On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 12:39:08AM +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Who is "we" that "decided" to cancel the running elections? What were the
> reasons for this "decision"? I object to this strongly. It doesn't look
> like this "decision" was made through an open process as is the usu
> because I can no longer cherry-pick between branches.
Not true at all - you’d be surprised how well git deals with cherry
picks across diverse branches. And even when it doesn’t there’s very
rarely anything in a spec file that would be a difficult conflict to
resolve. At work I often cherry pick
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Voting period is in progress on 2017-12-09 from 00:00:00 to 00:00:00 UTC
The meeting will be about:
The Voting period of the currently running Fedora Elections in progress. Please
vote for your candidates to Council [1], Mindshare[2] and FE
On Thursday, 07 December 2017 at 18:54, Jan Kurik wrote:
> During the Autumn 2017 Election cycle we wanted to try a new approach
> in the way how Elections are organized [1]. Unfortunately, at the
> beginning of the Voting period we realized the new way does not work
> as expected [2] and even we t
On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 16:19 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 00:04 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > hum Markdown plugin is build with GTK3 , the plus of GTK+ is
> > confusing
> > me
>
> GTK+ is the correct name of the project and the product. It is not
> called GTK. "GTK+
On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 10:31 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What do I have to do to stop random people
> from making random changes to packages I maintain?
>
> How do people get this type of permission?
>
> Case in point;
>
> commit 358a8fff974f0e124527a3281c90fa04cb7c7a7f (HEAD -> m
Steve Dickson wrote:
> Where committed to the master branch and not to any other
> branch make the maintenance of those branches a pain
> because I can no longer cherry-pick between branches.
> I have to make multiple commits to multiple branches
> which sucks... Something random people do not unde
Jan Kurik wrote:
> During the Autumn 2017 Election cycle we wanted to try a new approach
> in the way how Elections are organized [1]. Unfortunately, at the
> beginning of the Voting period we realized the new way does not work
> as expected [2] and even we tried to put some mitigation plan in plac
On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 10:31 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
> Where committed to the master branch and not to any other
> branch make the maintenance of those branches a pain
> because I can no longer cherry-pick between branches.
> I have to make multiple commits to multiple branches
> which sucks..
On Thu, 7 Dec 2017, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Provenpackager_policy
> These were properly announced:
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/RJYQNLIWBAVQPGLIGUT77WGY5D4TK334/
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/
On 12/07/2017 04:31 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
Where committed to the master branch and not to any other
branch make the maintenance of those branches a pain
because I can no longer cherry-pick between branches.
Maybe you can elaborate on how this causes problems for your development
process, an
On 2017-12-07 09:31, Steve Dickson wrote:
> What do I have to do to stop random people
> from making random changes to packages I maintain?
>
> How do people get this type of permission?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Provenpackager_policy
> Case in point;
[snip]
These were properly announced
During the Autumn 2017 Election cycle we wanted to try a new approach
in the way how Elections are organized [1]. Unfortunately, at the
beginning of the Voting period we realized the new way does not work
as expected [2] and even we tried to put some mitigation plan in place
[3], we have not succee
Hello,
What do I have to do to stop random people
from making random changes to packages I maintain?
How do people get this type of permission?
Case in point;
commit 358a8fff974f0e124527a3281c90fa04cb7c7a7f (HEAD -> master, origin/master,
origin/HEAD)
Author: Igor Gnatenko
Date: Tue Nov 7
On 6 December 2017 at 05:33, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
>> We have solved this years ago. man alternatives
>
> alternatives is a terrible solution if you ask me. Symlink hackery in
> /etc/alternatives is awful and I these days with Fedora kernel
Hello,
This happens to me when I try to report dnfdragora crashes in Gnome. It
doesn't happen in KDE mainly because dnfdragora doesn't crash there.
Regards,
Silvia
2017-11-28 7:46 GMT+01:00 Adam Williamson :
> On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 22:10 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > I'm on a Fedora 27 Worksta
On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 16:01 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On 12/02/2017 01:15 PM, Fedora Rawhide Report sent this report, quoted
> in its entirety:
> > ___
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to de
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171204.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171204.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
S
On 05/12/17 23:53, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 12/05/2017 01:56 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> When somebody writes a comment in Bugzilla, I am receiving an email from
>> Bugzilla and another email from FMN: two emails for each comment. I
>> haven't seen this type of behavior in any other project.
> This
On 06/12/17 00:21, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Sorry to reply to myself here, but I meant to reply to this part and
> forgot:
>
> On 12/05/2017 02:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On 12/05/2017 01:56 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>
>>> My observation is that the people who "like" email are simply not aware
>>> of
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 10:26:11AM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 09:56:28AM +0100, Lumir Balhar wrote:
> > On 12/05/2017 04:27 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > Maybe a Fedora Change coordinating this would be nice?
>
> probably a good idea.
To follow-up on this, I'm drafting
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2017-12-06 10:26 GMT+01:00 Matthias Runge :
> > On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 09:56:28AM +0100, Lumir Balhar wrote:
> >> On 12/05/2017 04:27 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> > Maybe a Fedora Change coordinating this would be nice?
> >
> > probably a
Hi!
While working on adding CI tests [0] using the Standard Test
Interface a need arose to have a shared git repository where tests
could be stored:
* A large number of test files makes a dist-git repository more
difficult to maintain
* Tests might follow a different branching pattern than
6.12.2017 15:47 Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>
>
> Do you speak (I think) Korean and English? Can you code? If so, I
> could use your help.
>
> The Fedora-associated FreeOTP project has received this pull request:
> https://github.com/freeotp/freeotp-android/pull/165
>
> The comments and commit descr
Hello,
I am looking for an alternative for Java logstash application (not in
Fedora) that can parse logs (e.g. httpd access.log) and collect stats about
number of occurrences for a given search pattern (basically it can e.g.
group by IP and give number of lines for each IP and then post it to some
25 matches
Mail list logo
