On Sun, 2017-12-31 at 16:34 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 03:59:13PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > When it thinks this, it defaults to a mode where it wants to make
> > anything submitted to Bugzilla private, and it seems that in this mode,
> > even when it knows a
On Sat, 2017-12-23 at 15:23 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hello.
> I'm going submit opencv 3.1 in rawhide to fix a lots of CVE(s) [1]
> and
> new feature also have a new module with compatibly with mlt
> TBH I though/expect someone from RedHat take care of it .
>
> I will send more new after t
On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 10:37:33 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 5:16 AM, bugzilla redhat com wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529276
> >
> > Bug ID: 1529276
> >Summary: findbugs-contrib-7.2.0.sb is available
> >Product:
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 03:59:13PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> When it thinks this, it defaults to a mode where it wants to make
> anything submitted to Bugzilla private, and it seems that in this mode,
> even when it knows a report is a dupe, it won't just add a comment to
> the parent bug, al
Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 25/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171230.n.1):
ID: 183152 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedo
On 31/12/17 13:51, Neal Becker wrote:
As shown here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2518
mercurial-4.4.2-1.fc28
is built, but
dnf --enablerepo=rawhide --show info mercurial
doesn't show it. Is there now another step needed beyond just fedpkg build?
Well it was in
As shown here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2518
mercurial-4.4.2-1.fc28
is built, but
dnf --enablerepo=rawhide --show info mercurial
doesn't show it. Is there now another step needed beyond just fedpkg build?
___
devel ma
