Re: Fedora Workstation and Third-Party Repositories

Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 04/27/2018 05:39 PM, David Benoit wrote: >> Ah, I did not realize the repositories were disabled in the rpm. Would it >> be appropriate for me to update this >> >> page to mention that under the

Re: orphaning and retiring some packages

On 05/06/2018 07:31 AM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 6:54 PM Mukundan Ragavan > wrote: >> fityk (depends on cmpfit) >> cmpfit (fityk is dependent on this) > Unless someone else wants these two, I will take them. Co-maintainers more > than welcome. > FAS name: alexpl I have

Re: Fedora Workstation and Third-Party Repositories

On 04/27/2018 05:39 PM, David Benoit wrote: > Ah, I did not realize the repositories were disabled in the rpm. Would it > be appropriate for me to update this > > page to mention that under the command line installatio

Fedora Rawhide-20180506.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 28/137 (x86_64), 13/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 234584 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/234584 ID: 234587 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://

Re: DNF producing nonsense results (and a bogus F28 updates compose?)

Coge Micro wrote: > It should be working fine already. I had same issues, but it seems fine > already and "dnf upgrade" passes without warnings. You're just hitting a stale mirror. :) The perl update which vim-enhanced and vim-X11 require is still in testing: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/

Re: DNF producing nonsense results (and a bogus F28 updates compose?)

It should be working fine already. I had same issues, but it seems fine already and "dnf upgrade" passes without warnings. On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 8:45 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sun, 2018-05-06 at 07:33 +0200, Felix M. Cobos wrote: > > On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 09:24:15PM -0700, Andrew Lutomirsk

Re: DNF producing nonsense results (and a bogus F28 updates compose?)

On Sun, 2018-05-06 at 07:33 +0200, Felix M. Cobos wrote: > On Sat, May 05, 2018 at 09:24:15PM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > I just got some very strange behavior from dnf: > > > > $ sudo dnf upgrade --best --allowerasing > > Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:26 ago on Sat 05 May 2018 > >

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180506.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180505.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180506.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 66 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 2.85 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B

[Test-Announce] Fedora 29 Rawhide 20180506.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 29 Rawhide 20180506.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: orphaning and retiring some packages

On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 6:54 PM Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > fityk (depends on cmpfit) > cmpfit (fityk is dependent on this) Unless someone else wants these two, I will take them. Co-maintainers more than welcome. FAS name: alexpl ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Concerning /etc/opt usage

On 05/06/2018 04:29 AM, Rex Dieter wrote: Rex Dieter wrote: Germano Massullo wrote: Today I have received pull request [1]. Since line 62 %dir %{_sysconfdir}/opt/chrome/native-messaging-hosts/ means /etc/opt/chrome/native-messaging-hosts/ and since packaging guidelines [2] say that a package

Re: Adding Obsoletes to generated -debuginfo packages ?

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 6:10 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > In libvirt we recently deleted a driver for the legacy Xen toolstack. > This was shipped in a libvirt-daemon-driver-xen RPM. > I am able to add an "Obsoletes: libvirt-daemon-driver-xen < 4.3.0" > line to the libvirt-daemon-driver-libxl

Re: Concerning /etc/opt usage

Il 05/06/18 04:29, Rex Dieter ha scritto: > Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Germano Massullo wrote: >> >>> Today I have received pull request [1]. >>> Since line 62 >>> %dir %{_sysconfdir}/opt/chrome/native-messaging-hosts/ >>> means >>> /etc/opt/chrome/native-messaging-hosts/ >>> and since packaging guidel

Re: Adding Obsoletes to generated -debuginfo packages ?

> "DPB" == Daniel P Berrangé writes: DPB> How can I get the auto-generated DPB> libvirt-daemon-driver-libxl-debuginfo RPM to have an "Obsoletes: DPB> libvirt-daemon-driver-xen-debuginfo < 4.3.0" statement ? It seems DPB> impossible, meaning users with debuginfo have a broken upgrade DPB> path