On Thu, 2018-05-03 at 13:12 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 12:05:55PM +, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 8:03 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> > wrote:
> >
> > > GCC just updated in Fedora rawhide from 8.0.1 to 8.1.1 and is unable to
> > > create executables du
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 84/137 (x86_64), 23/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 233247 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/233247
ID: 233248 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedorapro
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180502.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180503.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 5
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 167
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 426.91 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Thu, 3 May 2018, Tomas Orsava wrote:
> pip actually checks if ~/.local/bin is on the PATH and prints a warning if it
> isn't. But nobody predicted that ~/.local/bin might be on the PATH but only
> behind /usr/bin. That breaks the intuitive expectation that things installed
> closer to the user
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 29 Rawhide 20180503.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On 4/29/18 11:45 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Assuming that the plan is to leave it enabled in F-29 on branching and
>> have it ship enabled in F-29 I agree, if the intention is to leave it
>> enabled in rawhide and disable it on branching then the Change
>> Proposal mechanism isn't the way to ensure
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 12:05:55PM +, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 8:03 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
> wrote:
>
> > GCC just updated in Fedora rawhide from 8.0.1 to 8.1.1 and is unable to
> > create executables due to annobin:
>
>
> > configure:6112: gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=fo
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 8:03 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> GCC just updated in Fedora rawhide from 8.0.1 to 8.1.1 and is unable to
> create executables due to annobin:
> configure:6112: gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -fexceptions
GCC just updated in Fedora rawhide from 8.0.1 to 8.1.1 and is unable to
create executables due to annobin:
configure:6112: gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -fexceptions
-fstack-protector-strong -grecord-gcc-switches
-specs=/usr/li
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 08:34:48AM +, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>Hi everybody,
>
>Is anybody else experiencing problems with the fedora infrastructure right
>now?
>
>- I was barely able to build a package with koji due to src.fp.org errors
>- fedmsg messages seem to be delaye
On 3.5.2018 12:17, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Last time I've asked it was impossible. See
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4PMKPOOWEZR7EWJCQ6XHLPQ6IKIHQPJ7/
Sorry, the link should have been:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packag.
On 3.5.2018 12:10, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote> How can I get the
auto-generated libvirt-daemon-driver-libxl-debuginfo
RPM to have an "Obsoletes: libvirt-daemon-driver-xen-debuginfo < 4.3.0"
statement ? It seems impossible, meaning users with debuginfo have a
broken upgrade path. An unfortunate cons
In libvirt we recently deleted a driver for the legacy Xen toolstack.
This was shipped in a libvirt-daemon-driver-xen RPM.
I am able to add an "Obsoletes: libvirt-daemon-driver-xen < 4.3.0"
line to the libvirt-daemon-driver-libxl RPM, which gives clean
upgrade path for users.
If they have the l
On Thursday, May 3, 2018 12:10:25 AM CEST Iain Rae wrote:
> no, I'm afraid you're misunderstanding. if someone steals a laptop the
> live user session can be more valuable than the root password. with
> the live session you have access to everything the owner of the sesion
> is logged into. with
- Original Message -
> From: "Lennart Poettering"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Miro Hrončok"
> Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 4:28:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH
>
> So this came up again recently here:
>
> https:
On 03/05/18 09:39, Tomas Orsava wrote:
I just wanted to say that many users would not need sudo access at
all if they
were able to install software to their home directory in a way that
it works
out of the box.
oh yes, that would be the ideal situation, and if ~/.login/bin is so
stand
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 11:35:10AM +0200, Tomas Orsava wrote:
> On 05/02/2018 05:14 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:10:05AM -0400, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > From: "Daniel P. Berrangé"
> > > > To: "Development discussion
On 05/02/2018 05:14 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:10:05AM -0400, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé"
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
Cc: "Kamil Dudka"
Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 4:49:18 PM
Subject: Re
Hi,
here is the output:
# cat /sys/class/dmi/id/bios_version /sys/class/dmi/id/bios_date
JBET68WW (1.32 )
02/27/2018
I apply BIOS updates quite regularly.
Regards,
--
Lorenzo Dalrio
Il giorno mer 2 mag 2018 alle ore 17:39 Hans de Goede
ha scritto:
> Hi,
> On 05/01/2018 10:40 AM, Lorenzo Dal
On 05/02/2018 11:57 PM, Iain Rae wrote:
On 02/05/18 17:50, Kamil Dudka wrote:
On Wednesday, May 2, 2018 4:25:58 PM CEST Iain Rae wrote:
if they've got sudo privs to install software in the system area as root
then any malicious program is going to emulate su/sudo in which case
you're rooted
Hi everybody,
Is anybody else experiencing problems with the fedora infrastructure right
now?
- I was barely able to build a package with koji due to src.fp.org errors
- fedmsg messages seem to be delayed up to 20 minutes
- I can't comment on issues on pagure.io right now
- fedpkg request-repo is
Fedora 26 support is going to be EOL on Tuesday, May 29th, 2018. At
this day we are going to close all the Fedora 26 bugs which will
remain open [1].
You have last few weeks to submit your updates to the Fedora 26, if
you have any, before the Fedora 26 release becomes unsupported.
[1]
https://fe
Hi,
as part of the preparation for community elections in May 2018, I
would like to ask people to populate Election Questionnaire [1] with
questions people might have for nominees. The Questionnaire already
contains questions from the last elections, however you might add your
own, if you have any
23 matches
Mail list logo
