Re: tool to order packages by build dependencies (rpmbuild-order)

On Thu, 2018-07-26 at 14:20 +0900, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > You can try it from my copr repo: > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/petersen/rpmbuild-order Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides libHSexplicit-exception-0.1.9.2-6IciBnUHzJA6pzrqvgpq00-ghc8.2.2.so()(64b

Re: [fesco] Updated FTBFS package policy

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 8:29 AM Anoop C S wrote: > On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 15:46 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Fedora package maintainers, > > > > FESCo approved an updated policy for packages which fail to build from > > source during mass rebuilds (FTBFS) [1]. > > > > The updated

Re: [fesco] Updated FTBFS package policy

Dne 26.7.2018 v 08:21 Anoop C S napsal(a): > On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 15:46 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> Fedora package maintainers, >> >> FESCo approved an updated policy for packages which fail to build from >> source during mass rebuilds (FTBFS) [1]. >> >> The updated policy is st

Re: jplesnik pushed to perl-XML-Parser (master). "Specify all dependencies"

Dne 23.7.2018 v 16:40 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > Dne 23.7.2018 v 15:28 Florian Weimer napsal(a): >> On 07/23/2018 02:35 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>> >>> Dne 23.7.2018 v 14:19 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): Dne 23.7.2018 v 14:14 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski napsal(a): > On Monday, 23 July 2018 at

Re: [fesco] Updated FTBFS package policy

On Fri, 2018-05-25 at 15:46 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Fedora package maintainers, > > FESCo approved an updated policy for packages which fail to build from > source during mass rebuilds (FTBFS) [1]. > > The updated policy is still at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_b

Re: tool to order packages by build dependencies (rpmbuild-order)

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 7:29 AM Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > Hi, > > This is an early announcement about a tool called 'rpmbuild-order' I made > to sort RPM-based packages in build dependency order. I am not sure if such > a tool exists already? Certainly some tools like `mockchain` can already

tool to order packages by build dependencies (rpmbuild-order)

Hi, This is an early announcement about a tool called 'rpmbuild-order' I made to sort RPM-based packages in build dependency order. I am not sure if such a tool exists already? Certainly some tools like `mockchain` can already order builds in this way, but I don't know of such a standalone utilit

Re: [atomic-devel] Starting a Container SIG

I'm interested in a container technology, so I'd like to help the SIG. On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Tim Orling wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 2:42 PM Dusty Mabe wrote: >> >> >> >> On 07/25/2018 01:09 PM, Clement Verna wrote: >> > >> > Please Reply if you're interested with helping out

Re: [atomic-devel] Starting a Container SIG

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 2:42 PM Dusty Mabe wrote: > > > On 07/25/2018 01:09 PM, Clement Verna wrote: > > > > Please Reply if you're interested with helping out making the > > Container story great in Fedora. If there is a good response, I will > > create a Container SIG wiki page, and I guess we

Re: /results_* and /*.rpm in .gitignore

On 07/25/2018 11:59 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: Tim Landscheidt wrote: Todd Zullinger wrote: […] For example, the rpmlint's .gitignore contains the following¹: /*.rpm /results_rpmlint/ /rpmlint-*/ /rpmlint-*.tar.gz […] Apropos: Many .gitignores only reference the source files, i. e

[Fedora-packaging] Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2018-07-26 16:00 UTC)

  Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2018-07-26 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net.   Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2018-07-26 09:00 PDT  US/Pacific 2018-07-26

Re: Release rpkg-1.55 and fedpkg-1.34

On 25.7.2018 15:50, Chenxiong Qi wrote: Hi, New version rpkg-1.55 and fedpkg-1.34 are released. Release notes: * rpkg: https://docs.pagure.org/rpkg/releases/1.55.html that says: rpkg works with Python 2.6, 2.7 and 3.6. * fedpkg: https://docs.pagure.org/fedpkg/releases/1.34.html that says

Re: [atomic-devel] Starting a Container SIG

On 07/25/2018 01:09 PM, Clement Verna wrote: > > Please Reply if you're interested with helping out making the > Container story great in Fedora. If there is a good response, I will > create a Container SIG wiki page, and I guess we can ask for > container-devel mailing list for SIG discussions.

[Bug 1601289] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601289 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.12-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1601286] perl-DB_File-1.842 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601286 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DB_File-1.842-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1601131] perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601131 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.22-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail becaus

Fedora updates-20180725.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap

Re: Starting a Container SIG

I too want to help in any way I can. On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Clement Verna wrote: > Greeting all, > > The container effort in Fedora has until now been looked after by the > Atomic WG, since this Working Group is now going to focus mostly on > Fedora CoreOS, I propose to create a new co

Fedora testing-20180725.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) Installed system changes in test x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default: System load changed from 0.35 to 0.19 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/26

[Bug 1601289] perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601289 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Mail-JMAPTalk-0.12-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1601131] perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601131 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-POE-Client-TCP-1.22-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail becaus

[Bug 1601286] perl-DB_File-1.842 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601286 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DB_File-1.842-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

Re: Starting a Container SIG

Hi, I'm not familiar with the container technology, but I will love to learn it. I would like to help with this SIG. Br, El mié., 25 de jul. de 2018 1:57 PM, Clement Verna escribió: > Greeting all, > > The container effort in Fedora has until now been looked after by the > Atomic WG, since thi

Re: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found on s390x and armv7hl: .s390x.debug.#dwz#

On 07/23/2018 12:36 PM, Dan Horák wrote: On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:43:43 +0200 Mark Wielaard wrote: On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 10:52:38PM +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote: Hello. I try build new version of perdition package. It build fine (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28526416) o

[Bug 1376845] The license tag should mention GPL+ or Artistic

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376845 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com --- Comment

Re: Starting a Container SIG

On 07/25/2018 01:09 PM, Clement Verna wrote: Greeting all, The container effort in Fedora has until now been looked after by the Atomic WG, since this Working Group is now going to focus mostly on Fedora CoreOS, I propose to create a new container SIG to regroup people interested in the maintena

Re: F28: Mismatch between the program and library build versions detected, gcc-c++, wxGTK3

On Wed, 25 Jul 2018, Wolfgang Stoeggl wrote: Hello, a recent F28 update build of poedit [1] shows the following message after starting: Warning: Mismatch between the program and library build versions detected. The library used 3.0 (wchar_t,compiler with C++ ABI 1012,wx containers,compatible

Starting a Container SIG

Greeting all, The container effort in Fedora has until now been looked after by the Atomic WG, since this Working Group is now going to focus mostly on Fedora CoreOS, I propose to create a new container SIG to regroup people interested in the maintenance of application containers in Fedora. This

Re: Source tarballs are being placed in git?

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 4:48 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > "new-sources" should not be mentioned in basic documentation. These should > be added via means of "fedpkg import package.srpm". > > The workflow for new package is then: > > ~~~ > $ fedpkg import mypackage.srpm > $ git commit -m "initial im

Re: /results_* and /*.rpm in .gitignore (was: Source tarballs are being placed in git?)

Tim Landscheidt wrote: > Todd Zullinger wrote: > >> […] > >> For example, the rpmlint's .gitignore contains the >> following¹: > >> /*.rpm >> /results_rpmlint/ >> /rpmlint-*/ >> /rpmlint-*.tar.gz > >> […] > > Apropos: Many .gitignores only reference the source files, > i. e. not /results_${na

Re: Source tarballs are being placed in git?

Thomas Moschny wrote: > 2018-07-24 20:28 GMT+02:00 Todd Zullinger : >> Years >> ago, I submitted a patch to fedpkg/rpkg to have it resepct >> the existing .gitignore, such that if you have a pattern >> which matches the source being added, fedpkg won't add >> another entry. > > My impression was t

Re: Source tarballs are being placed in git?

Dne 25.7.2018 v 13:53 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 01:48:58PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> >> Dne 24.7.2018 v 22:24 Gerald B. Cox napsal(a): >>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Artur Iwicki >> > wrote: >>> >>> That section o

Release rpkg-1.55 and fedpkg-1.34

Hi, New version rpkg-1.55 and fedpkg-1.34 are released. Release notes: * rpkg: https://docs.pagure.org/rpkg/releases/1.55.html * fedpkg: https://docs.pagure.org/fedpkg/releases/1.34.html Bodhi updates: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?builds=fedpkg-1.34-1.fc27&builds=fedpkg-1.34-1.fc2

Re: Source tarballs are being placed in git?

2018-07-24 20:28 GMT+02:00 Todd Zullinger : > Years > ago, I submitted a patch to fedpkg/rpkg to have it resepct > the existing .gitignore, such that if you have a pattern > which matches the source being added, fedpkg won't add > another entry. My impression was that this is actually implemented

[Bug 1601452] perl-Net-DNS-1.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601452 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Net-DNS-1.16 is|perl-Net-DNS-1.17 is

Re: Source tarballs are being placed in git?

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 01:48:58PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 24.7.2018 v 22:24 Gerald B. Cox napsal(a): > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Artur Iwicki > > wrote: > > > > That section of the guide is a bit poorly worded. You should *not* > > us

Re: Source tarballs are being placed in git?

Dne 24.7.2018 v 22:24 Gerald B. Cox napsal(a): > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Artur Iwicki > wrote: > > That section of the guide is a bit poorly worded. You should *not* > use "git add" on source tarballs. These should be added only via > means of

Re: Unannounced soname bump: libconfig

On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 5:10:06 PM CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > This build: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1130189 > > changed the soname from libconfig.so.9 to libconfig.so.11 thus > breaking a number of packages. I'm sorry for bad coordination in [1] I didn't

Re: libbibutils 6.6 update with soname bump in epel7

Jens-Ulrik, Add me as co-maintainer to this packages too please. -- Best regards, Vasiliy Glazov ср, 25 июл. 2018 г. в 12:40, Vascom : > Hi, > I am updating libbibutils to 6.6. It has soname bump from 5 to 6 in EPEL 7 > repo. > > Need update dependent packages: > ghc-hs-bibutils > pandoc-citepro

[Bug 1605402] perl-Authen-Krb5-Admin: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1605402 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

libbibutils 6.6 update with soname bump in epel7

Hi, I am updating libbibutils to 6.6. It has soname bump from 5 to 6 in EPEL 7 repo. Need update dependent packages: ghc-hs-bibutils pandoc-citeproc As I understand rebuild not needed for rawhide/F29? -- Best regards, Vasiliy Glazov ___ devel mailing l