No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 14/132 (x86_64), 4/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180912.n.0):
ID: 279381 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/279381
ID: 279384 Test: x86_6
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180912.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180913.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 53
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 371.45 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On 13/09/18 22:16, Danishka Navin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on a project that require a fedora spin with firefox which point
> to specific web url as the default home page.
> This will be applicable to all users and I could not find anything on skell
> directory against mozilla.
>
> I have ma
On 13.9.2018 22:44, Petr Šabata wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 04:43:15PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hi,
I was thinking about this for a while and I got the impression that this is
something I don't know the answer for. The question is a bit harder to
formulate simply, so let put it in examples
Release status of the Fedora 29 Beta is NO-GO.
Due to in-progress RC2 for the F29 Beta release and presence of
blocker bugs, the decision is “No Go”. The Beta release slips for one
week to “Target #1” date (September 25th)[1]. We are not going to slip
the Final GA yet.
For more information please
On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 04:43:15PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was thinking about this for a while and I got the impression that this is
> something I don't know the answer for. The question is a bit harder to
> formulate simply, so let put it in examples:
I see no one's really respond
Hi,
I am working on a project that require a fedora spin with firefox which
point to specific web url as the default home page.
This will be applicable to all users and I could not find anything on skell
directory against mozilla.
I have manually altered (just for testing) vim
/home/liveuser/.mo
Hi all.
I'm going to retire the packages 'nini' and 'smuxi' on rawhide within
24h since now. Both upstream project look like over.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signat
On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 12:15 AM, Manas Mangaonkar
wrote:
>> Fedora is already in glibc 2.28 it is possible to do the > > same approach
>
> TBH I don't really know how that'd be done with the current package,would
> love to learn.
>
Please take a look at my slides :
https://schd.ws/hosted_files/os
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Tomas Orsava wrote:
> Hi!
> We'd like to propose a new functionality for dnf: When a user tries to
> install a package XYZ and dnf doesn't find it, dnf would recommend them
> alternative packages. These offered packages would advertise that they are
> an alternati
On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 16:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10-09-18 14:40, Abhiram Kuchibhotla wrote:
> > According to the LICENSE file in their git repo, the code in the repo seems
> > to be gplv2. Not sure if that proves anything. I'll do the licensecheck -r
> > later and update you
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 12:58 PM Tomas Orsava wrote:
>
> On 09/13/2018 06:43 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 18:17 +0200, Tomas Orsava wrote:
> >> We'd like to propose a new functionality for dnf: When a user tries
> >> to install a package XYZ and dnf doesn't find it, dnf woul
On 09/13/2018 06:43 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 18:17 +0200, Tomas Orsava wrote:
We'd like to propose a new functionality for dnf: When a user tries
to install a package XYZ and dnf doesn't find it, dnf would recommend
them alternative packages. These offered packages would a
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 06:17:39PM +0200, Tomas Orsava wrote:
> Hi!
> We'd like to propose a new functionality for dnf: When a user tries to
> install a package XYZ and dnf doesn't find it, dnf would recommend them
> alternative packages. These offered packages would advertise that they are
> an al
On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 18:17 +0200, Tomas Orsava wrote:
> We'd like to propose a new functionality for dnf: When a user tries
> to install a package XYZ and dnf doesn't find it, dnf would recommend
> them alternative packages. These offered packages would advertise
> that they are an alternative for
Hi!
We'd like to propose a new functionality for dnf: When a user tries to
install a package XYZ and dnf doesn't find it, dnf would recommend them
alternative packages. These offered packages would advertise that they
are an alternative for XYZ using a specially formatted Provides tag.
For ex
While rebasing indent package to a fresh new 2.2.12 release (done
after 8 years), I corrected license declaration from "GPLv3+" to
"GPLv3+ and BSD and Verbatim".
-- Petr
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
Hi,
On 10-09-18 14:40, Abhiram Kuchibhotla wrote:
According to the LICENSE file in their git repo, the code in the repo seems to
be gplv2. Not sure if that proves anything. I'll do the licensecheck -r later
and update you guys.
On Mon 10 Sep, 2018, 6:08 PM Richard Shaw, mailto:hobbes1...@gmai
Hi all,
It turns out mozjs60 60.2.0 (in F29 updates-testing and rawhide)
silently broke ABI and that broke gjs that gnome-shell uses. I've
rebuilt gjs; if you've already updated and can't log in, then
gjs-1.54.0-3.fc29 and gjs-1.54.0-3.fc30 should help.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FE
19 matches
Mail list logo
