You should likely ask that on the epel-devel list, but I've added
smooge in as he's the EPEL lead.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 6:22 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> Anyone knows when RHEL 7.5 packages will be available for aarch64 in
> koji, so that new dependencies get picked up? I'm trying to build EPE
Anyone knows when RHEL 7.5 packages will be available for aarch64 in
koji, so that new dependencies get picked up? I'm trying to build EPEL7
xorgxrdp against the latest xorg-x11-server and all other arches have
1.19.5, but aarch64 is stuck on 1.19.3.
PS. Buildroot overrides don't work here, AFAICT
On 11 April 2018 at 03:34, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A new version rpkg-1.53 is released.
>
> This is the first version delivering Python 3 package, which is
> python3-rpkg. Thanks Miro Hrončok for making the patch.
[..]
It would be good to port fedpkg to python 3.
Someone is working on
Thanks Chris for the follow up.
I also wanted to go for OTC fonts, but both Akira Tagoh and Owen Taylor who
are fonts rendering experts advised against switching this late in the
cycle to the .ttc fonts in case there are any serious regressions for any
apps (we are not aware of any yet but there c
On Fri, 2018-04-13 at 00:17 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> No missing expected images.
>
> Failed openQA tests: 4/137 (x86_64), 4/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
>
> ID: 221584Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/221584
> ID
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 43/137 (x86_64), 6/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180411.n.3):
ID: 221340 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/221340
ID: 221348 Te
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/137 (x86_64), 4/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 221584 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/221584
ID: 221587 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controlle
On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 15:43:28 -0500
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > writes:
>
> > Brotli apparently just got a new update, and I was told I have to
> > coordinate package updates with you guys in Rawhide instead of just
> > uploading the updates unannounced. How should I proceed?
> ]
>
Dennis Gilmore wrote,
> We have now completed the automated part of the Fedora 28 mass rebuild,
> The details for the scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 28 can be found
> here[1]. The failure page for the rebuilds can be found here[3] and the
> full list of packages that are needing rebuilding can
Hi,
The LastPass CLI package is badly outdated, with 2 major bugs.
It seems the EPEL package was abandoned ~2016
I have emailed the maintainer (Tom Prince) directly just to confirm, and
have not hard back.
I've also opened a bug here with the details:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=
> writes:
> Brotli apparently just got a new update, and I was told I have to
> coordinate package updates with you guys in Rawhide instead of just
> uploading the updates unannounced. How should I proceed?
Well, there's only really a need to coordinate if the versioning of the
library chan
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 08:27 -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
>> Shouldn't the priority be to make Fedora welcoming to all, and not to
>> limiting the audience based on an artificial size limitation?
>
> This is actually a tricky equation, b
Brotli apparently just got a new update, and I was told I have to
coordinate package updates with you guys in Rawhide instead of just
uploading the updates unannounced. How should I proceed?
--
GPG Keys: https://keybase.io/pouar
Tox ID:
2EA7A6D5494C10B2E0F32004A1E9CBD971777E551A902059E5EA7E73E5A2
OLD: Fedora-28-20180411.n.0
NEW: Fedora-28-20180412.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 29
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 19.30 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On 12.4.2018 20:32, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I am hear-by volunteer to support python27 in EPEL8 and EPEL6. It will
be based off of the EL7 code.
Thank you. For EPEL6, consult the guidelines on how to add such package.
For the other EPEL you have mentioned, I unfortunately cannot say
anyth
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 12 April 2018 at 11:48, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> On 11.4.2018 21:31, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>>
>>> Miro Hrončok wrote:
This is important for those who like to maintain a single spec for
everything. Previously, there have
On 12 April 2018 at 11:48, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 11.4.2018 21:31, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>
>> Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>>
>>> This is important for those who like to maintain a single spec for
>>> everything. Previously, there have been messages on the devel list that
>>> encouraged people to change
On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 08:27 -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 13:36:33 +0200, you wrote:
>
> > Tomasz Torcz ?? wrote:
> > > While we at it, let's drop all latin fonts, too. Cyrillic should be
> > > enable to cover most of the world's usage and is quite similar to basic
> > > l
On mercredi 11 avril 2018 19:27:55 CEST rugk wrote:
> Hi,
> I saw Joplin[1], which recently got NextCloud integration[2], is not
> packaged in Fedora. Maybe one could do so?
> Best regards,
> rugk
>
> [1] https://joplin.cozic.net/
> [2]
> https://nextcloud.com/blog/mobile-note-taking-with-your-
On 11.4.2018 21:26, Raphael Groner wrote:
Hi Miro,
what to do with packages that can not be ported to python3?
If you are asking about next major RHEL release, I'm afraid I cannot tell.
If you are asking about Fedora then there are two options:
* somebody maintains python2
* we drop such p
On 11.4.2018 21:31, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Miro Hrončok wrote:
This is important for those who like to maintain a single spec for
everything. Previously, there have been messages on the devel list that
encouraged people to change the python3 conditional from "if fedora" to
"if fedora or rhel > 7" [
Good Morning Everyone,
The Fedora Infrastructure has been running a jenkins instance in its
cloud for their own needs. That instance gained some tractions in our
community to the point that some projects are relying on it.
Unfortunately, our best-effort isn't sufficient to keep this instance in
a
On 04/12/2018 07:40 AM, John Reiser wrote:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm getting:
/builddir/build/BUILD/gdl-0.9.8/src/basic_pro_jmg.cpp: In function 'void
lib::linkimage(EnvT*)':
/builddir/build/BUILD/gdl-0.9.8/src/basic_pro_jmg.cpp:159:36: warning:
dereferencing type-punned p
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 50/137 (x86_64), 6/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180407.n.1):
ID: 220889 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/220889
ID: 220890 Test: x8
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm getting:
/builddir/build/BUILD/gdl-0.9.8/src/basic_pro_jmg.cpp: In function 'void
lib::linkimage(EnvT*)':
/builddir/build/BUILD/gdl-0.9.8/src/basic_pro_jmg.cpp:159:36: warning:
dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
[-Ws
Vít Ondruch píše v Čt 12. 04. 2018 v 11:50 +0200:
>
> Dne 12.4.2018 v 10:26 Fedora Rawhide Report napsal(a):
> > Added packages: 421
>
> ... snip ...
>
> > = ADDED PACKAGES =
> > Package: ReviewBoard-3.0.6-1.module_1655+c1bb0ce4
> > Summary: Web-based code review tool
> > RPMs:R
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I'm getting:
>
> /builddir/build/BUILD/gdl-0.9.8/src/basic_pro_jmg.cpp: In function 'void
> lib::linkimage(EnvT*)':
> /builddir/build/BUILD/gdl-0.9.8/src/basic_pro_jmg.cpp:159:36: warning:
> dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
> [-Wstrict-ali
Dne 12.4.2018 v 10:26 Fedora Rawhide Report napsal(a):
> Added packages: 421
... snip ...
> = ADDED PACKAGES =
> Package: ReviewBoard-3.0.6-1.module_1655+c1bb0ce4
> Summary: Web-based code review tool
> RPMs:ReviewBoard
> Size:12.19 MiB
>
> Package: ant-1.10.3-1.module_1618
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
29 matches
Mail list logo
