Re: [HEADS UP] Rawhide buildroot now has glibc-minimal-langpack instead

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 04:21:12PM +, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2018-11-28, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > the removal of glibc-all-langpacks from the buildroot[0] is done. > > Standard buildroot has decreased from 445 to 237 megabytes in > > installed size ;) > > > That's nice, but Koji builders have

Re: [HEADS UP] Rawhide buildroot now has glibc-minimal-langpack instead

> * Petr Pisar [2018-12-03 11:24]: > > On 2018-11-28, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > the removal of glibc-all-langpacks from the buildroot[0] is done. > > > Standard buildroot has decreased from 445 to 237 megabytes in > > > installed size ;) > > > > > That's nice, but Koji builders have not been rec

Re: Octave 4.4 update coming soon to rawhide

On 12/4/18 11:10 PM, Vascom wrote: I am want rpm, not module. The module provides rpms. What's the difference? ср, 5 дек. 2018 г. в 00:38, José Abílio Matos : On Tuesday, 4 December 2018 13.09.16 WET Vascom wrote: What about Octave 4.4. for F29? It is already there, although hidden (in

Hi. i wish to contribute

Hi, my name is Suraj and I have an idea for an article which is Linux commands im newbie to this word please guide me with proper steps . im very enthusiastic person to start contribute to my favorite os that is fedora ___ devel mailing list -- devel@li

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 7:59 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Neal Gompa: > > > The problem with merged source trees (aka source-git) is that it > > implies forking projects. > > But that's true for *any* distribution that wants to integrate things. > I guess you could govern everything by build flag

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 3:54 PM Ken Dreyer wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:12 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > I'm worried that this kind of pointless work makes it hard to attract > > talent. > > Florian, you might want to check out rdopkg. > https://github.com/softwarefactory-project/rdopkg . It

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20181206.n.0 compose check report

On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 15:25 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > No missing expected images. > > Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! > 5 of 47 required tests failed > openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** > below So - this is a new feature of chec

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 6:12 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > I'm worried that this kind of pointless work makes it hard to attract > talent. Florian, you might want to check out rdopkg. https://github.com/softwarefactory-project/rdopkg . It's a bit like fedpkg, in that it's a CLI with sub-commands. Th

Re: authselect: what to do with systemd and nss-mdns that modify nsswith.conf

On Do, 06.12.18 19:42, Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) wrote: > >> Reading https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284325 there is can > >> happen some ID overlaps with FreeIPA/Samba which is undesirable. I would > >> say > >> that this must be solves if this module is enabled by default

Re: authselect: what to do with systemd and nss-mdns that modify nsswith.conf

* Lennart Poettering: > On Do, 06.12.18 14:58, Pavel Březina (pbrez...@redhat.com) wrote: > >> > Then there is nss-mymachines. It's primarily useful if >> > systemd-machined or systemd-nspawn is used. Given that those are now >> > part of the 'systemd-container' RPM it would be OK to also add >> >

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

* Petr Pisar: > On 2018-12-06, Florian Weimer wrote: >> In a sense, it's the old discussion between explicit rename recording >> and rename detection. I think it's clear by now that rename detection >> has won. > Can you give us some example of a rename detection that works? I meant file syste

Re: Self Introduction David Schwörer

On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:28 PM David Schwörer wrote: > This will make Fedora an even more > attractive OS for Fusion Physicists. > Wow, welcome David! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@

Re: Atomic 29: ostree upgrade failed because of libdnf

On 12/6/18 6:20 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 4:13 PM Dusty Mabe > wrote: > > > > On 12/5/18 5:14 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 6:57 PM Dusty Mabe

Re: [HEADS UP] Rawhide buildroot now has glibc-minimal-langpack instead

* Petr Pisar [2018-12-03 11:24]: > On 2018-11-28, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > the removal of glibc-all-langpacks from the buildroot[0] is done. > > Standard buildroot has decreased from 445 to 237 megabytes in > > installed size ;) > > > That's nice, but Koji builders have not been reconfigured away

Re: Packaging FOSS that requires MATLab at runtime

On 12/3/18 8:48 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 12:41:41 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Since correctness is really important here, if upstream does not test the toolboxes against Octave, we shouldn't either I think that if it runs at all, we should ship it. Some upstreams seem pretty

Re: authselect: what to do with systemd and nss-mdns that modify nsswith.conf

On Do, 06.12.18 16:34, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > > I wonder if we should think of a tighter system integration and subsume > > the tasks of nss_machines into SSSD. > > It would allow for detection and logging of UID conflicts should they > > happen in a live system w

Re: Valgrind and Fedora debuginfo: best GUI

On Thu, 06 Dec 2018 11:59:35 +0100, Germano Massullo wrote: > This seems to not happen with Valgrind I would first suggest using compiler option -fsanitize=address instead of valgrind. Jan Kratochvil ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.

Re: authselect: what to do with systemd and nss-mdns that modify nsswith.conf

On Do, 06.12.18 11:25, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > Summary: I'd make things simple, and enable all four unconditionally > > > and by default without any dynamic infrastructure, without postinst > > > scripts or anything. If that's not acceptable, then at least two of the > > > four s

Re: authselect: what to do with systemd and nss-mdns that modify nsswith.conf

On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 11:25:04AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 16:00 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 02:36:36PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > On Do, 06.12.18 12:20, Pavel Březina (pbrez...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, >

Self Introduction David Schwörer

Hi all, My name is David Schwörer, and I am a PhD Student in Ireland and have been using Fedora for many years, and would like to contribute to Fedora. I am one of the upstream developers of BOUT++, a library to write fluid and plasma simulations in curvilinear geometry. BOUT++ is a C++ library t

Re: authselect: what to do with systemd and nss-mdns that modify nsswith.conf

On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 16:00 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 02:36:36PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Do, 06.12.18 12:20, Pavel Březina (pbrez...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > Heya! > > > > > systemd and nss-mdns packages modifies nsswit

Re: authselect: what to do with systemd and nss-mdns that modify nsswith.conf

On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 02:36:36PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Do, 06.12.18 12:20, Pavel Březina (pbrez...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > Hello, > > Heya! > > > systemd and nss-mdns packages modifies nsswitch.conf in their %post > > scriptlets which creates conflicts with authselect on syste

Re: Bodhi update problems?

On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 9:53 AM Randy Barlow wrote: > On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 08:37 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > 1. When I add updates for one package and then type in a new name at > > the top and select the other package I want in the update the > > existing updates that are checked off turn int

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

On 2018-12-06, Daniel P Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 02:48:32PM +, Petr Pisar wrote: >> On 2018-12-06, Florian Weimer wrote: >> > In a sense, it's the old discussion between explicit rename recording >> > and rename detection. I think it's clear by now that rename detection >>

Re: Bodhi update problems?

On Thu, 2018-12-06 at 08:37 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > 1. When I add updates for one package and then type in a new name at > the top and select the other package I want in the update the > existing updates that are checked off turn into six digit numbers. This should have been fixed by 3.11.3,

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

On Thursday, December 6, 2018 3:48:32 PM CET Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2018-12-06, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > In a sense, it's the old discussion between explicit rename recording > > and rename detection. I think it's clear by now that rename detection > > has won. > > > > > > Can you give us so

Re: authselect: what to do with systemd and nss-mdns that modify nsswith.conf

On Do, 06.12.18 14:58, Pavel Březina (pbrez...@redhat.com) wrote: > > Then there is nss-mymachines. It's primarily useful if > > systemd-machined or systemd-nspawn is used. Given that those are now > > part of the 'systemd-container' RPM it would be OK to also add > > nss-mymachines to nsswitch.co

Fedora Rawhide-20181206.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 5 of 47 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 28/131 (x86_64), 3/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Rawhide-201

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 02:48:32PM +, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2018-12-06, Florian Weimer wrote: > > In a sense, it's the old discussion between explicit rename recording > > and rename detection. I think it's clear by now that rename detection > > has won. > > > Can you give us some example of

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

On 2018-12-06, Florian Weimer wrote: > In a sense, it's the old discussion between explicit rename recording > and rename detection. I think it's clear by now that rename detection > has won. > Can you give us some example of a rename detection that works? If a packager cherry-picks patches, he

Re: Tracking translation status of a package built in koji

On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 6:34 PM Sundeep Anand wrote: > Hi Dominik, > > Thank you so much trying that out. Actually, to get stats saved for a > package, the package is to be added in Transtats, 'mkvtoolnix' > So, dry run of jobs (you must have unchecked it) will not bug you, with an > error. And, t

Bodhi update problems?

I've noticed the following two things happening the last couple of weeks... 1. When I add updates for one package and then type in a new name at the top and select the other package I want in the update the existing updates that are checked off turn into six digit numbers. 2. All of my updates st

Re: fedora-rawhide-kernel-nodebug is not getting updates

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 07:14:50AM -0600, Justin Forbes wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 7:47 AM Dan Horák wrote: > > > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 14:28:46 +0100 > > Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > > > Does anybody know why? > > > > > > Last kernel available there is 2 weeks old. > > > > > > https://dl.fed

Re: authselect: what to do with systemd and nss-mdns that modify nsswith.conf

On 06/12/2018 14:11, Florian Weimer wrote: * Tom Hughes: Based on my experimentation with an F29 live image last week both nss-systemd and nss-myhostname are in the default configuration. Not in the file shipped by the glibc package. Well something that has been installed as part of the liv

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 01:42:06PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > https://github.com/user-cont/source-git [...] > > We would love to take development off dist-git (but keep dist-git!) > > and move it to git repos with real source code which match upstream > > repositories. In such repo you have b

Re: authselect: what to do with systemd and nss-mdns that modify nsswith.conf

* Tom Hughes: > Based on my experimentation with an F29 live image last week both > nss-systemd and nss-myhostname are in the default configuration. Not in the file shipped by the glibc package. Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproje

Re: authselect: what to do with systemd and nss-mdns that modify nsswith.conf

* Lennart Poettering: > nss-myhostname should be in nsswitch.conf by default too. It's very > minimal, and just makes sure the local hostname remains resolvable all > the time. By enabling this, installers and image generators don't have > to patch /etc/hosts anymore like they traditionally did, i

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20181206.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20181205.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20181206.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 43 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:812.66

Re: authselect: what to do with systemd and nss-mdns that modify nsswith.conf

On 12/6/18 2:36 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Do, 06.12.18 12:20, Pavel Březina (pbrez...@redhat.com) wrote: Hello, Heya! systemd and nss-mdns packages modifies nsswitch.conf in their %post scriptlets which creates conflicts with authselect on systems that are configured by authselect. T

Re: authselect: what to do with systemd and nss-mdns that modify nsswith.conf

On 12/6/18 1:31 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: * Pavel Březina: systemd and nss-mdns packages modifies nsswitch.conf in their %post scriptlets which creates conflicts with authselect on systems that are configured by authselect. This needs to be solved somehow. Other packagers (notably sssd) have

Re: authselect: what to do with systemd and nss-mdns that modify nsswith.conf

On 06/12/2018 13:36, Lennart Poettering wrote: nss-systemd should be in nsswitch.conf by default. It's required for systemd's DynamicUser=1 option to work correctly, and that's core service functionality. Hence, given that systemd is Fedora's PID 1, nss-systemd should also be in nsswitch.conf un

Re: Fedora 29 Elections — Voting now open

On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 5:07 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Note that some answers in [2] seem to be mixed up (see [3]). > > Maybe wait with your votes until that is resolved. > Thank you for catching those, Miro. All of the issues with the questionnaires should now be fixed. If you notice anything els

Re: authselect: what to do with systemd and nss-mdns that modify nsswith.conf

On Do, 06.12.18 12:20, Pavel Březina (pbrez...@redhat.com) wrote: > Hello, Heya! > systemd and nss-mdns packages modifies nsswitch.conf in their %post > scriptlets which creates conflicts with authselect on systems that are > configured by authselect. This needs to be solved somehow. > > Origina

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

* Neal Gompa: > You're confusing this with trust. And yes, there's some trust to give > here, but keeping a (tiny) amount of friction for small patch sets > that increases as your patch load goes up just further encourages not > maintaining heavy patch loads. Heavy patch loads are just a fact of

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

* Neal Gompa: > The problem with merged source trees (aka source-git) is that it > implies forking projects. But that's true for *any* distribution that wants to integrate things. I guess you could govern everything by build flags eventually, but upstreams will rarely be willing to backport those

Re: Fedora Lifecycles: imagine longer-term possibilities

* Tomas Tomecek: >> * Matthew Miller: >> >> >> Make it cheap to maintain branches. I expect that one what to achieve >> this would be to build directly out of Git, with synthesized release >> numbers and changelogs. This way, you can apply a lot of fixes to >> multiple branches without encount

Re: authselect: what to do with systemd and nss-mdns that modify nsswith.conf

* Pavel Březina: > systemd and nss-mdns packages modifies nsswitch.conf in their %post > scriptlets which creates conflicts with authselect on systems that are > configured by authselect. This needs to be solved somehow. Other packagers (notably sssd) have made the required changes by requesting

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

On 12/6/18 7:04 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > >> And the other active maintainer (branto) and I don't have cycles to >> devote to keeping (any part of) it building on 32-bit archs. > > But people can always send patches. ;-) If someone else would like to take over as maintainer, I'm happy to g

Re: [HEADS UP] Ceph-14.x.x, dropping 32-bit archs

On 12/5/18 9:50 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > Kaleb, > > Firstly the title is misleading as there was no heads up, a heads up > is notice before you actually push the change, not when you do the > change. I suggest you take this up with branto. He's the one who built it without 32-bit archs without

Orphaned python-adns

Hi all. I just orphaned python-adns. I don't need it and don't plan to maintain it. The last upstream release was in 2007 and it does not support Python3. Also it FTBFS in rawhide. python-adns is required by transmission-remote-cli. Please consider removing the dependency, so that python-adns

Re: Atomic 29: ostree upgrade failed because of libdnf

On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 4:13 PM Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 12/5/18 5:14 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 6:57 PM Dusty Mabe du...@dustymabe.com>> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 12/4/18 11:40 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > > > > > > I will look at the configs and se

authselect: what to do with systemd and nss-mdns that modify nsswith.conf

Hello, systemd and nss-mdns packages modifies nsswitch.conf in their %post scriptlets which creates conflicts with authselect on systems that are configured by authselect. This needs to be solved somehow. Originally, I wanted to create an authselect command that can be used by packages on sy

Valgrind and Fedora debuginfo: best GUI

I have to debug certain BOINC Manager problems (C++ language), and instead of importing and building the whole source tree in a project in a SDK like Eclipse, I want to simply use the debuginfos already available in Fedora repository. Concerning GDB usage I can do that with QtCreator. It attaches t

Re: Fedora 29 Elections — Voting now open

Dne 06. 12. 18 v 1:36 Ben Cotton napsal(a): Voting is now open for the Fedora 29 election cycle. You can vote in the Elections app[1]. Interviews with candidates are available on the Fedora Community Blog[2], with links available in the Elections app. Voting ends at 23:59 UTC on 20 December. [1]