-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello,
- From time to time I see upstreams using -Werror (or, #[deny(warnings)] in
Rust)
which is definitely causing problems when gcc or any other compiler adds new
warnings. Unfortunately, some upstreams reject removing -Werror and use it just
f
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. It's a
public holiday here in Canada, and I don't think there are any urgent
topics at this time. We'll definitely catch up with a meeting next
week.
If anyone would like to have a meeting, and is willing to run it in my
place, please jus
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the blocker review meeting for
Monday. Once again there are no proposed blockers for Beta or Final
at this time, so nothing to talk about. Thanks!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
On 09/02/18 23:46, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> David Sommerseth wrote:
>> Doesn't 'fedpkg mockbuild' resolve those test builds? To my knowledge,
>> this is fairly close to what koji does under the hood. Then you'll have
>> everything tested locally, git tree can be cleaned up and be in a
>> reasonable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Thanks, Dusty!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQI6BAEBCgAkHRxDaGljYWdvIDxjaGljYWdvQGFpcm1haWwuY2M+BQJafjgSAAoJ
ENL3SmB5LsIajfkQALNdt8hFDY0eMoMuneS0mZjpAEnwZGcHRp2dnGrGZUDg0Nu7
QRL8UikK+uGteQy27ybQsXwBfsNGpLNpELgu4ObevjBoqx+D0bSrbp/H3ZkJY861
KXemaX7RS
David Sommerseth wrote:
> Doesn't 'fedpkg mockbuild' resolve those test builds? To my knowledge,
> this is fairly close to what koji does under the hood. Then you'll have
> everything tested locally, git tree can be cleaned up and be in a
> reasonable shape before being pushed out.
I'm surely no
On 02/09/2018 03:54 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Well, it doesn't appear to be completely broken as lots of builds are succeeding.
I think you'll need the contents of config.log to see what is happening here.
Thanks, Orion.
It was a Wine configure bug. Introduced by:
https://source.winehq.or
On 09/02/18 23:09, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kamil Dudka wrote:
>> Would not it be then better to work on this in a staging branch and rework
>> those commits before they are pushed to a production branch? I am myself
>> not interested in going through commits like "fix a typo", "forgot to bump
>> rel
Rex Dieter wrote:
> (I know this would be handled automatically if the Qt_5_PRIVATE_API symbol
> was versioned, but that's an option we'd rather avoid if reasonably
> possible)
IMHO, the right approach is to do just that. There is already a patch that
does this:
https://build.opensuse.org/package/
Neal Gompa wrote:
> Mageia, OpenMandriva, and PLD all generate their changelogs from the
> source control system.
[snip]
> SUSE uses the Open Build Service VCS export to changes files which are
> converted into changelog entries at package build time.
All these distros have in common that their ch
Kamil Dudka wrote:
> Would not it be then better to work on this in a staging branch and rework
> those commits before they are pushed to a production branch? I am myself
> not interested in going through commits like "fix a typo", "forgot to bump
> release", "add missing BR", "revert the previous
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
A couple of us went on the LUP podcast this week to talk about Atomic
Host/Workstation.
Check it out: https://twitter.com/jupitersignal/status/961283877883977728. We
start around minute 16:20.
Dusty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIzBAEBCAAdF
Hello,
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 02/09/2018 03:34 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Matthew Miller
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 05:02:10PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>>>
It seems that a lot of people have %file, %check
On 02/09/2018 12:33 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
I've tried two builds over the past couple hours that result in
failures. Other architectures are building.
Is there something wrong in glibc/gcc/makefile for armv7hl?
build.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/408/24900408/build
On 02/09/2018 02:19 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
You need to reference the root task, it's hard to get back to that
from the .log files, and it allows people to see other things that
isn't just pure logs which are useful for debug.
The task ID is in the URL.
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//wo
On 9 February 2018 at 15:33, Rex Dieter wrote:
> I'm exploring possibilities on how to track usage of a particular library
> symbol via rpm dependencies.
>
> In particular, whenever a package is built that includes a dependency on
> library symbol:
> libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5_PRIVATE_API)
>
> I'd like
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 7:33 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> I've tried two builds over the past couple hours that result in failures.
> Other architectures are building.
You need to reference the root task, it's hard to get back to that
from the .log files, and it allows people to see other thin
I've tried two builds over the past couple hours that result in failures. Other
architectures are building.
Is there something wrong in glibc/gcc/makefile for armv7hl?
build.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/408/24900408/build.log
root.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//w
Hi,
This week I've started poking at packaging pre-release builds of the new
OpenVPN 3 based client for Linux (sorry, no server support yet). I've started
a Copr build/repo for it and I'd appreciate some help reviewing the packaging
and otherwise hints (or pathces) how to improve things.
You'll
There will be an outage starting at 2018-02-11 15:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 2 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-02-11 15:00 UTC'
Reason for outage: The network switches in our PHX2 colocation
requir
On 09/02/18 16:53 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 09/02/18 08:34 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
Someone else suggested changelogs could be inserted during koji build
time. That would be interesting to look into.
If a koji build page just showed the Git commit logs since the last
build that could b
On 09/02/18 08:34 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
Someone else suggested changelogs could be inserted during koji build
time. That would be interesting to look into.
If a koji build page just showed the Git commit logs since the last
build that could be far more useful than showing hundreds of lines
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 2018-02-08 at 13:32 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 05:02:10PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > It seems that a lot of people have %file, %check, %build, %whatsoever
> > in their changelog section.
> > Is there any reaso
On 09/02/18 15:01 -, Martin Gansser wrote:
Hi,
vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.128 compiles fine on f26 but not on higher fedora version,
something changed on F27 and rawhide, program
make[1]: Entering directory
'/home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.128/epglv'
gcc -c -I/usr/include/mysql -fP
Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> I'm exploring possibilities on how to track usage of a particular library
>> symbol via rpm dependencies.
>>
>> In particular, whenever a package is built that includes a dependency on
>> library symbol:
>> libQt5Core.so.5(
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> I'm exploring possibilities on how to track usage of a particular library
> symbol via rpm dependencies.
>
> In particular, whenever a package is built that includes a dependency on
> library symbol:
> libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5_PRIVATE_API)
>
> I'd l
I'm exploring possibilities on how to track usage of a particular library
symbol via rpm dependencies.
In particular, whenever a package is built that includes a dependency on
library symbol:
libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5_PRIVATE_API)
I'd like to inject additional dependencies, something like:
Requires:
Hi,
Since a week or so my laptop has severe SATA issues when running on
battery-only.
Was APLM enabled by accident in Fedora-27 (I know there are currently
experiments going on for Rawhide / F28):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543493
Best regards, Clemens
_
Hi,
vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.128 compiles fine on f26 but not on higher fedora version,
something changed on F27 and rawhide, program
make[1]: Entering directory
'/home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/vdr-epg-daemon-1.1.128/epglv'
gcc -c -I/usr/include/mysql -fPIC -L/usr/lib64/mysql -L/usr/lib64/ -lmariadb
-l
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 03:55:26PM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Friday, 09 February 2018 at 09:50, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> > > 9.02.2018 08:41 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Rafal Luzynski wrote:
>
On Friday, 09 February 2018 at 09:50, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> > 9.02.2018 08:41 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> > > > Requires: libstdc++.so.6
> > >
> > > That needs to be libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) on x86_
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 9:22 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
>
> Koji, or fedpkg, or better yet some hook in rpm itself. It's not exactly
> rocket science we're talking about here if people are ready to give it a go.
>
> Neal, doesn't Mageia (and Mandriva) pull package changelogs from SCM
> already? D
On 02/09/2018 03:34 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 05:02:10PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
It seems that a lot of people have %file, %check, %build, %whatsoever
in their changelog section.
Is there any reason I should not go a
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 05:02:10PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>> It seems that a lot of people have %file, %check, %build, %whatsoever
>> in their changelog section.
>> Is there any reason I should not go and automatically escape them?
>
> T
9.02.2018 09:50 Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> > 9.02.2018 08:41 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> > > > Requires: libstdc++.so.6
> > >
> > > That needs to be libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) on x86_64 and other 64-bit
>
Dne 9.2.2018 v 09:21 Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>> Second, there's package maintainer changelogs. These are really
>> redundant with the dist-git log. We don't really need this anymore.
>> It's just a chore.
> My %changelog entries are not identical to the dist-git commit mess
On Friday, February 9, 2018 9:21:27 AM CET Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> > Second, there's package maintainer changelogs. These are really
> > redundant with the dist-git log. We don't really need this anymore.
> > It's just a chore.
>
>
> My %changelog entries are not identica
Hi José,
are you still around? You activity suddenly stops around May 28th
2017, I hope nothing serious happened.
grace package needs attention:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471223,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517243.
Zbyszek
_
> zdohnal cups-filters net-tools system-config-printer
I checked system-config-printer and there are only '% ' and '%,' in
changelog, which aren't rpm macros. Others are escaped in changelog, no
need to fixing it.
--
Zdenek Dohnal
Associate Software Engineer
Red Hat Czech - Brno TPB-C
sig
On 02/08/2018 04:53 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Brett Lentz wrote:
On 08/02/18 14:09 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
* rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
rpmdev-newspec still inserts this. It may be worthwhile to file a bug to get
it to stop.
The only reason I haven't droppe
On 02/09/2018 09:18 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I've went and fixed 493 packages (listed below). If it broke something, please
let me know. I checked diff briefly and don't think that I broke anything…
Did you ask FESCO? If not you, have abused your
Hi,
I know Noriko, I can contact her if you want. I think she retired from the
project for personal, but I can ask her.
Regards,
Silvia
FAS: Lailah
On 7 February 2018 at 19:27, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for these package
> maintainers are no lo
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 09:48:30AM +0100, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> 9.02.2018 08:41 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >
> >
> > Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> > > Requires: libstdc++.so.6
> >
> > That needs to be libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) on x86_64 and other 64-bit multilib
> > architectures though.
>
> I know and this
9.02.2018 08:41 Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
>
> Rafal Luzynski wrote:
> > Requires: libstdc++.so.6
>
> That needs to be libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) on x86_64 and other 64-bit multilib
> architectures though.
I know and this was going to be my next question: what magic
operator to use to generate the correc
On Friday, February 9, 2018 9:25:33 AM CET Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 08:57 +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 8, 2018 5:02:10 PM CET Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > > Hello everyone,
> > >
> > > It seems that a lot of people have %file, %check, %build, %whatsoever in
- Mail original -
De: "Terry Barnaby"
>If
>it was important to get the data to disk it would have been using
>fsync(), FS sync, or some other transaction based app
??? Many people use NFS NAS because doing RAID+Backup on every client is too
expensive. So yes, they *are* using NFS be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 08:57 +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Thursday, February 8, 2018 5:02:10 PM CET Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > It seems that a lot of people have %file, %check, %build, %whatsoever in
> > their
> > changelog
De: "Przemek Klosowski"
Hi,
> Many environments (corporate, government) actually require keeping track
> of this stuff, so addressing it would help the acceptance of Fedora and
> Redhat in such environments
Then have Koji or Bohdi insert accurate changelogs at build time. Can't be less
reliab
Matthew Miller wrote:
> Second, there's package maintainer changelogs. These are really
> redundant with the dist-git log. We don't really need this anymore.
> It's just a chore.
My %changelog entries are not identical to the dist-git commit messages:
1. It often takes me several git commits to m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I've went and fixed 493 packages (listed below). If it broke something, please
let me know. I checked diff briefly and don't think that I broke anything…
Maintainers by package:
389-console mreynolds nhosoi nkinder rmeggins
389-ds-base
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 12:20:09PM +0530, Sinny Kumari wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 8:25 PM, Daniel Walsh wrote:
> > Not yet. We are working on packaging podman which would give users the same
> > experience as Docker CLI without requiring a Daemon. That would be the
> > thing to replace
> Th
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:06:05PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: VA-API 1.0.0 =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/VA-API_1.0.0
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Nicolas Chauvet
>
> This change is about upgrading libva and others to version 2.0. This
> change affects s
David Tardon wrote:
> * diffpdf
> - apparently not OSS anymore, so an update is unlikely
The Debian package:
https://packages.debian.org/sid/utils/diffpdf
has a patch to build diffpdf against poppler-qt5.
> * krop
> - uses python-poppler-qt4
> - unknown status
There's a fork with Qt 5 and Python
53 matches
Mail list logo
