On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 05:24:28AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > But size is easy:
> > $ du -s /var/tmp/inst-O*
> > 74428 /var/tmp/inst-O3
> > 56136 /var/tmp/inst-O3-lto
> > 61992 /var/tmp/inst-Os
> > 43572 /var/tmp/inst-Os-lto
>
> The current default is -O2,
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> But size is easy:
> $ du -s /var/tmp/inst-O*
> 74428 /var/tmp/inst-O3
> 56136 /var/tmp/inst-O3-lto
> 61992 /var/tmp/inst-Os
> 43572 /var/tmp/inst-Os-lto
The current default is -O2, not -O3, though.
Kevin Kofler
_
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 7:46 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> Thank you, Rex. I'll check whether that fixes the polyml problem.
And indeed it did. Thanks again.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 11:31 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Good question, as it's a pure bugfix, yes. Building now.
Thank you, Rex. I'll check whether that fixes the polyml problem.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@l
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 03:35:39PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> > BTW size. Did you try to compile systemd with optimisation for size (-Os)?
> >
> > There are many Linux packages which should be optimised for size
> > because they provide binaries which are speed critical l
2018-02-14 15:59 GMT-05:00 Igor Gnatenko :
>
> Your options:
>
> * Speak up and tell package names I should not touch because … (you should
> complete this sentence).
> * Fix up packages and tell package names I should not touch because you did
> that already.
> * Tell package names you want to rem
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 12:12:33PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 03:50:38PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:28:20PM +0100, Petr Šplíchal wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > During the last days there have been concerns raised regarding
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 04:55:55PM +0100, Thomas Haller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 2018-02-25 at 12:30 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 01:19:24PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > On 02/25/2018 12:45 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > > > What's our c
Hi,
On Sun, 2018-02-25 at 12:30 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 01:19:24PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > On 02/25/2018 12:45 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > > What's our current take on using LTO for Fedora package builds?
> > > systemd would lik
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 5:04 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Some packages use LTO (link-time optimization) with the GNU toolchain.
>
> In the past, this was problematic because the generated debugging
> information was not quite usable. Today, it causes problems with some of
> the hardening quality
Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> BTW size. Did you try to compile systemd with optimisation for size (-Os)?
>
> There are many Linux packages which should be optimised for size
> because they provide binaries which are speed critical like boot
> loaders and boot tools (grub, lilo, gubby) some diagnostics a
On 25 February 2018 at 12:30, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 01:19:24PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> On 02/25/2018 12:45 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> >>What's our current take on using LTO for Fedora package builds?
>>
>> >systemd would like to use it.
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 01:19:24PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 02/25/2018 12:45 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >>What's our current take on using LTO for Fedora package builds?
>
> >systemd would like to use it.
>
> Why? What are the benefits?
There's a small change in size. Whe
On 02/25/2018 12:45 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
What's our current take on using LTO for Fedora package builds?
systemd would like to use it.
Why? What are the benefits?
Thanks,
Florian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproje
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 03:50:38PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:28:20PM +0100, Petr Šplíchal wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > During the last days there have been concerns raised regarding
> > what is an appropriate content for the tests namespace. [1] My
> > original idea w
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:04:46AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Some packages use LTO (link-time optimization) with the GNU toolchain.
>
> In the past, this was problematic because the generated debugging
> information was not quite usable. Today, it causes problems with
> some of the hardening
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:33:57AM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Thursday, February 22, 2018 3:50:38 PM CET Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:28:20PM +0100, Petr Šplíchal wrote:
> > > When, for a particular package, it is the most efficient way to
> > > maintain tests in a
On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:19:35AM +0100, Petr Šplíchal wrote:
> On 22 February 2018 at 15:50, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 05:28:20PM +0100, Petr Šplíchal wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> During the last days there have been concerns raised regarding
> >> what is an appropriate
Some packages use LTO (link-time optimization) with the GNU toolchain.
In the past, this was problematic because the generated debugging
information was not quite usable. Today, it causes problems with some
of the hardening quality control tooling because the annobin GCC plug-in
may not be ac
Hi,
It's depressing that there have been no meetings and so many difficulties
with compose, and the only meeting that took place I couldn't attend.
* sigh *
I had a couple of things to discuss, but I see they will have to wait.
Kind regards,
Silvia
FAS: Lailah
On 25 February 2018 at 07:09, Adam
20 matches
Mail list logo
