Note: You can download the images from
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/27/Fedora-27-20170927.1/compose/
They'll be later copied to
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/27_Beta-1.5/
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 27 Candidate Beta-1.5 is now
available for testing. Please help
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 14/126 (x86_64), 2/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 27 Beta 1.3):
ID: 148093 Test: i386 universal install_btrfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/148093
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2017-09-28 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2017-09-28 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2017-09-28 1
Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Gerald Henriksen [26/09/2017 09:02] :
>>
>> That may be fine for any packagers who are actually paid to package
>> (though even then I would have my doubts that every line of source has
>> been checked), but it is clearly an impossible task in terms of time
>> required f
Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> :O Great! Currently, I can't even imagine maintaining any packages over
> few megabytes (maybe 100MiB tops, which will be a pain!), but not much
> long before, I had a hard time uploading a 21MiB data... specially since
> there is no way to resume uploading a source to lo
adel...@zegrapher.com wrote:
> and Boost for only one small function
Since I was curious, I looked for that function and found it in
polynomial.cpp. But why do you include the headers in polynomial.h? The
usage of Boost in Polynomial::translateX is an implementation detail and so
the headers sh
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Distribution override has been done before in the past to gather data for
> fixing issues (kdbus came in mind).
Is that really a good example? Kdbus was withdrawn by its submitters before
ever entering a mainline kernel (mainly because Linus did not like the
idea). All
> It might be that systemd does not like that rc.local is owned
> by "user" rather then "root"
Unfortunately
# chown root:root /etc/rc.d/rc.local
did not solve the problem, instead manually running the script as root,
changed the
/sys/class/scsi_host/host0/link_power_management_policy
state to
med
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Petr Stodulka wrote:
>
>
> On 4.9.2017 19:27, Michal Novotny wrote:
> > I might contact you for more information, but alright, if you feel the
> custom script is more convenient,
> > then I am all for it. But first, I would like to make a proposal of each
>
Hello Laura,
Is it possible that these 2 bugs, that are probably due to a wrong config, be
fixed in 4.13 ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491521
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470995
More infos : https://github.com/MattDevo/firmware/issues/74
Thanks !
__
On 21/09/17 08:02 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>
> s sparkleshare doesn't have its dependency satisfied.
>
> According to the sparkleshare release notes[0] the 1.3.0; release
> added the gtk3 bindings... so any of those ought to help.
>
> The build dependencies are more complex than I can do in a few m
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Beta release Go/No-Go Meeting - 3rd round on 2017-09-28 from 17:00:00 to
19:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to
determ
Hi,
On 26-09-17 16:59, Germano Massullo wrote:
This message may be useful to others having my similar problem.
On a Thinkpad X220, after having booted the custom kernel, running
[root@machine]# cat /sys/class/scsi_host/host0/link_power_management_policy
I get
max_performance
instead of
med_
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48085
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/0c948151c8e29b905b0a96203a835d21f5992d450856cf6277e0acd77b989845-0001-Encryption-changelog-tests.patch
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48085/comment/465453/edit
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/b76ff898d193193379fab90a1edd92ba78472d56654e2ccea0694020deb83355-0001-mmrepl-state-tests.patch
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedora
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48085
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/3f8653a217454e37fc3b06819a8e3e70b2f0114f6ba9a204a37ec245efc2a038-0001-Encryption-changelog-tests.patch
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 09/27/2017 03:11 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Jan Kurik said:
This change causes extra information to be stored in binary files
compiled by gcc. This information can be used by scripts to check on
various features of the file, such as the hardening options used of
potential ABI c
Once upon a time, Jan Kurik said:
> This change causes extra information to be stored in binary files
> compiled by gcc. This information can be used by scripts to check on
> various features of the file, such as the hardening options used of
> potential ABI conflicts.
One thing that is not menti
To enable this change it is proposed that the redhat-rpm-config
package should be extended to add the "-fplugin=annobin" option to the
__global_compiler-flags macro. In theory such a change will be
completely invisible to Fedora users but should prove to be very
helpful to Fedora Release Managemen
= Proposed System Wide Change: Annobin =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Annobin
Change owner(s):
* Nick Clifton
This change causes extra information to be stored in binary files
compiled by gcc. This information can be used by scripts to check on
various features of the file, such as the
2017-09-27 14:57 GMT+03:00 M.S. :
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm a research student pursuing my Masters in IIIT-Hyderabad. I am keen on
> working on the 389 Directory Server project for Outreachy.
>
> I have prior experience in configuring, maintaining and managing systems
> in an MHRD(Ministry of Huma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496447
Bug ID: 1496447
Summary: perl-Search-Xapian-1.2.25.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Search-Xapian
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
Hello everyone,
I'm a research student pursuing my Masters in IIIT-Hyderabad. I am keen on
working on the 389 Directory Server project for Outreachy.
I have prior experience in configuring, maintaining and managing systems in
an MHRD(Ministry of Human Resource Development, India) funded project.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496272
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48085
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/2e205ae74cad722f0ffed668b306fb8bdb15fd1eba5f75a564cdcf0358f91411-0001-mmrepl-state-tests.patch
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsub
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1492094
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.24.3-389.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2008fdd7e2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
From 37360c702b50fae165b3195388b4fce7a66bc281 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Sep 27 2017 08:34:59 +
Subject: Rebuild against Perl 5.24.3
---
diff --git a/perl-PAR-Packer.spec b/perl-PAR-Packer.spec
index edf7f9f..3ba9259 100644
--- a/perl-PAR-Packer.spec
+++ b/perl-PA
From 510ce6a7ce5e16e951dd0b4ba2228d96155d3c3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Sep 27 2017 08:27:53 +
Subject: Rebuild against Perl 5.24.3
---
diff --git a/perl-PAR-Packer.spec b/perl-PAR-Packer.spec
index 7d8e82e..e47708d 100644
--- a/perl-PAR-Packer.spec
+++ b/perl-PA
From c34790516b1912072245815831aa6cc69e981a34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Sep 27 2017 08:12:28 +
Subject: Rebuild for Perl 5.26.1
---
diff --git a/perl-PAR-Packer.spec b/perl-PAR-Packer.spec
index 7c8b600..287eae9 100644
--- a/perl-PAR-Packer.spec
+++ b/perl-PAR-Pa
From c34790516b1912072245815831aa6cc69e981a34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Sep 27 2017 08:12:28 +
Subject: Rebuild for Perl 5.26.1
---
diff --git a/perl-PAR-Packer.spec b/perl-PAR-Packer.spec
index 7c8b600..287eae9 100644
--- a/perl-PAR-Packer.spec
+++ b/perl-PAR-Pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494883
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
From 58f194f48080864e850f40be81e34ac601d4ad1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Písař
Date: Sep 25 2017 11:45:04 +
Subject: 0.035 bump
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index a087659..d2efb2e 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -19,3 +19,4 @@
/MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494883
Bug 1494883 depends on bug 1495257, which changed state.
Bug 1495257 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Util - Moose::Util extensions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1495257
What|Removed |Added
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496272
--- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova ---
I look at man page and there is mention "-Wformat is enabled by -Wall."
-Wall is included in ccflags.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
/*Jason L Tibbitts Iii*/ wrote on Tue, 26 Sep 2017 22:49:18 -0500:
"HV" == Hedayat Vatankhah writes:
HV> I'd say to stick with upstream naming, which is the Fedora
HV> way. Changing the names to lower case is a must in Debian, they
HV> simply don't allow upper case letters to be in package nam
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494826
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20170923-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Q
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1495026
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Fetch-0.54-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493797
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.38-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494820
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.38-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:U
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1492094
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.24.3-395.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1492094
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-5.24.3-388.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494826
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-CoreList-5.20170923-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Q
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1495026
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Fetch-0.54-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_T
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493804
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494820
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.38-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:U
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493797
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedo
46 matches
Mail list logo
