Re: F29 System Wide Change: Make BootLoaderSpec the default

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 05:26:37PM -0400, Kyle Marek wrote: > Kernel updates are different. You *have* to reboot in order to run the > new kernel (except for security updates applied with kpatch) and a > broken kernel has the potential to simply lock up without even launching > /sbin/init, for exam

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2018-07-02)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018-07-02 15:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

nextcloud-client packaging help wanted

Hello, I am the maintainer of nextcloud-client. I am writing to ask for help in maintaining nextcloud-client. Actually nextcloud-client is just a nextcloud themed version[1] of owncloud-client[2]. The new nextcloud-client[3] instead is still at a very alpha state. We used to be 5 maintainers, but a

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Make BootLoaderSpec the default

On 06/29/2018 04:33 PM, Lars Seipel wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 03:17:53PM -0400, Kyle Marek wrote: >> On 06/25/2018 02:49 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >>> But it's useful for unattended systems in general, be it servers or >>> appliances: if a boot fails there generally should be a way to re

Re: F29 System Wide Change: Make BootLoaderSpec the default

On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 03:17:53PM -0400, Kyle Marek wrote: > On 06/25/2018 02:49 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > But it's useful for unattended systems in general, be it servers or > > appliances: if a boot fails there generally should be a way to recover > > the system through rebooting without

Re: python-sphinx_rtd_theme advice

Le mercredi 06 juin 2018 à 19:05 -0600, Jerry James a écrit : > We have fontawesome-fonts-web, which was needless ignorance of Fedora guidelines BTW > Since the .ttf files of those fonts are not byte-equivalent to the > ones we ship ... I'm not sure what is safe to do here. The safe part is ju

Re: python-sphinx_rtd_theme advice

Le mercredi 06 juin 2018 à 19:05 -0600, Jerry James a écrit : > I somehow wound up owning python-sphinx_rtd_theme, I think probably > because I was the first person to attempt to do a build that needed > it. :-) Anyhow, I am not at all sure that I am competent to be the > maintainer. I need some

Fedora Rawhide-20180629.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 6/138 (x86_64), 23/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180627.n.0): ID: 253611 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/253611 ID: 253625 Test: x86_64 A

Re: In the OpenShift Origin/CRI-O/Kubernetes effort we have a dilemma.

On vendredi 29 juin 2018 18:19:23 CEST Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > FWIW, a fun read from the debian pkg-go list about packaging docker > https://www.mail-archive.com/pkg-go-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net/msg0 > 0032.html I wish we had a formal Go Packaging Team like them. It would be more effi

Re: In the OpenShift Origin/CRI-O/Kubernetes effort we have a dilemma.

FWIW, a fun read from the debian pkg-go list about packaging docker https://www.mail-archive.com/pkg-go-maintainers@alioth-lists.debian.net/msg00032.html On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 12:09:06PM -0400, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:43:11AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Fri, Jun

Re: In the OpenShift Origin/CRI-O/Kubernetes effort we have a dilemma.

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:43:11AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:41 AM Lokesh Mandvekar > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 04:03:28PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > Le 2018-06-29 14:31, Daniel Walsh a écrit : > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > Users of OpenSHift Origi

Re: Hiding the grub menu by default on single OS installs

Le 2018-05-31 14:25, Hans de Goede a écrit : Originally I was planning on doing the failed-boot detect only for F30, but I agree it makes sense to have it for F29 and this will also give us some field testing of this while we still have a fallback in the form of the 1 sec wait for ESC / F8. Do

Re: gdbm reabase question

On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 8:27 AM Tom Hughes wrote: > I guess because 2.49-22.20170224hg.fc26 is the version currently > in rawhide, which is indeed older than the version in F28 which > suggests that it wasn't built in rawhide first as is supposed > to happen. > > As you say it looks like the new v

Re: In the OpenShift Origin/CRI-O/Kubernetes effort we have a dilemma.

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:41 AM Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 04:03:28PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le 2018-06-29 14:31, Daniel Walsh a écrit : > > > > Hi, > > > > > Users of OpenSHift Origin require CRI-O 1.10 right now. But > > > Kubernetes users want to try out th

Re: In the OpenShift Origin/CRI-O/Kubernetes effort we have a dilemma.

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 04:03:28PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le 2018-06-29 14:31, Daniel Walsh a écrit : > > Hi, > > > Users of OpenSHift Origin require CRI-O 1.10 right now.  But > > Kubernetes users want to try out the latest packages for kubernetes > > 1.11 which would require CRI-O 1.11

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180629.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180627.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180629.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 10 Dropped packages:5 Upgraded packages: 143 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 12.28 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Valid use case for modularity or not?

Le 2018-05-26 15:34, Fabio Valentini a écrit : Hi all, I think I finally found a scenario where building some of my (and others') packages as modules would be beneficial. The situation is: - The syncthing package has a lot of golang dependencies. - Some of them are too old in fedora, even in

Re: new package built, now what?

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 03:23:35PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Maybe run the following? Not sure. Hard to find docs on this. > > > fedpkg request-branch f28 > > Documented here: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/fedrepo-req-to-fedpkg > No it isn't. A Change page is not document

Re: Heads up: Python 3.7 rebuild in progress

Thank you Jerry! 'antimony' is built now. On 28/06/2018 22:51, Jerry James wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:06 PM Antonio Trande wrote: >> Does anyone know how to fix 'antimony'? >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594496 > > The code has 2 problems. One is simply a missing "const

Re: In the OpenShift Origin/CRI-O/Kubernetes effort we have a dilemma.

On 06/29/2018 10:03 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le 2018-06-29 14:31, Daniel Walsh a écrit : Hi, Users of OpenSHift Origin require CRI-O 1.10 right now.  But Kubernetes users want to try out the latest packages for kubernetes 1.11 which would require CRI-O 1.11.  Origin might not be ready to mov

Re: In the OpenShift Origin/CRI-O/Kubernetes effort we have a dilemma.

Le 2018-06-29 14:31, Daniel Walsh a écrit : Hi, Users of OpenSHift Origin require CRI-O 1.10 right now.  But Kubernetes users want to try out the latest packages for kubernetes 1.11 which would require CRI-O 1.11.  Origin might not be ready to move to Kubernetes 1.11 for a while. Bottom line w

Re: F29 Self Contained Change: Deprecate YUM 3

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 10:37 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 05:49:39PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 02:37:07PM -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > > If we're keeping both commands, I don't really care - but to make > > > sure I'm understanding this, we'

Re: In the OpenShift Origin/CRI-O/Kubernetes effort we have a dilemma.

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 8:42 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 8:32 AM Daniel Walsh wrote: > >> Users of OpenSHift Origin require CRI-O 1.10 right now. But Kubernetes >> users want to try out the latest packages for kubernetes 1.11 which >> would require CRI-O 1.11. Origin

Re: In the OpenShift Origin/CRI-O/Kubernetes effort we have a dilemma.

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 8:32 AM Daniel Walsh wrote: > Users of OpenSHift Origin require CRI-O 1.10 right now. But Kubernetes > users want to try out the latest packages for kubernetes 1.11 which > would require CRI-O 1.11. Origin might not be ready to move to > Kubernetes 1.11 for a while. > >

In the OpenShift Origin/CRI-O/Kubernetes effort we have a dilemma.

Users of OpenSHift Origin require CRI-O 1.10 right now.  But Kubernetes users want to try out the latest packages for kubernetes 1.11 which would require CRI-O 1.11.  Origin might not be ready to move to Kubernetes 1.11 for a while. Bottom line we want to be able to ship CRI-0 1.10.* and CRI-O

Re: Packages with scriptlets which call ldconfig

> anthy, fontconfig, fonts-tweak-tool, fribidi, im-chooser, imsettings, kakasi, > libeasyfc, libgcroots, libgxim done for the above packages. thanks On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 10:32 AM Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > In Fedora 28 and newer, it is no longer necessary for most packages > which instal

Re: Packages with scriptlets which call ldconfig

On 28.6.2018 03:30, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: In Fedora 28 and newer, it is no longer necessary for most packages which install shared libraries to have scriptlets which call ldconfig: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Scriptlets#Shared_Libraries churchyard amftools gtkglextmm libarcus

Re: When will mock make it into copr?

Awesome info, thank you Miro :] Radka -- *Radka Janeková* .NET Engineer, Red Hat *radka.ja...@redhat.com * IRC: radka | Freenode: Rhea On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 10:04 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 28.6.2018 v 18:18 Radka Janekova napsal(a): > > Hi, we've got some

Re: Semi-orphaning pysvn

On 28.6.2018 22:13, Stephen Gallagher wrote: CCing the maintainers of pyCXX. On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 4:10 PM Jerry James > wrote: On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 1:25 PM Stephen Gallagher mailto:sgall...@redhat.com>> wrote: > I've been keeping the lights on in

Re: Your package doesn't build with Python 3.7

- Original Message - > From: "Sérgio Basto" > To: "Fedora devel" > Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 1:55:52 AM > Subject: Re: Your package doesn't build with Python 3.7 > > On Thu, 2018-06-28 at 20:41 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > sergiomb opencv > > /builddir/build/BUILD/opencv-3.4.1/m

Re: looking for new owner for 'bibutils'

I can take it. My FAS account: vascom пт, 29 июн. 2018 г. в 11:49, Jens-Ulrik Petersen : > Hi, > > Does any Packager want to take over or comaintain the bibutils package? > > I am not really interested in maintaining it any longer since I no longer > have a package that needs it. > > Let me know

looking for new owner for 'bibutils'

Hi, Does any Packager want to take over or comaintain the bibutils package? I am not really interested in maintaining it any longer since I no longer have a package that needs it. Let me know if you want to help. Thanks, Jens ___ devel mailing list --

Re: When will mock make it into copr?

Dne 28.6.2018 v 18:18 Radka Janekova napsal(a): > Hi, we've got some issues that were resolved[1] and I was wondering if anyone > could give me a bit better idea when would > it make into copr? It's now fixed in Mock git/master. First, it must be in proper mock release. I made last release 2 wee