Richard Shaw wrote:
> $ fedpkg request-branch
> Could not execute request_branch: The "token" value must be set under the
> "fedpkg.pagure" section in your "fedpkg" user configuration
WTF?! So, instead of going to a web interface and making the change (old,
now discontinued, pkgdb), we now have
Chenxiong Qi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:09 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>> * rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
>>
>> In the past, it was necessary to clean the buildroot at
>> the beginning of %install and the end of %clean. This is
>> no longer true and not needed since F12.
>
> Not needed in EL6 as we
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:09 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Hi,
> I am sometimes reviewing spec files and I very often see common mistakes. I
> mean in packages which are already in
> Fedora. For a long time and they have some dust from past times.
>
> I am not going to file bug reports as those are
Hi
Per GifLib5 change [1] I plan to start updating to giflib-5.1.4 tomorrow
evening. I'll start by building giflib-5.1.4 and then follow with the
transition package compat-giflib-4-1.6, which will provide the old
giflib-4.x dependency during the transition to giflib-5.x. Subsequently,
I'll re
On 10/02/18 12:54, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> David Sommerseth wrote:
>> I doubt Koji was primarily built for "does this work?"-builds. It exists
>> to build proper packages targeting Fedora repositories.
>
> But that is the point, to build a proper package:
>
> do {
> try build;
> } while (!build
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 15:05 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018, at 2:57 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>
> > I'm thinking about passing --cap-lints warnings to rustc to prevent
> > erroring on
> > this (and just show warning). Should we
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018, at 2:57 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> I'm thinking about passing --cap-lints warnings to rustc to prevent erroring
> on
> this (and just show warning). Should we do same for C/C++? Or should I
> reconsider decision in Rust land?
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-
On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 12:32 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Jakub Jelinek
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 06:42:00AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> > > A scratch build works fine on Fedora 27...
> >
> >
> >
> > Likely http://gcc.gnu.org/PR83204 .
>
> Look
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:32:47PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 06:42:00AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > > A scratch build works fine on Fedora 27...
> >
> > Likely http://gcc.gnu.org/PR83204 .
>
>
> Looks lik
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 06:42:00AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > A scratch build works fine on Fedora 27...
>
> Likely http://gcc.gnu.org/PR83204 .
Looks like it, rebuilding with C++11 let it complete. Would rebuilding with
11 cause an A
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 06:42:00AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> A scratch build works fine on Fedora 27...
Likely http://gcc.gnu.org/PR83204 .
Jakub
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Robert-André Mauchin
wrote:
>
> I wasn't even aware of this new use of fedpkg, but you could just have
> looked
> the help instead of searcghinq the source code:
Always in the place you don't look... :)
Thanks,
Richard
_
I must agree with Kevin that taking every single commit message and putting
it into changelog without further tweaking
might just produce lots of redundant and not really desired lines in the
output. But I think something still can be done.
When you invoke `rpkg tag` (the same goes for `fedpkg tag`
On samedi 10 février 2018 14:48:04 CET Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> So I went to request a new branch of an existing package only to find out
> fedrepo-req-branch, which hasn't been around that long is already
> depreceated and the facility brought into fedpkg... so:
>
> $ fedpkg request-branch
> Cou
please see if helps [1] the meassage just have 5 days :)
[1]https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproj
ect.org/message/KS6QZQHNFCFEVJPJMFWITYWV3AHRSX5E/
On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 07:48 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> So I went to request a new branch of an existing package o
On Sat, 10 Feb 2018, Richard Shaw wrote:
A scratch build works fine on Fedora 27...
Error during build[1]:
*** WARNING *** there are active plugins, do not report this as a bug unless
you can reproduce it without enabling any plugins.
Event | Plugins
PLUGIN_FINISH_UNI
On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 06:42 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> A scratch build works fine on Fedora 27...
>
> Error during build[1]:
> *** WARNING *** there are active plugins, do not report this as a bug
> unless you can reproduce it without enabling any plugins.
> Event| Pl
So I went to request a new branch of an existing package only to find out
fedrepo-req-branch, which hasn't been around that long is already
depreceated and the facility brought into fedpkg... so:
$ fedpkg request-branch
Could not execute request_branch: The "token" value must be set under the
"f
> On 09/02/18 15:01 -, Martin Gansser wrote:
>
> This suggests the package is not using the mariadb API correctly, and
> should be including a different header.
>
>
> And this is probably for the same reason: is not part of
> the public API for mariadb clients.
>
> Did you try replacing a
A scratch build works fine on Fedora 27...
Error during build[1]:
*** WARNING *** there are active plugins, do not report this as a bug
unless you can reproduce it without enabling any plugins.
Event| Plugins
PLUGIN_FINISH_UNIT | annobin: Generate final an
On 02/09/2018 03:13 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 12:20:09PM +0530, Sinny Kumari wrote:
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Daniel Walsh wrote:
Not yet. We are working on packaging podman which would give users the same
experience as Docker CLI without requiring a
David Sommerseth wrote:
> I doubt Koji was primarily built for "does this work?"-builds. It exists
> to build proper packages targeting Fedora repositories.
But that is the point, to build a proper package:
do {
try build;
} while (!build succeeded);
and the output is a working package.
> To
22 matches
Mail list logo
