No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/132 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180917.n.1):
ID: 283832 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/283832
ID: 283833 Test: x86_64
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/132 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 284048 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/284048
ID: 284064 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinsta
On Fri, 2018-09-21 at 21:55 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 06:14:51PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > So do we really need these acres of 'optional' packages in comps? I
> > mean, there are 2519 of them in comps-f30.xml.in. That's a lot. I
> > suspect no-one's looked wheth
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 06:14:51PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> So do we really need these acres of 'optional' packages in comps? I
> mean, there are 2519 of them in comps-f30.xml.in. That's a lot. I
> suspect no-one's looked whether most of them make any sense for years.
> There are entire grou
Hi folks!
I am currently working on finding and removing all comps entries that
point to packages which don't exist any more.
There are quite a lot of them.
A lot of them are 'optional' entries.
While doing this extremely tedious task, it occurred to me to think:
what the hell is the *point* of
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 at 15:11, stan wrote:
>
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:36:22 +0300
> Vascom wrote:
>
> > I don't know. You can see at Asus 1225C.
> >
> > пт, 21 сент. 2018 г., 20:35 stan :
> >
> > > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 19:31:12 +0300
> > > Vascom wrote:
> > >
> > > > I can't switch to any tty.
> >
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 20:36:22 +0300
Vascom wrote:
> I don't know. You can see at Asus 1225C.
>
> пт, 21 сент. 2018 г., 20:35 stan :
>
> > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 19:31:12 +0300
> > Vascom wrote:
> >
> > > I can't switch to any tty.
> >
> > Are you by chance using a keyboard with an F-lock key?
OLD: Fedora-29-20180918.n.0
NEW: Fedora-29-20180919.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 1
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180917.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180919.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:115
Upgraded packages: 115
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 38.74 MiB
Size of dropped packages:4
I don't know. You can see at Asus 1225C.
пт, 21 сент. 2018 г., 20:35 stan :
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 19:31:12 +0300
> Vascom wrote:
>
> > I can't switch to any tty.
>
> Are you by chance using a keyboard with an F-lock key? I get burned by
> that every once in a while.
> __
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 19:31:12 +0300
Vascom wrote:
> I can't switch to any tty.
Are you by chance using a keyboard with an F-lock key? I get burned by
that every once in a while.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe sen
- Original Message -
> From: "Antonio Trande"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2018 2:53:57 PM
> Subject: python2-future on fedora 30+
>
> Hi all.
>
> Are we ready for excluding python2-future on fedora 30+ ?
>
> $ dnf repoquery --rel
I can't switch to any tty.
пт, 21 сент. 2018 г., 19:14 Adam Williamson :
> On Fri, 2018-09-21 at 07:04 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Chris Murphy
> > wrote:
> > > Add systemd.debug-shell=1 boot parameter at the grub menu, then
> > > switch to tty9 once s
On Fri, 2018-09-21 at 07:04 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Chris Murphy
> wrote:
> > Add systemd.debug-shell=1 boot parameter at the grub menu, then
> > switch to tty9 once startup has failed.
>
> We only have tty1 through tty6?
With that parameter system
BUG util.py:439: Problem 1: package gnupg2-2.2.9-1.fc29.armv7hl
> > requires
> > libgnutls.so.30, but none of the providers can be installed
> > DEBUG util.py:439: - package gnutls-3.6.3-4.fc30.armv7hl
> > requires
> > crypto-policies, but none of the providers
n be installed
DEBUG util.py:439:- package gnutls-3.6.3-4.fc30.armv7hl requires
crypto-policies, but none of the providers can be installed
DEBUG util.py:439:- conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:439:- nothing provides /usr/bin/grubby needed by
crypto-policies-20180921-1.git391ed9f.fc30.
the providers can be installed
DEBUG util.py:439:- package gnutls-3.6.3-4.fc30.armv7hl requires
crypto-policies, but none of the providers can be installed
DEBUG util.py:439:- conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:439:- nothing provides /usr/bin/grubby needed by
crypto-policies-201809
On 09/21/2018 04:17 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=29796611
It's not very clear what the actual error is, but I am fairly sure
that I have uploaded the correct sources for this:
$ fedpkg new-sources libguestfs-1.39.10.tar.gz
/usr/lib/python2.7
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=29796611
It's not very clear what the actual error is, but I am fairly sure
that I have uploaded the correct sources for this:
$ fedpkg new-sources libguestfs-1.39.10.tar.gz
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/bodhi.py:48: Deprecati
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 9:23 AM Antonio Trande wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> Are we ready for excluding python2-future on fedora 30+ ?
>
> $ dnf repoquery --release rawhide --enablerepo=*-source
> --disablerepo=rpmfusion* --whatrequires python2-future
>
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:00 ago on ve
Hi all.
Are we ready for excluding python2-future on fedora 30+ ?
$ dnf repoquery --release rawhide --enablerepo=*-source
--disablerepo=rpmfusion* --whatrequires python2-future
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:00 ago on ven 21 set 2018 14:41:49
CEST.
buildbot-0:1.3.0-1.fc29.src
buildbot-mas
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Chris Murphy
wrote:
Add systemd.debug-shell=1 boot parameter at the grub menu, then
switch to tty9 once startup has failed.
We only have tty1 through tty6?
Michael
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.
Hi,
I'm updating all Qt 5 packages in rawhide now. Until all this is done, you may
experience broken dependencies for packages using Qt 5.
Regards,
Jan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...
We updated python-matplotlib to 3.0.0. It only supports Python 3. This
was done in Rawhide only.
The python2-matplotlib* subpackages were moved to a new SRPM,
python2-matplotlib (remains at 2.2.x), as plenty of cruft still needs
them :(
If you experience some relevant trouble (conflicts betw
On 9/20/18 6:47 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> There was a bug[1] filed recently that indicated that printing was
>>> broken on certain printers. As a result of that discussion, it became
>>> apparent that there was no criteria for printing to
On 20/09/2018 21:30, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 18:17, Jonathan Underwood
In the process of orphaning a few packages lately, I noticed that the
user "cicku" (Christopher Meng) still had commit or admin privelidges
on the package. That user hasn't been active for a couple
I can't switch to tty9. System not responding on Ctrl+Alt+F9.
Here screenshot of stuck phase https://imgur.com/a/yDRtRrP
чт, 20 сент. 2018 г. в 17:37, Chris Murphy :
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018, 5:05 AM Vascom wrote:
>>
>> Hi all.
>>
>> I have big bug with Fedora 29 Beta Candidate 1.5.
>> Live-u
27 matches
Mail list logo
