On 09/20/2017 10:16 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
I just ran:
koji untag-pkg f28-pending k3d-0.8.0.6-9.fc28; koji tag-pkg
f28-pending k3d-0.8.0.6-9.fc28
>> and you'll see now it's tagged into f28
Thanks, this seems to have done it.
Though *-9.fc28 doesn't seem to have landed in rawhide, I see i
Sparkleshare package is currently behind upstream which just reach 2.0[1][2]
The maintainer was contacted for updating the package with current broken
dependency below on Fedora 27 and above:
Problem: package sparkleshare-1.2.0-8.fc26.x86_64 requires mono(webkit-sharp)
= 1.1.15.0, but none of t
On 09/20/2017 10:16 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
There was a signing issue. This is seen by the fact it was tagged into
f28-pending. There's a few reasons this might happen, and depending on
what it is the quickest way for anyone to fix this themselves is to
try and untag/retag it to -pending and i
On ma, 11 syys 2017, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi folks! Time for an update on the Fedora 27 Beta status.
tl;dr action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489164
ACTION: QA to test and karma update:
https://bodhi.fedorap
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:42:16PM +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> Hello all,
Hi,
>
> I have been contributing to Fedora by helping the infrastructure team mostly
> on development tasks ( pagure, bodhi, pagure-importer, etc). I recently
> volunteer to give some love to fedora-packages[0].
Nice
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Workstation live i386
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 16/128 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20170919.n.0):
ID: 145146 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 08:09:02AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> If this is causing problem, I can easily revert and bring it back at/after
> beta.
Doesn't look like a problem, thanks anyway!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
> On 20 September 2017 at 07:37, Christian Stadelmann
>
> is "gsettings get org.gnome.software show-upgrade-prerelease" set to true?
Yes, it is. Thanks for the hint!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email t
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For ca. 3 weeks (or more) buildsys nags me with warning mails on k3d:
> ...
> k3d has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> On x86_64:
> k3d-0.8.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64 requires libMagick++-7.Q16HDRI.so.3()(64bit)
> ...
>
> Due t
On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 21:05 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 12:04 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > For ca. 3 weeks (or more) buildsys nags me with warning mails on
> > k3d:
> > ...
> > k3d has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> > On x86_64:
> > k3d-0.8.0
On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 12:04 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For ca. 3 weeks (or more) buildsys nags me with warning mails on k3d:
> ...
> k3d has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> On x86_64:
> k3d-0.8.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64 requires libMagick++-
> 7.Q16HDRI.so.3()(64bit)
> ...
>
>
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:04:13PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For ca. 3 weeks (or more) buildsys nags me with warning mails on k3d:
> ...
> k3d has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> On x86_64:
> k3d-0.8.0.6-8.fc28.x86_64 requires libMagick++-7.Q16HDRI.so.3()(64bit)
> ...
>
Hello all,
I have been contributing to Fedora by helping the infrastructure team mostly on
development tasks ( pagure, bodhi, pagure-importer, etc). I recently volunteer
to give some love to fedora-packages[0].
That brings me here since I would like to move fedora-packages from rhel6 to
rhel7,
Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 23/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170919.n.0):
ID: 144972 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.f
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Beta release Go/No-Go Meeting on 2017-09-21 from 17:00:00 to 19:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to
determine if the re
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2017-09-20 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Wednesday =
2017-09-20 10:00 PDT US/Pacific
2017-09-20 1
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 04:33:13PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> You can change the anitya integration by opening a pull-request on
> https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests
> As you can see in the git repo there are files for each container/modules/rpm
> having a specific setting.
> You
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:57:02AM +0200, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
> python-lxml -- XML processing library combining libxml2/libxslt with the
Actually, someone already requested to adopt this package :)
--
Athos Ribeiro
http://www.ime.usp.br/~athoscr
__
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:57:02AM +0200, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've been tried for the past 1+ year to be active on the Fedora Project
> throught packaging and in other ways, even if my daily job is absorbing a
> big part of my energies and time. Also, lately, even mor
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 08:04:53PM +0800, Zamir Sun wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Jaroslav Skarvada
> wrote:
> > How to change upstream release monitoring, i.e. how to
> > switch the states between disabled, monitoring, and
> > monitoring with build? I didn't find anything related in
Hi,
I have a set of spec files that perfom the same operations on file lists.
They are bittrotting fast with each spec differing slightly from the other
I'd like to consolidate the operations in a common macro to have a single place
to tweak/fix.
So basically I want something like
%mymacro -f
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Alexandre Moine wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Short version: I am leaving from fedora to archlinux.
Thanks for everything you've done for Fedora!
> * hyperrogue -- An SDL roguelike in a non-euclidean world ( master f26
> f25 f24 )
I believe I reviewed this; I'd be happy
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/48085
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/08b0f0d9664c6994483dda55c4b79a7733768113505bd71ca77df930a6f421e9-0001-Replication-ruvstore-tests.patch
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Thanks for all your hard work Fabio,
I can take over python-boto3, qbittorrent and rb_libtorrent if noone wants
those.
Regards,
Charalampos Stratakis
Software Engineer
Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat
- Original Message -
From: "Fabio Alessandro Locati"
To: "Development discussions r
2017-09-19 21:44 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Moine :
> Hi all,
>
> Short version: I am leaving from fedora to archlinux.
>
> Long version: I really want to thank ALL of the fedora community, which
> was more than friends. You have been in fact great teachers for me, when
> I started to contribute the 19/11
On 20 September 2017 at 08:57, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
[..]
> Those are the list of packages I just orphanated:
>
>
> 2ping -- Bi-directional ping utility
> ioping -- Simple disk I/O latency monitoring tool
> libnatpmp -- Library of The NAT Port Mapping Protocol
> lzma -- LZMA utils
> mcabb
On 16/09/17 11:37 +, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Now I get daily, angry automated e-mails that tell me to fix my sh!t ASAP
because of broken deps in the F27 tree.
You can ignore them. The script that generates those emails isn't
angry, and the problem will resolve itself once the updates are pus
Thank you for all you work, Fabio.
I can take over feh. I'll file a pagure ticket for adopting the package.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 08:09:02AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 20 September 2017 at 07:37, Christian Stadelmann
> wrote:
> > Is this a bug, or is this expected to happen? Shouldn't this happen only
> > after F27 has reached beta?
>
> is "gsettings get org.gnome.software show-upgrade-prerel
Hi everyone,
I've been tried for the past 1+ year to be active on the Fedora Project
throught packaging and in other ways, even if my daily job is absorbing a
big part of my energies and time. Also, lately, even more things are
absorbing my energy and time.
Clearly this is not working very well,
On 20 September 2017 at 07:37, Christian Stadelmann
wrote:
> Is this a bug, or is this expected to happen? Shouldn't this happen only
> after F27 has reached beta?
is "gsettings get org.gnome.software show-upgrade-prerelease" set to true?
Richard.
___
31 matches
Mail list logo
