How about switch build rpms for exotic and slow arches (arm, s390...)
from hardware to cross-compile on x86_64?
mock can do it via qemu-user-static
пн, 14 янв. 2019 г. в 10:37, Dan Horák :
>
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 20:52:30 -0500
> Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 8:50 PM Neal Gompa
On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 20:52:30 -0500
Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 8:50 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > * Buildbot (Python 3)
> > * Jenkins (Java)
> > * Vespene (Python 3)
> > * GoCD (Java + Ruby)
> > * Zuul (Python)
> >
> > Of the four listed above, only the first two are packaged in F
On 07. 12. 18 20:51, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
The facility that houses the Fedora s390 server will have a major
power outage starting 2019-01-11 22:00 UTC and ending 2019-01-14 22:00
UTC. During this time the s390 builders will not be available and all
builds will be queued up until they are a
> Well, those low-cost devices are typically:
> * usable only for development/hacking/toying around, due to their form
> factor (bare board), peripherals and/or (lack of) computing power,
Certainly not, there are many ARM devices with processors that are well over
the 2 GHz clock mark, have sev
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 10:08 PM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Well, strictly speaking, this is really only a problem for IBM
> > architectures (ppc64le and s390x) because there's no economical way
> > for anyone to be able to care for them. For both ARM architectures we
> > suppor
Neal Gompa wrote:
> Well, strictly speaking, this is really only a problem for IBM
> architectures (ppc64le and s390x) because there's no economical way
> for anyone to be able to care for them. For both ARM architectures we
> support, there are a number of low-cost (in the impulse buy range,
> eve
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 8:50 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> * Buildbot (Python 3)
> * Jenkins (Java)
> * Vespene (Python 3)
> * GoCD (Java + Ruby)
> * Zuul (Python)
>
> Of the four listed above, only the first two are packaged in Fedora.
> Buildbot is up-to-date in Fedora, but Jenkins lags behind consid
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 5:42 AM Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 11:05:33 +0100
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > On 12. 01. 19 19:47, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On 1/12/19 5:59 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > >> On 12. 01. 19 14:19, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > >>> Dan Horák wrote:
> > This is a rem
On 1/13/19 4:11 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 14:51, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> During this time the s390 builders will not be available and all
>> builds will be queued up until they are available and will not
>> complete.
>
> The good news is that the builders appear to be
On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 at 14:51, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> During this time the s390 builders will not be available and all
> builds will be queued up until they are available and will not
> complete.
The good news is that the builders appear to be already back up now, a day
before schedule. The
On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 at 11:09, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > When there were secondary arch koji's it took a number of people full
> > time to nurse along koji shadow. Often things would land in primary,
> > secondary would find a bug later and there would need to be a lot of
> > co
On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 at 12:47, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 11:54 AM Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 at 22:25, Nico Kadel-Garcia
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 4:37 PM Roberto Ragusa
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On 1/8/19 4:22 PM, Le
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 07:51:34PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Side note, I was at a loss of what you were getting at. There were several
> > ways it could be interpreted and has been used by people in the past to
> > mean different things.
>
> I think John's state
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 11:54 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 at 22:25, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 4:37 PM Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>> >
>> > On 1/8/19 4:22 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> >
>> > > If all you want to do is count, then it shoul
On 13. 01. 19 16:58, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
Greetings,
I'm planning to work on the python packages I maintain to move them to
python 3 only as per the python 2 deprecation in f30.
Thanks!
Look at https://fedora.portingdb.xyz/maintainer/dridi/
The colors are explained on the main site: http
On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 at 22:25, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 4:37 PM Roberto Ragusa
> wrote:
> >
> > On 1/8/19 4:22 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >
> > > If all you want to do is count, then it should be entirely sufficient
> > > to do it like this:
> > >
> > >GET /meta
I think you are looking for something like
https://gist.github.com/ignatenkobrain/e4d554c2a2263681f90c971adaf930e9,
except that you want to change lines
https://gist.github.com/ignatenkobrain/e4d554c2a2263681f90c971adaf930e9#file-needless-scriptlets-c-L278-L305
to pool_whatmatchessolvable().
Let m
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 04:58:58PM +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm planning to work on the python packages I maintain to move them to
> python 3 only as per the python 2 deprecation in f30.
>
> I would like to find all the dependencies of my packages of interest,
> but couldn
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> When there were secondary arch koji's it took a number of people full
> time to nurse along koji shadow. Often things would land in primary,
> secondary would find a bug later and there would need to be a lot of
> coordination and back and forth before things were fixed in both
Greetings,
I'm planning to work on the python packages I maintain to move them to
python 3 only as per the python 2 deprecation in f30.
I would like to find all the dependencies of my packages of interest,
but couldn't find an off-the-shelf script I would feed SRPM names that
would recursively re
Am 10.01.19 um 03:28 schrieb Tom Stellard:
> hsakmt and the rocm-runtime are currently packaged in Fedora, but aren't
> up-to-date with upstream. I've wanted to package hip as well, but I've
> been waiting for hip to drop the hcc dependency since it is so hard to
> package.
Do you know when thi
* J. Scheurich [13/01/2019 09:42] :
>
> What can be improvided ?
Hi.
I reviewed your spec file and found a number of chnages that could me made.
* The tags would be more readable if their values were aligned.
* This is the longest description I've ever seen. I would shorten it.
* Some lines are
On 13. 01. 19 11:41, Dan Horák wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 11:05:33 +0100
Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 12. 01. 19 19:47, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On 1/12/19 5:59 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 12. 01. 19 14:19, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Dan Horák wrote:
This is a reminder that this begins this Friday and will
pr
On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 11:05:33 +0100
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 12. 01. 19 19:47, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On 1/12/19 5:59 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> On 12. 01. 19 14:19, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >>> Dan Horák wrote:
> This is a reminder that this begins this Friday and will
> probably be in p
On 12. 01. 19 19:47, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On 1/12/19 5:59 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 12. 01. 19 14:19, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Dan Horák wrote:
This is a reminder that this begins this Friday and will probably be in
place for 4 days. If there are increased downtimes, we will update the
data when we
On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:55:22 +0100
Dan Horák wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:42:55 +0100
> "J. Scheurich" wrote:
>
> >
> > > I have looked at your spec/srpm and it needs much improvement,
> >
> > What can be improvided ?
> > The srpm produces a valid rpm on all architecures,
> > all tips of
I added a comment to the bug review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153#c16
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfed
On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:42:55 +0100
"J. Scheurich" wrote:
>
> > I have looked at your spec/srpm and it needs much improvement,
>
> What can be improvided ?
> The srpm produces a valid rpm on all architecures,
> all tips of
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653481
>
> has been
> I have looked at your spec/srpm and it needs much improvement,
What can be improvided ?
The srpm produces a valid rpm on all architecures,
all tips of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653481
has been followed.
so long
MUFTI
___
devel
I have looked at your spec/srpm and it needs much improvement, it demonstrates
that your rpm packaging skills are lacking .
Did you even take the time to read the Fedora packaging guidelines?
Currently I wouldn't consider sponsoring you and I doubt anyone else will till
it improves.
_
30 matches
Mail list logo
