# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2018-05-21
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
We haven't met for a few weeks, so let's check in on how things are
going with Fedora 29, Test Days a
> "ES" == Eric Smith writes:
ES> What macro(s) should I use in an RPM spec to refer to a directory
ES> like /usr/lib/modules-load.d, which is under /usr/lib even if libdir
ES> is /usr/lib64? Is there something better than
ES> %{_usr}/lib/modules-load.d?
It seems that there isn't. I would j
What macro(s) should I use in an RPM spec to refer to a directory like
/usr/lib/modules-load.d, which is under /usr/lib even if libdir is
/usr/lib64? Is there something better than %{_usr}/lib/modules-load.d?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorap
On Fri, 2018-05-18 at 15:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-05-11 at 17:53 +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > The libidn upstream has released 1.35, which increments the soname.
> > I'm planning to update the package on the next Tuesday.
> >
> > The following packages will need to be
On Fri, 2018-05-11 at 17:53 +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> The libidn upstream has released 1.35, which increments the soname.
> I'm planning to update the package on the next Tuesday.
>
> The following packages will need to be rebuilt. I don't see anything
> critical that should break the build
I will take care of this.
*William Moreno Reyes*
Colaborador Proyecto Fedora | Nicaragua
IRC: williamjmorenor Canales: #fedora-latam ; #fedora-ni
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Williamjmorenor
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 17 May 2018 at 06:51, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
[..]
> fedpkg has been compatible with Python 3, and defaults to Python 3 in
> rawhide. Thanks Miro Hrončok for your patch to build Python 3 package.
Despite what you just wrote still it is not possible to use it without
python2 packages.
# rpm -q --q
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-05-18/fesco.2018-05-18-15.00.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-05-18/fesco.2018-05-18-15.00.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-05-18/fesco.2018-05-18-15.00.log.html
Hello All!
This package, xmlgraphics-commons, didn't receive much attention
recently, so we missed an opportunity to update it in Fedora 28
without hurry. Unfortunatelyit seems that we have to.
Recently updated pdfbox (which has a subpackage fontbox, a Fop
dependency) makes fop-2.0 unable to produ
Am Montag, den 14.05.2018, 21:56 +0200 schrieb Robert-André Mauchin:
> On jeudi 10 mai 2018 14:28:09 CEST you wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a few Golang and Python packages that need review, any help
> > appreciated. I can do any review in exchange.
> >
> > Rclone dependency:
> >
> > - Revie
This is just a reminder that on 2018-May-22 at 23:59:59 UTC we will close
the Nomination window of May-2018 Elections.
Please check the nomination pages [1][2][3] and apply, if you are
interested to work in FESCo, Council or Mindshare teams.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Development/SteeringC
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:23 AM Björn 'besser82' Esser <
besse...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 09.05.2018, 17:51 + schrieb Fabio Valentini:
> > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 5:45 PM Frantisek Zatloukal > m>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Sure,
> > > I think we can take my spec from copr[0], w
Am Mittwoch, den 09.05.2018, 17:51 + schrieb Fabio Valentini:
> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 5:45 PM Frantisek Zatloukal m>
> wrote:
>
> > Sure,
> > I think we can take my spec from copr[0], which I've worked on with
>
> vondruch. Proper feature tests won't run until we get cucumber >= 3 to
> Fedo
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 8/137 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180516.n.0):
ID: 238718 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/238718
ID: 238743 Test: x86_64
14 matches
Mail list logo
