Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2018-08-02 16:00 UTC)

  Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2018-08-02 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net.   Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2018-08-02 09:00 PDT  US/Pacific 2018-08-0

Re: binutils 2.31.1-4.fc29 - 2.31.1-7.fc29 produces broken ELF binaries

On 07/31/2018 12:18 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: I'm attaching a list of affected packages in the Fedora rawhide buildroot, as of 2018-07-31 10:00.  This is based on ELF files which have a .gnu.build.attributes section (which is not allocated) between two allocated sections.  (The rawhide compose

Re: Guideline change: glibc malloc as the C/C++/Rust allocator

On 07/27/2018 06:43 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 07/26/2018 06:03 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>> "FW" == Florian Weimer writes: >> >> FW> I would like to request a change of the Packaging Guidelines, >> FW> advising packagers not to interpose malloc. >> >> How strong of a restriction

Fedora Rawhide-20180801.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 66/138 (x86_64), 24/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180731.n.0): ID: 262444 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/262444 ID: 262488 Test:

Re: [fedora-arm] cmake segfault on 32-bit arches on Rawhide

On Wed, 2018-08-01 at 20:02 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 9:58 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > I just tried a rebuild of a package in Rawhide, it worked on most > > arches, but failed on armv7hl and i686 (our only 32-bit arches). On > > both arches, cmake seems to have se

Re: [fedora-arm] cmake segfault on 32-bit arches on Rawhide

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 9:58 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > I just tried a rebuild of a package in Rawhide, it worked on most > arches, but failed on armv7hl and i686 (our only 32-bit arches). On > both arches, cmake seems to have segfaulted: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2

Fedora testing-20180801.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Fedora updates-20180801.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) Installed system changes in test x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 0.61 to 0.28 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/262261#downloads Current test data: https://

Fw: Re: [fedora-arm] Resizing the root partition when loading on a Raspberry Pi 3 B+

Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On August 1, 2018 5:35 PM, BunnyApocalypse wrote: > In my experience on the 3 B+, these were the commands that I needed to run: > > growpart /dev/mmcblk 0 3 > pvresize /dev/mmcblk0p3 > lvextend -l 100%FREE /d

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180801.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180731.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180801.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 3 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 320 Downgraded packages: 2 Size of added packages: 16.86 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20180731.n.0 compose check report

Hi, On 01-08-18 17:33, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 20:29 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 60/138 (x86_64), 23/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180730.n.0): So the big change here is a

Re: Welcome Christopher King!

Thank you so much for the warm welcome Rishi! I would also like to thank everyone who has been helping in the review process. I look forward to continuing my contributions to the Fedora project moving forward. -Chris ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On August 1, 2018 3:25 PM, Debarshi Ray wro

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20180731.n.0 compose check report

On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 20:29 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > No missing expected images. > > Failed openQA tests: 60/138 (x86_64), 23/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) > > New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180730.n.0): So the big change here is a kernel bug that showed up, which affects

Welcome Christopher King!

Hello everybody, I have just sponsored Christopher King (IRC, FAS: bunnyapocalypse) into the 'packager' group. He has been doing some great work getting the WPE port of WebKit into Fedora: * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601058 * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601

glibc 2.28 rebase has landed in rawhide

rawhide has been updated to glibc 2.28. I do not expect any issues because we have been importing development snapshots during the past six months, but if there any, please let us know ASAP. Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedo

Re: "TLS reference ... mismatches non-TLS reference"

Vít Ondruch writes: > Dne 1.8.2018 v 13:48 Dave Love napsal(a): >> I've been trying to build a new version of the scorep package with >> %check running make check. A couple of days ago it failed with strange >> link errors concerning symbols not found which are defined in the >> libraries it was

Re: RFC: make $releasever return "rawhide" on Rawhide

Dne 1.8.2018 v 13:09 Kamil Paral napsal(a): > On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Vít Ondruch > wrote: > > I'm somehow missing the point probably, but as a rawhide user, > when I want to take some package from F28 (typically kernel), then > I have to do "sudo

Re: "TLS reference ... mismatches non-TLS reference"

Dne 1.8.2018 v 13:48 Dave Love napsal(a): > I've been trying to build a new version of the scorep package with > %check running make check. A couple of days ago it failed with strange > link errors concerning symbols not found which are defined in the > libraries it was linking against (apparent

"TLS reference ... mismatches non-TLS reference"

I've been trying to build a new version of the scorep package with %check running make check. A couple of days ago it failed with strange link errors concerning symbols not found which are defined in the libraries it was linking against (apparently in the right order). Now it's failing on rawhide

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove Excessive Linking

On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 10:21:42AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote: > Note from Change Wrangler: This Change Proposal requires mass rebuild. > However, two weeks ago (June 19th), we have already passed the > deadline for Change proposals requiring mass rebuild. I will leave the > decision whether this Chang

Re: RFC: make $releasever return "rawhide" on Rawhide

On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > I'm somehow missing the point probably, but as a rawhide user, when I want > to take some package from F28 (typically kernel), then I have to do "sudo > dnf update --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=updates{,-testing} kernel\* > --release 28", i.e.

Re: Review swap, Perl flavored

On Tuesday, 31 July 2018 23.12.22 WEST Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > Hello, > > > Today is my first year anniversary of contributing to Fedora, yay us! Congratulations for all your (hard) work Robert-André. :-) Regards, -- José Abílio ___ devel maili

Re: Making Fedora secure - Package exit policy for security

On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 10:40:20AM +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote: > On 07/31/2018 08:51 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > > > Do we have any analysis showing what would be the fallout if we applied > > these purge rules today ? ie what packages would be dropped today due > > to unaddressed C

Re: Updates to mathematical software

Hi Jerry, On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 19:09:02 -0600 Jerry James wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 4:36 AM Paul Howarth > wrote: > > On Mon, 28 May 2018 21:03:34 -0600 > > Jerry James wrote: > > > It looks like the giac, Macaulay2, and sagemath stacks are the > > > only pari consumers. There is also

Re: RFC: make $releasever return "rawhide" on Rawhide

I'm somehow missing the point probably, but as a rawhide user, when I want to take some package from F28 (typically kernel), then I have to do "sudo dnf update --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=updates{,-testing} kernel\* --release 28", i.e. the problem is that I have to enable the "updates" repositorie

Re: Orphaning winswitch

Is it still maintained by upstream? On 01/08/2018 02:18, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > On 29 July 2018 at 19:14, Jonathan Underwood > wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> I haven't used winswitch for a few years now, and haven't really got >> the bandwidth to maintain the package, and so I plan to orphan it i

Re: Making Fedora secure - Package exit policy for security

On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 10:33:11AM +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote: > On 07/31/2018 08:33 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > > >> 1. If a CRITICAL or IMPORTANT security issue is open against a package > >> in Fedora-X and by the time X is EOL and the issue is not addressed, > >> proactively remove the packa

Re: Making Fedora secure - Package exit policy for security

On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 09:09 +0530, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala wrote: > Hi All, > > I was asked to bring this issue[1] to the developer community before > FESCO makes a decision. > > In several instances[2] there exists packages in Fedora, in which > package-maintainers did not patch security issues, for

Re: Intent to retire python-svgwrite

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 03:25:49PM -0400, Robert Brown wrote: >Got it. Thanks. I'm not sure what to do at this point. Log out and log back into src.fp.o, groups are synced upon login :) Pierre ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org