= Proposed System Wide Change: Zchunk Metadata =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Zchunk_Metadata
Owner(s):
* Jonathan Dieter
* Neal Gompa
All dnf repository metadata will be compressed with the zchunk format
rather than xz or gzip.
== Detailed description ==
Currently Fedora's re
Nicolas,
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 1:23 PM Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
> The safe part is just to update the Fedora font packages to the latest
> upstream version of the fonts if we do not ship it yet. You can ignore
> byte-equivalency, fortunately font libs are robust enough they do not
> depend on a p
On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 01:37 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 2.7.2018 01:20, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > Hmm I was under the impression that PyString_AsString does not
> > > exist
> > > in Python3
> > > and you'll have to use PyUnicode_AsEncodedString. Was it actually
> > > compiling with
> > > previo
On 2.7.2018 01:20, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hmm I was under the impression that PyString_AsString does not exist
in Python3
and you'll have to use PyUnicode_AsEncodedString. Was it actually
compiling with
previous versions of Python3?
I was testing disable python2 [1], to see what happen but copr ra
On Fri, 2018-06-29 at 05:08 -0400, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Sérgio Basto"
> > To: "Fedora devel"
> > Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 1:55:52 AM
> > Subject: Re: Your package doesn't build with Python 3.7
> >
> > On Thu, 2018-06-28 at 20:41 +0200, Miro
On Sunday, 01 July 2018 at 18:56, po...@pouar.net wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2018 10:23:36 +0200
> Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > On 1.7.2018 02:21, po...@pouar.net wrote:
> > > Brotli 1.0.5 is out and I might update it in Rawhide, but the tool I
> > > used to check ABI differences seems to have stopped w
On 07/01/2018 12:03 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Epylog is a python27 program and I have not had the time to convert it
to python3 and won't until later this fall. As I don't want this to be
a FTBFS during rebuilds.. I see the following:
1. Retire it in rawhide
2. Make it a python27 module?
On 1.7.2018 23:14, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 1 July 2018 at 15:38, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 1.7.2018 21:03, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Epylog is a python27 program and I have not had the time to convert it
to python3 and won't until later this fall. As I don't want this to be
a FTBFS duri
On 1 July 2018 at 18:43, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 1.7.2018 23:14, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>
>> On 1 July 2018 at 15:38, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1.7.2018 21:03, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Epylog is a python27 program and I have not had the time to convert it
to pyt
On 1 July 2018 at 15:38, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 1.7.2018 21:03, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>
>> Epylog is a python27 program and I have not had the time to convert it
>> to python3 and won't until later this fall. As I don't want this to be
>> a FTBFS during rebuilds.. I see the following:
>>
On 1.7.2018 21:03, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Epylog is a python27 program and I have not had the time to convert it
to python3 and won't until later this fall. As I don't want this to be
a FTBFS during rebuilds.. I see the following:
1. Retire it in rawhide
2. Make it a python27 module?
I am
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 6/138 (x86_64), 23/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180630.n.0):
ID: 254078 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/254078
ID: 254135 Test: x86_64
Epylog is a python27 program and I have not had the time to convert it
to python3 and won't until later this fall. As I don't want this to be
a FTBFS during rebuilds.. I see the following:
1. Retire it in rawhide
2. Make it a python27 module?
I am looking for advise on which people would recommen
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180630.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180701.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 46
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 484.94 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On Sun, 1 Jul 2018 10:23:36 +0200
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 1.7.2018 02:21, po...@pouar.net wrote:
> > Brotli 1.0.5 is out and I might update it in Rawhide, but the tool I
> > used to check ABI differences seems to have stopped working on both
> > Arch and Fedora. So I'm not sure if Brolti include
Hello Germano,
I've been doing some packaging work for nextcloud 13+ in Fedora (not so
much recently, although I just started to get some missing deps of NC 14
packaged and reviewed).
I could probably invest the occasional hour or two for the new spec, so
feel free to sign me up. My GH nick is Lor
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2018-07-02
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
We didn't meet for a few weeks, so let's get together tomorrow. Fedora
29 development is getting to a
On 1.7.2018 02:21, po...@pouar.net wrote:
Brotli 1.0.5 is out and I might update it in Rawhide, but the tool I used
to check ABI differences seems to have stopped working on both Arch and
Fedora. So I'm not sure if Brolti included any ABI/API breaking changes.
Should I push an update anyway?
I
On 06/28/2018 02:39 PM, Nick Clifton wrote:
Hi Dave, Hi Florian,
Right - there is a new annobin rpm available - annobin-8.0-1.el8 - which
has these changes:
* Weak symbols are not generated by the annobin plugin
when compiling with -ffunction-sections.
There was no poi
19 matches
Mail list logo
