Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-04-13 15:00 UTC'
NOTE: we discussed moving the
Hi Pierre,
Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 01:28:02PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
>> On Monday, 09 April 2018 at 13:20, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>> [...]
>>> Finally the reason this has not been correctly announced is that we are
>>> still
>>> investigatin
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2018-04-12 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2018-04-12 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2018-04-12 1
I'm getting:
/builddir/build/BUILD/gdl-0.9.8/src/basic_pro_jmg.cpp: In function 'void
lib::linkimage(EnvT*)':
/builddir/build/BUILD/gdl-0.9.8/src/basic_pro_jmg.cpp:159:36: warning:
dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
[-Wstrict-aliasing]
(BaseGDL* &) dynFu
Since 2.4.0 is out, soname change will be to libqalculate.so.16. I will submit
pull requests for the affected packages. I might miss F28.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproj
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 11 April 2018 at 10:02, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:43 AM, Alexander Bokovoy
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not in Ansible engineering or product management so take this with a
>>> grain of salt. My understanding
On 03/28/2018 12:56 PM, John Reiser wrote:
>> I've just discovered that gdl appears to be segfaulting a lot now deep in
>> the antlr c++ generated parser code with the switch to gcc 8.
>
> A bugzilla report would be nice. Run under gdb, report register contents
> and the instruction stream surrou
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 220589 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/220589
ID: 220592 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedorap
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
> "RG" == Raphael Groner writes:
RG> what to do with packages that can not be ported to python3?
Can anything really not be ported to python3? I suppose if there was
something which messed with the internals of the python interpreter in
some way then that would potentially never be portable
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> This is important for those who like to maintain a single spec for
> everything. Previously, there have been messages on the devel list that
> encouraged people to change the python3 conditional from "if fedora" to
> "if fedora or rhel > 7" [5]. Please make a note that it will
Hi Miro,
what to do with packages that can not be ported to python3?
For instance ecryptfs-utils … an orphan process will also orphan some
dependencies like ecryptfs-simple etc.
And therefore sirikali is going to loose some of its features that are
available by help from ecryptfs tools.
RFE ec
OLD: Fedora-28-20180410.n.1
NEW: Fedora-28-20180411.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 93
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 11.45 MiB
Size of dropped packages:9.25 MiB
Size
Hi,
I saw Joplin[1], which recently got NextCloud integration[2], is not packaged
in Fedora. Maybe one could do so?
Best regards,
rugk
[1] https://joplin.cozic.net/
[2]
https://nextcloud.com/blog/mobile-note-taking-with-your-private-cloud-announcing-joplinnextcloud-integration/
On 11 April 2018 at 10:02, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:43 AM, Alexander Bokovoy
> wrote:
>
>> I'm not in Ansible engineering or product management so take this with a
>> grain of salt. My understanding is that cadence of Ansible releases and
>> its aggressiveness in API
On 11 April 2018 at 15:02, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:43 AM, Alexander Bokovoy
> wrote:
>
>> I'm not in Ansible engineering or product management so take this with a
>> grain of salt. My understanding is that cadence of Ansible releases and
>> its aggressiveness in API
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:43 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> I'm not in Ansible engineering or product management so take this with a
> grain of salt. My understanding is that cadence of Ansible releases and
> its aggressiveness in API changes makes it a bit less suitable to follow
> a traditional
On 04/10/2018 11:05 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> At this point, no offense to Nirik and the maintenance he does on the
> package, I'm actually tempted to just grab it from upstream directly at
> https://releases.ansible.com/ansible/rpm/
Feel free. Do whatever you feel is best for you.
>
> At leas
This is a late proposal for F28 release, mostly to spread awareness of the
availability of java-openjdk 10 in Fedora. It is not closely tied to the
F28 release however it would be good to have this in the formal F28 scope.
That is the reason, why after a discussion with the Change owner, this is
an
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 10:05 Peter Robinson, wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:58 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> > James Hogarth wrote:
> >> I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible
> >> from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in their extras repo, and EPEL
> >> policy is
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 01:28:02PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Monday, 09 April 2018 at 13:20, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> [...]
> > Finally the reason this has not been correctly announced is that we are
> > still
> > investigating the capacity of the system and the pipeline
Dne 11.4.2018 v 04:34 Chenxiong Qi napsal(a):
> This is the first version delivering Python 3 package, which is
> python3-rpkg. Thanks Miro Hrončok for making the patch.
Is it possible to rename the source package to python-rpkg? (I will happily do
the package review).
Because we have source pac
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 12:58 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> James Hogarth wrote:
>> I was under the impression that as of 2.4.0 in EL7 we removed ansible
>> from EPEL7 since Red Hat included it in their extras repo, and EPEL
>> policy is not to conflict.
>>
>> I was surprised just now to see ansible
On Wednesday, 11 April 2018 at 10:35, Michal Schorm wrote:
> For fetaures, that are optional, weak dependencies is the best solution I
> can think of.
> Even when "Recommends" is used, which means it will try to pull the
> dependency as well, if not said specifically opted-out.
That's fine. The op
On ti, 10 huhti 2018, Todd Zullinger wrote:
James Hogarth wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, 00:59 Todd Zullinger, wrote:
Red Hat announced today that Ansible was being deprecated
from the extras channel. Their advice is that those who
have "previously installed Ansible and its dependencies from
the
For fetaures, that are optional, weak dependencies is the best solution I
can think of.
Even when "Recommends" is used, which means it will try to pull the
dependency as well, if not said specifically opted-out.
> 2 considerations:
> * is the user experience significantly affected?
> * is the size
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
27 matches
Mail list logo
