Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> On 2018-01-13 10:35 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> I'm trying to rebuild blender due to a new OpenImageIO build in
>> rawhide but I'm getting a strage error[0] that doesn't appear to be
>> transient (happening for several days now):
>>
>> from checkout.log:
>> $ git clone -n
On 2018-01-13 10:35 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm trying to rebuild blender due to a new OpenImageIO build in
> rawhide but I'm getting a strage error[0] that doesn't appear to be
> transient (happening for several days now):
>
> from checkout.log:
> $ git clone -n https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpm
On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 16:13:24 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> I believe the script runs at least daily so if you see something wrong then do
> report it :)
Here's a recently opened ticket about package "aide":
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 11:17:42 +
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?i
I'm trying to rebuild blender due to a new OpenImageIO build in rawhide but
I'm getting a strage error[0] that doesn't appear to be transient
(happening for several days now):
from checkout.log:
$ git clone -n https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/blender.git
/var/lib/mock/f28-build-11036148-838686/r
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 10:40:36AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> That's just all the more reason to publish the branched packages in CentOS
> Git as soon as they're branched, or even maintain them in Fedora dist-git.
> But I'm not holding my breath for it to happen any time soon.
I wouldn't sugge
On 01/13/2018 08:50 AM, Steve Dickson wrote:
> So I guess the next question is what the current
> nobody id (25) used for and why does it exist?
Doing some research on this back in Aug 2001
nfsnobody was added to nfs-utils for the reasons stated in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2
On 01/12/2018 07:32 PM, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 07:20 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
>> Instead of doing the blow by blow these threads
>> always turn into I'm just going jump to the point.
>>
>> systemd wants to use uid 65534 and it can't because
>> NFS is using it. So instea
On 01/12/2018 05:11 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> Side Note: I have a ping out to a SUSE guy to see how they handle this
>> but the guy lives on the other side of the earth so I probably
>> will not get a response until tomorrow.
> I can tell you what that is, as I run (open)SUSE systems.
>
> SUSE syst
>> I don't think having them sit in testing hurts anything but my OCD...
It's a PITA when creating other packages, you don't know if you can target
testing state or if it will never be pushed to stable
Regards,
--
Nicolas Mailhot
___
devel mailing l
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 5:28 AM, Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that for multiple release we have updates which stuck in bodhi
> for
> many months until distro goes EOL.
>
> I wonder if we should
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello,
I noticed that for multiple release we have updates which stuck in bodhi for
many months until distro goes EOL.
I wonder if we should just auto-unpush updates which are in testing in 1(?)
month? Thoughts?
- --
- -Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PG
Peter Robinson wrote:
> Well given it's based on Fedora and most of the pre work happens in
> Fedora (hence the request for ensuring the conditionals are correct) I
> think that's relatively upstream. Also a lot of the packages actually
> have the same specs in Fedora/RHEL/CentOS, a lot of the RHEL
12 matches
Mail list logo
