Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 19/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171021.n.0):
ID: 160595 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation
URL: https://
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.
El dom, 22-10-2017 a las 11:39 -0400, Randy Barlow escribió:
> On 10/22/2017 09:04 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > updates does not have composes it has mashes, the behaviour is
> > expected
> > to be different, the problem boils down to the fact that if a
> > package
> > is made multilib indirectly,
OLD: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171017.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171017.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped pac
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 15/137 (x86_64), 2/22 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 160360 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/160360
ID: 160365 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.
On 10/22/2017 09:04 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> updates does not have composes it has mashes, the behaviour is expected
> to be different, the problem boils down to the fact that if a package
> is made multilib indirectly, i.e. it is only pulled in because some
> external package that is multilib r
Mat Booth wrote:
> On 7 August 2017 at 15:35, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
>> [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.html
>>
>
> This file seems suspiciously small... I somehow don't believe that there
> were "0 failed builds" :-)
Current status?
___
El jue, 19-10-2017 a las 19:29 +0200, Florian Weimer escribió:
> On 10/19/2017 06:42 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> > There is long standing 8+ year old bugs we have never gotten around
> > to
> > to ensure multilib is correct in all cases. It is unfortuantly
> > expected
> > sometimes, it probably