Hi,
Would someone be willing to review a simple package for me? The BZ is here:
Bug 1573695 – Review Request: Battray - simple tray icon to show a laptop’s
battery status.
I have some experience with Fedora's packaging and have maintained a few
packages (pdf-stapler, python-PDF2, sylfilter) f
01.05.2018, 19:05, "Jonathan Wakely" :
> On 26/04/18 19:49 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm upgrading libicu to 61.1 for rawhide, which as usual comes with
>> a soname bump. I requested a side target f29-icu for the builds, I'll
>> ask Pete Walter (who already did it for 60.1) to help wit
I take it, as is part of debian tools , I tried to see if some trick
here, rawhide version still in 1.6.5 when 1.6.10 is available since
2014-05-05 ...
On Mon, 2018-04-30 at 10:37 -0700, Zach Carter wrote:
> I'm orphaning the schroot package, since I no longer use it or work
> with it:
>
>
On Tue, 2018-05-01 at 21:19 +, mark preston wrote:
> i remember OC being very protective of their stream and not working
> well with others to get it in other distributions. I was an oC user
> that switch to nC and still running V10. I've been waiting for an
> update to nC and would like to s
i remember OC being very protective of their stream and not working well with
others to get it in other distributions. I was an oC user that switch to nC
and still running V10. I've been waiting for an update to nC and would like to
stay with it even if i have to upgrade though 11 and 12 to ge
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/137 (x86_64), 4/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 231763 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/231763
ID: 231799 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://open
On 26/04/18 23:44 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 19/04/18 19:02 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I forgot to mention that this will break any packages using
Boost.Python which currently just have BR: boost-devel but that's
arguably a good thing anyway. It will be easy to fix them, and we will
hav
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 08:32:36PM +0200, inderau...@arcor.de wrote:
> btw. just read that fedora workstation doesn't need a separate root
> account anymore. there are no security concerns i should have, don't
> i?
You can set a root password if you like. You might find this bit I
wrote a while ag
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 08:30:19PM +0200, inderau...@arcor.de wrote:
> now ist 1st of may. And Fedora 28 is released. I want do upgrade. But i don't
> want this error messages and related start up issues anymore.
> Is there any progress on fixing this long term issue?
We're working on it, and try
On 26/04/18 19:49 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi,
I'm upgrading libicu to 61.1 for rawhide, which as usual comes with
a soname bump. I requested a side target f29-icu for the builds, I'll
ask Pete Walter (who already did it for 60.1) to help with rebuilding
the dependent packages, or another prove
OLD: Fedora-28-20180425.n.0
NEW: Fedora-28-20180426.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 08:42:53AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-05-01 at 16:25 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Unfortunately the Anaconda install (using virt-install --location
> > method) didn't work well for me on any !x86 architecture. I get the
> > exact same error on ppc6
On 05/01/2018 10:00 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
It's almost Mother's Day, and that means it's time for Fedora 28,
which is officially released today.
FWIW, there is a broken link to the install documentation.
If you visit:
https://getfedora.org/en/workstation/download/
and click on "Installati
On Tue, 2018-05-01 at 16:25 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Unfortunately the Anaconda install (using virt-install --location
> method) didn't work well for me on any !x86 architecture. I get the
> exact same error on ppc64{,le}, aarch64 and armv7l:
>
>
> ** (process:1963): WARNING **: 15:09:
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 04:25:11PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Unfortunately the Anaconda install (using virt-install --location
> method) didn't work well for me on any !x86 architecture. I get the
> exact same error on ppc64{,le}, aarch64 and armv7l:
>
>
> ** (process:1963): WARNING
Unfortunately the Anaconda install (using virt-install --location
method) didn't work well for me on any !x86 architecture. I get the
exact same error on ppc64{,le}, aarch64 and armv7l:
** (process:1963): WARNING **: 15:09:38.580: Cannot load the LVM plugin
anaconda 28.22.10-1.fc28 for Fedora 2
Meeting started by langdon at 14:01:52 UTC.
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-3/2018-05-01/modularity_wg.2018-05-01-14.01.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-3/2018-05-01/modularity_wg.2018-05-01-14.01.txt
Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject
A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update:
Version: 28.20180425.0
Commit(x86_64): 94a9d06eef34aa6774c056356d3d2e024e57a0013b6f8048dbae392a84a137ca
Commit(aarch64):
12a95314084eaa2242bdfe24197774aac163433d2405bc2813b4d89180434630
Commit(ppc64le):
d29c4549226ca8a50846360cf
It's almost Mother's Day, and that means it's time for Fedora 28,
which is officially released today.
Congratulations to everyone who contributed to this amazingly
smooth and polished release. You all are awesome.
Read the official announcement at:
* https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-fedora-
On 4/30/18 1:16 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 2:14 PM Jason L Tibbitts III
> wrote:
>
>>> "CW" == Colin Walters writes:
>
>> CW> I'd say it makes sense to revisit the default here globally in
>> CW> Anaconda.
>
>> Maybe. Have the issues which made XFS less suitable for u
Hi,
i run fedora 28 on a t450 since it was promoted to beta working with it
8-10 hours per day without any issue.
System Information
Manufacturer: LENOVO
Product Name: 20BUS003IX
Version: ThinkPad T450
# cat /sys/class/scsi_host/host*/link_power_management_policy
med_po
21 matches
Mail list logo
