Dear list,
I've stumbled upon a serious issue that has not been discussed before.
Somewhere around May 2015 kernel files was moved to
/usr/lib/modules/, which are then copied to /boot in post scriptlets
[1]. The issue is that such files are marked with %ghost because they don't
exist initially
Hello team,
openvdb currently failed for some odd reasons
(https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25408808) on both
Rawhide and F28 in order to rebuild for boost 1.66.
Looking for tail result from build.log, it seems the mockbuild hit a bug:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfi
On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 12:55 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I don't have to do it for many of my packages, but I do regularly
> check ABI compliance before performing an update so I know if I need
> to rebuild dependencies or not.
> Currently my workflow is something like:
> $ cd abicompare/$ mkdir
On 02/28/2018 05:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 12:14 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 02/27/2018 07:27 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson
mailto:adamw...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
Once again, folks, *please* announce your sonam
Missing expected images:
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 17/127 (x86_64), 7/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 196470 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/196470
ID: 196483 Test: x86_64 Workstat
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> Something needs to be done to make the compose process more robust, e.g.:
>> * running createrepo on a stable release, so that we do not have to be
>> able
>> to init a chroot of the target system to compose a repository. A broken
>> dependency, even in systemd or rpm, sho
On Thu, 01 Mar 2018 14:29:45 -
"Farhad Mohammadi Majd" wrote:
> Hello, in Debian (9, stable), size of all the official repositories
> metadata is maximum 10MB, while in Fedora, today I ran "dnf update"
> for first time after installing Fedora 27
> (Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-27-1.6) and i
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 05:46:00PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> I ran some check on latest compose and found that quite a few packages
> in repo can't be installed due to being obsoleted. What do we do about
> those packages? Should I submit b
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 28 Branched 20180301.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 09:19:48 -0600,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Note that there was a completed compose for March 1st, so you don't
need this today.
I'm not sure what happened, but it looks like the compose only got copied
over to the secondary architecure. So i386 has updates from today av
On 03/01/2018 11:01 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> I know Pierre-Yves warned us about the bug that the tests will be
> reported as a failure if the tests are still being run, but there was
> absolutely no indication that there were more tests that were still
> being run. So this could definitely
On 03/01/2018 08:46 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> I ran some check on latest compose and found that quite a few packages
> in repo can't be installed due to being obsoleted. What do we do about
> those packages? Should I submit bugs for each of them?
I would say so yes. Then after some time just reti
ject.org/metalink?repo=rawhide&arch=$basearch
>
> #baseurl=http://bruno.wolff.to/fedora/development/rawhide/$basearch/os/
> #baseurl=file:///home/fedora/development/rawhide/Everything/$basearch/os/
> baseurl=https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-2018030
On 02/28/2018 06:19 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> AFAICT, those "broken deps in rawhide" mails are only sent if there is a
>> compose, and during the past weeks, there have been few of those ... so
>> breakage is sometimes allowed to sit unnoticed (and grow increasingly
>> wor
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 03:04:11PM +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:02:25 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > So what do you advice as course of action here, should we fix darkserver or
> > move
> > its functionality to ABRT?
>
> "move its functionality to ABRT"
>
>
> > Th
Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> It probably comes from your patch FreeSOLID-2.1.1-pkgconfig.patch:
I recommend dropping that patch entirely. IMHO, we should not add pkg-config
files downstream for upstream libraries not using pkg-config. But of course
that may break other packages expecting the do
Dusty Mabe wrote:
> FYI: atomic ostree composes are not release blocking so that is not why a
> compose will fail.
In the past we had composes failing due to something Atomic failing to
compose, I guess that changed since.
Kevin Kofler
___
deve
On 02/25/2018 08:59 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 12:12:33PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 03:50:38PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:28:20PM +0100, Petr Šplíchal wrote:
Hi!
During the last days there have
On jeudi 1 mars 2018 16:37:17 CET Martin Gansser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can't install FreeSOLID-devel on F28
>
> [root@f28 tmp]# dnf install FreeSOLID-devel
> Last metadata expiration check: 1:45:49 ago on Thu Mar 1 14:49:33 2018.
> Error:
> Problem: conflicting requests
> - nothing provides pkgco
On 03/01/2018 04:00 PM, Petr Šplíchal wrote:
To sum up what I've heard so far from the developer side:
* I would like to enable tests for my component (yes, I want)
* I will take care of them (really, I see the benefit in CI)
* I want to easily collaborate on tests with qe (direct commits)
* I d
Martin Gansser wrote:
> can't install FreeSOLID-devel on F28
>
> [root@f28 tmp]# dnf install FreeSOLID-devel
> Last metadata expiration check: 1:45:49 ago on Thu Mar 1 14:49:33 2018.
> Error:
> Problem: conflicting requests
> - nothing provides pkgconfig(qhull) needed by
> FreeSOLID-devel-
Try this:
BuildRequires: python3-devel
# bytecompile with Python 3
%global __python %{__python3}
in your specfile to force it to bytecompile your Python code with Python 3.
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
On 03/01/2018 11:52 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Speaking of that, it seems that the Rawhide compose failed yesterday due
>> to some KDE/QT soname bump:
> [actually a typo in a Requires, as was already pointed out]
>>
>> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Speaking of that, it seems that the Rawhide compose failed yesterday due
> to some KDE/QT soname bump:
[actually a typo in a Requires, as was already pointed out]
>
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20180228.n.0/logs/global/pungi.global.log
>
Simo Sorce wrote:
> It could be accomplished by changing our tooling[*] to use overlay
> filesystems to figure out exactly what a make install did and pick only
> those files.
Why is the overlay filesystem needed? We already install to a DESTDIR. The
whole contents of the DESTDIR should be packag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I ran some check on latest compose and found that quite a few packages
in repo can't be installed due to being obsoleted. What do we do about
those packages? Should I submit bugs for each of them?
can't install zeroinstall-injector-2.3.3-9.fc28.noar
"Martin Gansser" wrote:
> when compiling qarte-4.4.0 with this spec file
> https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Packages/test/qarte.spec
> '[' noarch = noarch ']'
> + case "${QA_CHECK_RPATHS:-}" in
> + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot
> + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress
> + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-static-arc
- Original Message -
> From: "Martin Gansser"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, March 1, 2018 11:35:25 AM
> Subject: qarte - compilation fails
>
> Hi,
>
> when compiling qarte-4.4.0 with this spec file
> https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Packages/test/qarte.spec
>
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:57 AM, David Demelier wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I was searching a very possible minimal dnf group for chroot builds. It
> looks like the 'Core' group already minimal contains lots of packages
> that may be unneeded in containers/chroot scenarios. For example:
>
> - sssd,
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 7:49 PM, Randy Barlow
wrote:
It does not appear to be blocked currently.
There is a bug. Yesterday it was red and said tests failed; the result
changed itself. I see there are many more test results now than there
were yesterday. It looks like the tests had not finish
Hello all,
I was searching a very possible minimal dnf group for chroot builds. It
looks like the 'Core' group already minimal contains lots of packages
that may be unneeded in containers/chroot scenarios. For example:
- sssd,
- cronie,
- selinux packages,
- NetworkManager,
- firewalld
Hi,
can't install FreeSOLID-devel on F28
[root@f28 tmp]# dnf install FreeSOLID-devel
Last metadata expiration check: 1:45:49 ago on Thu Mar 1 14:49:33 2018.
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides pkgconfig(qhull) needed by
FreeSOLID-devel-2.1.1-29.fc28.i686
- nothing prov
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=rawhide&arch=$basearch
#baseurl=http://bruno.wolff.to/fedora/development/rawhide/$basearch/os/
#baseurl=file:///home/fedora/development/rawhide/Everything/$basearch/os/
baseurl=https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20180301.n.0/compose/Everythin
>> To sum up what I've heard so far from the developer side:
>>
>> * I would like to enable tests for my component (yes, I want)
>> * I will take care of them (really, I see the benefit in CI)
>> * I want to easily collaborate on tests with qe (direct commits)
>> * I don't want to give qe commit ac
On Thu, 2018-03-01 at 06:21 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 01:29:38PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > I used to agree with this, but I've come around to thinking that spec
> > > files should be smaller, less complicated, and more automatable. I
> > > think we'd be better havi
Dne 1.3.2018 v 14:47 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> Vít Ondruch wrote on 03/01/2018 06:44 PM:
>>
>>
>> Dne 1.3.2018 v 03:19 Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
>>> Fabio Valentini wrote:
AFAICT, those "broken deps in rawhide" mails are only sent if there
is a
compose, and during the past weeks, th
Hello, in Debian (9, stable), size of all the official repositories metadata is
maximum 10MB,
while in Fedora, today I ran "dnf update" for first time after installing
Fedora 27 (Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-27-1.6) and it took 20+58MB for two
official repositories!
It is really too high, wh
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 02:44:37PM +0100, Petr Šplíchal wrote:
> > > > My worries are basically that this mechanism is hiding the
> > > > tests from the package maintainers. It splits the concerns
> > > > between people maintaining the artifacts and people
> > > > maintaining the tests, which is ex
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 29/129 (x86_64), 8/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 196035 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_update_cli
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/196035
ID: 196038 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://ope
Vít Ondruch wrote on 03/01/2018 06:44 PM:
Dne 1.3.2018 v 03:19 Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
Fabio Valentini wrote:
AFAICT, those "broken deps in rawhide" mails are only sent if there is a
compose, and during the past weeks, there have been few of those ... so
breakage is sometimes allowed to sit u
> > > My worries are basically that this mechanism is hiding the
> > > tests from the package maintainers. It splits the concerns
> > > between people maintaining the artifacts and people
> > > maintaining the tests, which is exactly what the original
> > > plan to bring CI was *not* about.
> >
> >
glibc-2.27.9000-7.fc29 will hopefully fix this. It will take some time
to build, so if anyone wants to untag -6 in the meantime, please do so.
Thanks,
Florian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to deve
On 03/01/2018 12:29 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
Hi,
Just got a koschei report about perl-perl5i failing to build:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/perl-perl5i?collection=f29
It seems the linker can't find /usr/lib64/libpthread_nonshared.a:
+ perl Build.PL --installdirs=vendor '--opti
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550520
Bug ID: 1550520
Summary: Upgrade perl-Crypt-SMIME to 0.25
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Crypt-SMIME
Assignee: steve.tray...@cern.ch
Reporter: jples...@re
Hi,
Just got a koschei report about perl-perl5i failing to build:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/perl-perl5i?collection=f29
It seems the linker can't find /usr/lib64/libpthread_nonshared.a:
+ perl Build.PL --installdirs=vendor '--optimize=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall
-Werror=format-securi
On 27 February 2018 at 18:04, Adam Williamson
wrote:
[..]
> Do you just mean the python2-net-snmp package will go away and anything
> using it has to migrate to python3-net-snmp? If so, have you actually
> looked at the things that use it and considered how difficult it will
> be to migrate them?
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 01:29:38PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > I used to agree with this, but I've come around to thinking that spec
> > files should be smaller, less complicated, and more automatable. I
> > think we'd be better having a post-build test warning that this package
> > has files miss
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 06:38:36PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> The further down the workflow a problem is detected the more time expensive
> / disruptive it is to fix it. So while having post-build tests to validate
> lots of things is great (and I wish we had more of it in Fedora), I see it
On 02/20/2018 05:33 PM, Till Hofmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a question regarding the the RPM dependency generator scripts.
> I'm working on packaging the ROS stack [1,2] and I'm currently dealing
> with the dependency generation. My goal is to wrap all Provides and
> Requires for sonames be
fixed in sox, passwd, and usermode
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
when compiling qarte-4.4.0 with this spec file
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Packages/test/qarte.spec
'[' noarch = noarch ']'
+ case "${QA_CHECK_RPATHS:-}" in
+ /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress
+ /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip
+ /usr/lib/rpm/
Dne 1.3.2018 v 03:19 Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> AFAICT, those "broken deps in rawhide" mails are only sent if there is a
>> compose, and during the past weeks, there have been few of those ... so
>> breakage is sometimes allowed to sit unnoticed (and grow increasingly
>>
Dne 28.2.2018 v 18:56 Bruno Wolff III napsal(a):
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 10:35:11 +0100,
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>> And was the compose successful today or not. Looking at
>>
>> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20180228.n.0/logs/global/pungi.global.log
>>
>>
>
Le mercredi 28 février 2018 à 21:11 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit :
> On 28 February 2018 at 10:03, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > Le 2018-02-28 15:28, Orcan Ogetbil a écrit :
> > >
> > > On 28 February 2018 at 09:19, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> >
> >
> > > These are all _very_ edge use-cases.
> >
> >
54 matches
Mail list logo
