On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 3:13 AM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 6 April 2018 at 22:58, Pierre-Francois RENARD wrote:
>> Hello guys,
>>
>> with F28 I tried to use autofs and nfs.
>
> BTW autofs: is it any particular reason why in Fedora kernels autofs
> support is compiled into the kernel and is not pr
> "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
ZJ> Please don't. This is a repeat of the original idea of having
ZJ> separate python3 packages back when python3 was being
ZJ> introduced.
It seems that you are suggesting that pointless bureaucracy be kept in
place purely because it slows down
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 04:41:34PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 3:52 PM, wrote:
> >
> > There was also
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Default_Local_DNS_Resolver which was
> > proposed for F22, but deferred twice and eventually dropped.
>
> I followed the multis
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 6:25 PM, Ian Kent wrote:
> On 07/04/18 10:13, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>> $ cat /proc/filesystems | grep ext; echo; lsmod | grep ext
>> ext3
>> ext2
>> ext4
>
> Not sure about those but ext3 and ext4 are probably compiled in
> because they are frequently used, ext2 maybe shoul
On 07/04/18 10:13, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 6 April 2018 at 22:58, Pierre-Francois RENARD wrote:
>> Hello guys,
>>
>> with F28 I tried to use autofs and nfs.
>
> BTW autofs: is it any particular reason why in Fedora kernels autofs
> support is compiled into the kernel and is not provided as loa
# F28 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2018-04-09
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have 6 proposed blockers and 2 proposed freeze exception
issues for Final to review, so let's have a review meeting on Monday.
If you have time today, you can take
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2018-04-09
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
We didn't look at the pending release criteria proposals last week as
several folks were on vacation,
On 07/04/18 05:58, Pierre-Francois RENARD wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> with F28 I tried to use autofs and nfs.
> I had the following error “Too many levels of symbolic links”
> I had to change SELinux mode to permissive to be able to make autofs usable
> ...
I had a report that appeared to be sel
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> On Monday, 09 April 2018 at 00:52, Chris Murphy wrote:
> [...]
>> [chris@f28h ~]$ dnssec-trigger-control status
>> at 2018-04-08 16:46:45
>> cache 75.75.76.76: OK
>> cache 75.75.75.75: OK
>> cache 2001:558:feed::1: OK
>> cache
On Monday, 09 April 2018 at 00:52, Chris Murphy wrote:
[...]
> [chris@f28h ~]$ dnssec-trigger-control status
> at 2018-04-08 16:46:45
> cache 75.75.76.76: OK
> cache 75.75.75.75: OK
> cache 2001:558:feed::1: OK
> cache 2001:558:feed::2: OK
> state: cache secure
This looks good, similar to mine.
>
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> On Monday, 09 April 2018 at 00:33, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> > On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 4:07 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Sunday, 08 April 2018 at
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 3:52 PM, wrote:
>
> There was also
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Default_Local_DNS_Resolver which was
> proposed for F22, but deferred twice and eventually dropped.
I followed the multistep instructions there, and this also breaks everything.
Apr 08 16:38:21 f2
On Monday, 09 April 2018 at 00:33, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 4:07 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> > wrote:
> >> On Sunday, 08 April 2018 at 23:52, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> >>>
> >>> There was also
> >>> https://f
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 4:07 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
>> On Sunday, 08 April 2018 at 23:52, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
>>>
>>> There was also
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Default_Local_DNS_Resolver which was
>>
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 4:07 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> On Sunday, 08 April 2018 at 23:52, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
>>
>> There was also
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Default_Local_DNS_Resolver which was
>> proposed for F22, but deferred twice and eventually dropped.
On Sunday, 08 April 2018 at 23:52, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
>
> There was also
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Default_Local_DNS_Resolver which was
> proposed for F22, but deferred twice and eventually dropped.
Guys, I've had this enabled since forever with unbound as the local
resolv
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 8:30 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 02:55:49PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
>> My concern is if he can retroactively apply the new license to the
>> older versions of the fonts. Is this a valid concern or is it not how
>> licensing wor
There was also
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Default_Local_DNS_Resolver which
was proposed for F22, but deferred twice and eventually dropped.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...
Hi,
I've been doing some digging around to figure out how to enhance DNS
security privacy, and it's really a rabbit hole. Fedora 28, not any
different near as I can tell from Windows 10 or macOS 10.13 is simply
deferring to DHCP assigned DNS which for my POS ISP is hardwired to
their DNS servers a
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 02:55:49PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hi Zbigniew,
>
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 10:44:41PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> >> - If it is indeed incompatible, would trying to convince hi
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 46/137 (x86_64), 6/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 218668 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/218668
ID: 218697 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://open
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 11:49 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>> And we've circled back to the original post starting this thread.
>>
>> Note: intent to *orphan*, not intent to *retire*.
>
> If it is not going to be retired, then why would we want to kill python2-*
> subpackages through
Rex Dieter wrote:
> And we've circled back to the original post starting this thread.
>
> Note: intent to *orphan*, not intent to *retire*.
If it is not going to be retired, then why would we want to kill python2-*
subpackages throughout the distribution for no reason?
Kevin Kofler
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Somebody needs to pick it up.
> ...
> I see no benefit from removing the python2
> package in such a rush.
And we've circled back to the original post starting this thread.
Note: intent to *orphan*, not intent to *retire*.
-- Rex
__
Peter Oliver wrote:
> In any case, once we start removing Python 2 components, it seems to me
> that the message to users is, "Python 2 can't be relied upon in this
> release". That being the case, if we did go ahead with this staged
> removal, would it be helpful to think of this change the other
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180407.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180408.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 15
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:9.25 MiB
Hi Zbigniew,
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 10:44:41PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
>> - If it is indeed incompatible, would trying to convince him to adopt
>> a dual license scheme be the best course of action?
> You know this
On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 13:46:55 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Please make such a message flood opt-in by default instead of opt-out.
> The communication about such new services and their purpose is extremely
> poor IMO.
There is not even a contact address on the page!
Only a cryptic table. No docu
Please make such a message flood opt-in by default instead of opt-out.
The communication about such new services and their purpose is extremely
poor IMO.
[...]
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2018 23:42:01 + (UTC)
From: notifications fedoraproject org
Subject: fedmsg notification
Please make such a message flood opt-in by default instead of opt-out.
The communication about such new services and their purpose is extremely
poor IMO.
[...]
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2018 23:59:31 + (UTC)
From: notifications fedoraproject org
Subject: greenwave is a GO on
On Sat, 7 Apr 2018, 19:17 Miro Hrončok, wrote:
Strong reasons for the distribution were already discussed above, including:
>
> * we don't have the ability/mapower to remove everything at once
>
Won't it take more total effort to remove things piecemeal rather than all
in one go, though?
*
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 12:08:23PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 12:01 PM, Tomasz Torcz 👁️ wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 10:05:12AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >>
> >> > * Feedback: Easy "home media server" would be nice (sgallagh,
> >> > 20:08:36)
> >>
> >>
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 7:09 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 12:01 PM, Tomasz Torcz 👁️
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 10:05:12AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >>
> >> > * Feedback: Easy "home media server" would be nice (sgallagh,
> >> > 20:08:36)
> >>
> >> TBH I t
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 12:01 PM, Tomasz Torcz 👁️ wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 10:05:12AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> > * Feedback: Easy "home media server" would be nice (sgallagh,
>> > 20:08:36)
>>
>> TBH I think that's quite a divergence from a typical "enterprise
>> server" th
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 10:05:12AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> > * Feedback: Easy "home media server" would be nice (sgallagh,
> > 20:08:36)
>
> TBH I think that's quite a divergence from a typical "enterprise
> server" that the Server SIG has targetted.
But this is probably much c
On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 10:44:41PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I doubt most of you know or care about George Douros' family of fonts,
> as almost all of them are quite niche. However, there is one font in
> particular, Symbola, that a number of users and packagers care for,
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
37 matches
Mail list logo
