rebuilt of libtool
> is
> currently running. [1] After
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 03:11:24PM +0300, Vascom wrote:
> Why package gcc has version 9.0.0 but in changelog - 9.0.1?
Fixed in my copy. 9.0.0 is the right version.
Jakub
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe sen
Why package gcc has version 9.0.0 but in changelog - 9.0.1?
пн, 21 янв. 2019 г. в 14:48, Björn 'besser82' Esser
:
>
> The update to GCC 9 broke the Rawhide buildroot for any package that
> (Build)Requires: gcc{,-c++} and/or libtool.
>
> I've already successfully rebuilt annobin and the rebuilt of
Am 21.01.19 um 09:11 schrieb Ian Kent:
> As much as I would like to help I need to get an additional SSD
> for my NUC8i7HNK (Radeon™ RX Vega M GL graphics) for that (I hope
> fairly soon).
>
> And I think the Vega needs a later version of ROCm as well.
Yes, AFAIK Vega M is not (yet?) supported by
The update to GCC 9 broke the Rawhide buildroot for any package that
(Build)Requires: gcc{,-c++} and/or libtool.
I've already successfully rebuilt annobin and the rebuilt of libtool is
currently running. [1] After the libtool build has finished, everything
should be working again.
I'll take care
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
I plan to
On Mon, 14 Jan 2019, 16:01 Nicolas Mailhot Le 2019-01-11 19:33, Tomasz Kłoczko a écrit :
> > On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 13:37, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
> >>> So in 107 current Fedora specs are used %lang() macros.
> >>> Probably some of them can be removed by proper use %find_lang.
> >>
> >> The prob
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 1:29 PM Owen Taylor wrote:
> If I understand the proposal, I'm slightly concerned that the proposed
> use of Supplements: means that there will be no longer any single
> place where we declare "this is our recommended font for LangX, this
> is our recommended input method
On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 08:39 +0100, Felix Schwarz wrote:
> Am 09.01.19 um 11:50 schrieb Germano Massullo:
> > AMD ROCm - Open Source Platform for HPC and Ultrascale GPU Computing[1]
> > is packaged by upstream only for RHEL/CentOS and Ubuntu.
> > Is anybody working on packaging it for Fedora? If not
31 matches
Mail list logo
