On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 6:16 AM Pawel Veselov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> There are a couple of things that's been annoying me in KDE for a
> while, and I'd like to poke around and understand how I can help
> making them any better.
>
> 1. Which is not as bad, but still, is the screen power. It seems to
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 6:48 PM Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> xemacs-packages-extra jjames stevetraylen
This package installs its info files into a nonstandard place. This
is done on purpose. These info files are to be read by XEmacs'
built-in info browser, not by the info command-line tool.
Co
On 06/16/2018 01:17 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
>> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Till Maas wrote:
So the assumption is to have a super sophisticated browser exploit for
which
an attacker mos
On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Till Maas wrote:
>> > So the assumption is to have a super sophisticated browser exploit for
>> > which
>> > an attacker most likely spent several days to find it and then the P
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 7/138 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180615.n.0):
ID: 249775 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/249775
ID: 249783 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> > So the assumption is to have a super sophisticated browser exploit for which
> > an attacker most likely spent several days to find it and then the PATH
> > setting will make it so much harder that the exploit will n
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180615.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180616.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 72
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 13.32 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> So the assumption is to have a super sophisticated browser exploit for which
> an attacker most likely spent several days to find it and then the PATH
> setting will make it so much harder that the exploit will not succeed? There
> are a lot mo
Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 23:21, Björn Persson wrote:
> [..]
> > Don't forget that if your proof of concept can be modified to either
> > overwrite or append to ~/.bashrc, then it's irrelevant to this debate.
>
> before ~/.bashrc is executed many other scripts executions
>
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 at 23:21, Björn Persson wrote:
[..]
> Don't forget that if your proof of concept can be modified to either
> overwrite or append to ~/.bashrc, then it's irrelevant to this debate.
Is it really so hard to execute "strace -trace=openat,stat bash -l" to
spot that before ~/.bashrc
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 2:46 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III
wrote:
> As of Fedora 28, the 'info' package has gained a file trigger
> (%transfiletrigger) which will automatically rebuild the info directory
> node when any file is installed into %_infodir. Thus it is no longer
> necessary for packa
11 matches
Mail list logo
