Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171101.n.0 changes

2017-10-31 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171031.n.2 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171101.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 2 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages

Schedule for Wednesday's FPC Meeting (2017-11-01 17:00 UTC)

2017-10-31 Thread James Antill
 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Wednesday at 2017-11-01 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on irc.freenode.net.  Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Wednesday = 2017-11-01 10:00 PDT  US/Pacific 2017-11-01

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171031.n.2 changes

2017-10-31 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171031.n.2 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171031.n.2 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages

Re: Review swaps

2017-10-31 Thread Sandro Mani
On 31.10.2017 22:43, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: ── 1508034 Review Request: rssguard - Simple yet powerful feed reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1508034 ── 1508002 Review Request: uTox - The lightweight Tox client │ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug

Review swaps

2017-10-31 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
Hello, I've added a bunch of packages to review, I'll review yours in exchange of mine. No Java or PHP packages as I'm not familiar with those. Here is the list with each dependency: ── 1508034 Review Request: rssguard - Simple yet powerful feed reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show

Re: Remove old GPG keys?

2017-10-31 Thread R P Herrold
On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, David Cantrell wrote: > I don't really consider this a thing about saving space or making the > output of 'rpm -qa' look nicer or something, but rather being good users > of GPG. As noted but not addressed, which keys actually have been signed at GnuPG key-signing WoT 'par

Re: Remove old GPG keys?

2017-10-31 Thread Sam Varshavchik
David Cantrell writes: I don't really consider this a thing about saving space or making the output of 'rpm -qa' look nicer or something, but rather being good users of GPG. If we create and then phase out signing keys, then part of our process should also involve sending revocations for the ol

Re: Remove old GPG keys?

2017-10-31 Thread Christopher
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 3:06 PM David Cantrell wrote: > On 10/31/2017 11:32 AM, R P Herrold wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, David Cantrell wrote: > > > >>> # rpm -qa gpg-pubkey --qf "%{version}-%{release} %{summary}\n"|wc -l > >>> 64 > >> > >> Do we issue revocations for old keys? If not, let's

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171031.n.2 changes

2017-10-31 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171031.n.2 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171031.n.2 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

2017-10-31 Thread Umar Parooq
i want to take python-libdiscid if there was no one on it On Oct 23, 2017 8:26 PM, "Ville Skyttä" wrote: > Hello, > > The following packages are looking for new maintainers, ping me if > you're able to help out. > > 1) No co-maintainers at the moment: > > - git-bz > - isrcsubmit > - jing-trang

Re: Remove old GPG keys?

2017-10-31 Thread David Cantrell
On 10/31/2017 11:32 AM, R P Herrold wrote: > On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, David Cantrell wrote: > >>> # rpm -qa gpg-pubkey --qf "%{version}-%{release} %{summary}\n"|wc -l >>> 64 >> >> Do we issue revocations for old keys? If not, let's do that and extend >> dnf to honor those and clean up? > > What is t

Re: Remove old GPG keys?

2017-10-31 Thread David Sommerseth
On 31/10/17 18:46, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 17:34 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: >> On 10/31/2017 04:57 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: [...snip...] >>> Correct me if I'm wrong, but we only check keys at installation >>> time, so  >>> they'd be able to continue running just fine, but t

Fedora Modular bikeshed compose report: 20171026.n.0 changes

2017-10-31 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171026.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171026.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped pac

Re: Remove old GPG keys?

2017-10-31 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 17:34 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 10/31/2017 04:57 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:49 AM Michael Cronenworth > om  > > > wrote: > > > > On 10/31/2017 03:52 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > >  > And I won

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171031.n.2 changes

2017-10-31 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171028.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171031.n.2 = SUMMARY = Added images:21 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 22 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 63 Downgraded packages: 144 Size of added packages: 1.08 GiB Size of dropped

Unretire python-diff-cover

2017-10-31 Thread Randy Barlow
Greetings! I would like to unretire python-diff-cover. It seems to have been retired due to being orphaned without being adopted. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1508020 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel maili

Fedora 27-20171031.n.0 compose check report

2017-10-31 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 11/137 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171029.n.0): ID: 163456 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/163456 ID: 163

Unretire python-jinja2_pluralize

2017-10-31 Thread Randy Barlow
Greetings! I would like to unretire python-jinja2_pluralize. It seems to have been retired due to being orphaned without being adopted. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1508016 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel

Re: [Rawhide] gawk API changes heads up

2017-10-31 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Tuesday, October 31, 2017 2:56:59 PM CET David Kaspar [Dee'Kej] wrote: > Hello folks! :) > > The new major version of GNU awk (gawk) was released recently, and this > version introduced a new API (version 2.0). I want to give all of you a > heads up that I'm planning to do a rebase in Rawhide n

Re: Packages looking for new maintainers

2017-10-31 Thread Umar Parooq
hello i fix can you assign python-libdiscid for me here are my nicknamp pyc0d3r On Oct 23, 2017 8:26 PM, "Ville Skyttä" wrote: > Hello, > > The following packages are looking for new maintainers, ping me if > you're able to help out. > > 1) No co-maintainers at the moment: > > - git-bz > - isrcsu

Fedora 27 compose report: 20171031.n.0 changes

2017-10-31 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-27-20171029.n.0 NEW: Fedora-27-20171031.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 6 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of

Re: Remove old GPG keys?

2017-10-31 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 10/31/2017 04:57 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:49 AM Michael Cronenworth > wrote: On 10/31/2017 03:52 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > And I wonder: is it a good idea to keep old gpg keys in RPM db? Or should we automate the removal

Re: Remove old GPG keys?

2017-10-31 Thread R P Herrold
On Tue, 31 Oct 2017, David Cantrell wrote: > > # rpm -qa gpg-pubkey --qf "%{version}-%{release} %{summary}\n"|wc -l > > 64 > > Do we issue revocations for old keys? If not, let's do that and extend > dnf to honor those and clean up? What is the 'use case' for potentially preventing installation

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171031.n.1 changes

2017-10-31 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171028.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171031.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:21 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 22 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 63 Downgraded packages: 144 Size of added packages: 1.08 GiB Size of dropped

Re: Remove old GPG keys?

2017-10-31 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:49 AM Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 10/31/2017 03:52 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > And I wonder: is it a good idea to keep old gpg keys in RPM db? Or > should we automate the removal of old keys? > > I'd be all for cleaning up old keys. > > However, I would be cautiou

Re: Remove old GPG keys?

2017-10-31 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 10/31/2017 03:52 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: And I wonder: is it a good idea to keep old gpg keys in RPM db? Or should we automate the removal of old keys? I'd be all for cleaning up old keys. However, I would be cautious to not delete keys that are still in use. Example: User has Fedora 29

Re: Remove old GPG keys?

2017-10-31 Thread David Cantrell
On 10/31/2017 10:15 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > On 10/31/2017 09:52 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> I just stumbled upon >> >> https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/400634/does-anyone-bother-to-remove-rpmkeys >> with the nice link to: >> >> https://blog.laimbock.com/2014/05/02/how-to-remove-a

Re: Remove old GPG keys?

2017-10-31 Thread Roberto Ragusa
On 10/31/2017 09:52 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > I just stumbled upon > > https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/400634/does-anyone-bother-to-remove-rpmkeys > with the nice link to: > > https://blog.laimbock.com/2014/05/02/how-to-remove-an-imported-gpg-key-from-rpm/ > And I wonder: is it a g

[Rawhide] gawk API changes heads up

2017-10-31 Thread David Kaspar [Dee'Kej]
Hello folks! :) The new major version of GNU awk (gawk) was released recently, and this version introduced a new API (version 2.0). I want to give all of you a heads up that I'm planning to do a rebase in Rawhide next week (probably on Tuesday, November 7th, if everything goes OK). If you have an

Remove old GPG keys?

2017-10-31 Thread Miroslav Suchý
I just stumbled upon https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/400634/does-anyone-bother-to-remove-rpmkeys with the nice link to: https://blog.laimbock.com/2014/05/02/how-to-remove-an-imported-gpg-key-from-rpm/ And I wonder: is it a good idea to keep old gpg keys in RPM db? Or should we autom