> Gerald Henriksen wrote:
>
>
> what rule is that?
>
> -- Rex
Maybe our guidelines [*] about bundling and duplication is threatened with
modularity.
Last but not least, if there's a CVE or soname bump in whatever library, we'd
need to rebuild the whole modularity stack depending. That would m
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/2 (x86_64)
ID: 286860 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/286860
Passed openQA tests: 1/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-co
On 09/22/2018 10:35 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> We're heading for a Fedora 29 release with a broken coq/frama-c/why3
> stack. I've got fixes waiting in the wings, but they're blocked on
> these antlr4 bugs:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596974
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
I've just orphaned rpms/fedora-review-plugin-java.
This package was recently assigned to me in mass ownership reassignment
and I did not realize I was the owner, until now.
I never intended to maintain this package.
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
_
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 02:02:37PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
…
> I already said that before: I don't think we can tell packagers to use the
> new guidelines page until the majority of formatting and content issues is
> fixed.
The new layout looks more user-friendly to me and could attract more
Hi all.
I'm orphaning 'mozilla-requestpolicy' package.
Feel free to adopt it.
Best regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital si
Ok when I have some free time text and let you know if I notice any problems
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 02:02:37PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We have moved packaging guidelines onto docs.fedoraproject.org[0].
> If you find any error or would like to change something, don't hesitate to
> open ticket or submit pull request for packaging committee repo[1].
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 01:10:32PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 11:42:58AM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> > There's a request for the nvme-cli package to generate a unique name
> > to use when connecting to NVMe-over-fabrics targets:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 11:42:58AM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> There's a request for the nvme-cli package to generate a unique name
> to use when connecting to NVMe-over-fabrics targets:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1633814
>
> I'm wondering what the right approach is. F
On 09/25/2018 02:08 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It's 3.30.1 release this week and you all know the drill for megaupdates
> in Fedora :) We have f29-gnome tag for building and I'll collect all the
> builds that are tagged with f29-gnome and put them in Bodhi once
> everything is built.
I
11 matches
Mail list logo
