On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 1:21 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm cleaning up my packages a bit, and I currently maintain some leaf
> packages which aren't used by anything (or anything I use) at this
> point in time.
>
> The packages all have the go-sig as co-admin already, but I i
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Office Hours on 2018-10-23 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-modular...@chat.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to
answer them)!
Join us on
On dimanche 21 octobre 2018 00:10:03 CEST Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> Please feel free to ping me when you are looking for a reviewer in the
> future :)
If I can take your offer, I have yet another simple Golang package that I had
forgotten to do:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641822
> On 19. Oct 2018, at 13:17, Kefu Chai wrote:
>
> Hey, my name is Kefu Chai, and my nick name on IRC is kefu.
>
> I am a software developer using C++ and Python. I found that fmt[0] is a very
> good C++ library for C++ developers like me who whats to have python's
> str.format() in C++. But
test post
--
Aaron Gray
Independent Open Source Software Engineer, Computer Language Researcher,
Information Theorist, and amateur computer scientist.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@l
On Mo, 22.10.18 11:58, Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Anyway, the problem suggests to me that the default soft limit should
> not be raised until the kernel gets better recovery, so that
> applications won't trigger the issue by accident.
During the whole discussions we always made
On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 15:05, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>
> > I'm not able to parse this. This very thread is more information that
> > may get us to move it up in priority. Can you rephrase?
>
> I don't know what "Fedora management" values, or what is needed by the
> people who are doing the
On 10/22/18 11:14 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi writes:
> > On 10/21/18 6:12 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>
> > > years now. abompard has a few commits, he and pingu still answer mail
> > > but that's about it.
> >
> > Well, he has 980 commits, much more than anyone else.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 2:22 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On 10/22/18 9:49 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 12:40 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/22/18 7:35 AM, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
> abompard has a few commits, he and pingu still answer mail
> but that's about it
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> On 10/21/18 6:12 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > years now. abompard has a few commits, he and pingu still answer mail
> > but that's about it.
>
> Well, he has 980 commits, much more than anyone else.
Sure, but in the last couple of years there are only a couple
Brian (bex) Exelbierd writes:
> The question was genuine. Additionally, even at this site, the user
> profile doesn't seem to be present.
I doubt there is a user profile chapter or page for HyperKitty at the
Mailman project. If there is one, it would be in the HyperKitty docs
themselves.
>
On 10/22/18 9:49 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 12:40 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> On 10/22/18 7:35 AM, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
abompard has a few commits, he and pingu still answer mail
but that's about it.
>>>
>>> I agree that my activity on HyperKitty has slowed down a
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 12:40 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On 10/22/18 7:35 AM, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
> >> abompard has a few commits, he and pingu still answer mail
> >> but that's about it.
> >
> > I agree that my activity on HyperKitty has slowed down a lot these last
> > years, because I got i
On 10/22/18 7:35 AM, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
>> abompard has a few commits, he and pingu still answer mail
>> but that's about it.
>
> I agree that my activity on HyperKitty has slowed down a lot these last
> years, because I got involved with other projects too.
>
>> No, it can't, can it. Fedo
On Sat, 2018-10-20 at 13:03 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > I had checked mock-core-config [1] , which are in use in copr (I
> > guess)
> > and can't enable developer tools .
> > But on koji runs well , can you review this ? please .
> >
> > I could build azureus [4] on koji
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2018-10-22)
=
Meeting started by jforbes at 15:00:05 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-10-22/fesco.2018-10-22-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting s
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 11/133 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20181019.n.0):
ID: 299250 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_no_swap@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/299250
ID: 299299 Test: x86_
> abompard has a few commits, he and pingu still answer mail
> but that's about it.
I agree that my activity on HyperKitty has slowed down a lot these last years,
because I got involved with other projects too.
> No, it can't, can it. Fedora is not keeping up with upstream, which
> means that "
Hi,
As some of you have noticed a major rework of the forge macros has
finally landed in rawhide:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1155046
(helpers to package projects hosted on Gitlab, Github, Googlecode,
Bitbucket, etc)
It adds the ability to process multiple source
El jue, 11-10-2018 a las 12:53 -0400, Josh Boyer escribió:
> Hello Fedora Friends,
>
> I believe it's time for me to move on from my current role as the
> Council Engineering representative. When I resigned from FESCo a bit
> ago, I thought I could still fulfill this role. Unfortunately, that
>
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 3:05 AM Stephen J. Turnbull
wrote:
> Required disclosure: Mailman dev, and my sympathies are with the list
> advocates for this channel both for that reason, and for more
> objective ones. I don't really argue against a move to Discourse
> here, but I do know a bit about
- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Mailhot"
> To: "Jakub Cajka"
> Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 1:55:02 PM
> Subject: Re: PSA: builds using forge macros with tags broken on rawhide
>
> Le 2018-10-22 13:09, Jakub Cajka a écrit
Le 2018-10-22 13:09, Jakub Cajka a écrit :
I think that it would be reasonable to test the changes against the
Fedora package base before even pushing the change in to the rawhide.
This kind of unnecessary breakage is easily avoidable if you would
spent sometime on testing this by scratch rebuil
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-10-22 15:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Mailhot"
> To: "Robert-André Mauchin" , "Development
> discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Nicolas Mailhot"
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 10:00:40 AM
> Subject: Re: PSA: builds using forge macros with tags broken on rawhide
>
> Le lundi
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20181019.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20181021.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 7
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 100
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 23.94 MiB
Size of dropped packages:85.
* Lennart Poettering:
> On Fr, 19.10.18 09:12, Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>> >> (cross-posting to devel and desktop lists, ideally reply to both)
>> >
>> > Coincidentally, at All Systems Go! in Berlin last week I had some
>> > discussions with kernel people about RLIMIT_NOFILE de
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 2:06 PM Dridi Boukelmoune <
dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 5:15 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
> >
> > I don't know how to build Proton and the people who reported Proton
> works for them on Fedora are simply referring to the bundled Proton in
> Steam
Le lundi 22 octobre 2018 à 10:00 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> Le lundi 22 octobre 2018 à 00:31 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit :
> > Yeah all "gosetup -q" (which is gofed default) are broken because of
> > your commit:
>
> Well I know no such a thing, there was never any gosetup macro in
Le lundi 22 octobre 2018 à 10:00 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> Le lundi 22 octobre 2018 à 00:31 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit :
> > Yeah all "gosetup -q" (which is gofed default) are broken because of
> > your commit:
>
> Well I know no such a thing, there was never any gosetup macro in
Le lundi 22 octobre 2018 à 00:31 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit :
> Yeah all "gosetup -q" (which is gofed default) are broken because of
> your commit:
Well I know no such a thing, there was never any gosetup macro in the
macro set, and I think I told you a year ago I would not define a
goset
Hey everyone,
Having missed our first ship date, but still on track to potentially meet
our second, I am proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow and simply
take the time to get ready for the Blocker Review meeting an hour later at
16:00UTC.
If anyone has any important information that must be
32 matches
Mail list logo
