On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 12:05:40AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 18:34:09 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> > > I've not been a maintainer of the package since Fedora 13.
> > >
> > > I'm not listed as a maintainer in pkgdb, although there are three
> > > "Obsolete" entrie
There will be an outage starting at 2017-10-09 21:00UTC, which will last
approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2017-10-09 21:00UTC'
Reason for outage:
We will be upgrading koji to the late
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> If there is one thing I have learned in 20 years of dealing with
> RPMS... DON'T PLAY AROUND WITH EPOCH. It is a hack which should only
> be used as a last resort and a lot of tools are built around that
> assumption.. even if they don
Dear fellow Fedora developers!
I was puzzled by this after upgrading from F25 to F26 on a headless
machine with a pretty minimal set of packages installed (i.e. almost
no libraries related to Xorg or mesa). The upgrade brought in an
updated abrt package which grew a dependency on
python-gobject/pyt
On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 18:34:09 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > I've not been a maintainer of the package since Fedora 13.
> >
> > I'm not listed as a maintainer in pkgdb, although there are three
> > "Obsolete" entries that have been inherited for many years it seems.
>
> You are marked as a
On 08/10/17 01:51 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On dimanche 8 octobre 2017 05:02:11 CEST Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>> On 07/10/17 08:28 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>>> Hello Luya,
>>>
>>> I've worked on this issue this afternoon, you can find the resulting SPEC,
>>> SRPM and patches here: ht
On 08/10/17 01:51 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> I've installed it and can’t reproduce your issue: I can start and add a
> repository just fine.
> I'm sorry I can't help you more.
>
> Robert-André
In that case, could you pull request to the main branch as the
maintainer is active?
Simply fork
Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 15/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171007.n.0):
ID: 153858 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedorapro
On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 05:01:03PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 11:58:56 + (UTC), buildsys fedoraproject org wrote:
>
> > audacity has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> > On x86_64:
> > audacity-2.1.3-6.fc28.x86_64 requires libwx_baseu-3.0-gtk2.so.0()(64bit
On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 05:26:04PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-10-08 at 17:01 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 11:58:56 + (UTC), buildsys fedoraproject org
> > wrote:
> >
> > > audacity has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> > > On x86_64:
> > > au
On Sun, 2017-10-08 at 17:01 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 11:58:56 + (UTC), buildsys fedoraproject org
> wrote:
>
> > audacity has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> > On x86_64:
> > audacity-2.1.3-6.fc28.x86_64 requires libwx_baseu-3.0-
> > gtk2.so.0()(64bit
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 27 Branched 20171008.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 11:58:56 + (UTC), buildsys fedoraproject org wrote:
> audacity has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> On x86_64:
> audacity-2.1.3-6.fc28.x86_64 requires libwx_baseu-3.0-gtk2.so.0()(64bit)
-snip-
Why do I get such an email?
I've not been a maintainer of the pa
Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 78/126 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171007.n.0):
ID: 153705 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedor
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20171007.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20171008.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 10
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 26
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.78 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 10:33:38AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 7, 2017, at 08:14 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>>
>> > Well, my point is that in this case there aren't any big changes, only>
>> > some rel
On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 10:33:38AM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 7, 2017, at 08:14 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> > Well, my point is that in this case there aren't any big changes, only>
> > some relatively minor feature additions. According to the policy,
> > "minor" upg
On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 10:17:31PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > systemd 235 was released today. A large number of issues was closed
> > upstream, including many bug fixes, documentation updates, and
> > long
On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 12:17:15PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 03:04:12PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> systemd 235 was released today. A large number of issues was closed
> >> upst
On dimanche 8 octobre 2017 05:02:11 CEST Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> On 07/10/17 08:28 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> > Hello Luya,
> >
> > I've worked on this issue this afternoon, you can find the resulting SPEC,
> > SRPM and patches here: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/sparkleshare/
> >
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
