Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Workstation live i386
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 19/128 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170907.n.0):
ID: 139524 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso de
On 17-09-13 14:10:06, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On 09/09/2017 09:48 AM, Tony Nelson wrote:
> Could someone apply the patch in this bug[1], languishing since
2013?
> According to "freedesktop.org Bug 61998 - Fails to read status from
> WD raptors"[2] the patch is in Debian/Ubuntu. Lennart Poettering
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Workstation live i386
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 24/137 (x86_64), 2/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20170912.n.0):
ID: 141737 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Workstation live i386
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 23/128 (x86_64), 2/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20170912.n.0):
ID: 141444 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_s
On 09/09/2017 12:48 PM, Tony Nelson wrote:
Could someone apply the patch in this bug[1], languishing since 2013?
According to "freedesktop.org Bug 61998 - Fails to read status from
WD raptors"[2] the patch is in Debian/Ubuntu. Lennart Poettering did
the last upstream[3] commit 7 years ago, but s
According to the Change for F27 [0], all golang packages have been rebuilt
against golang 1.9beta2. In the meantime, go 1.9 stable has been released
upstream (Aug. 24, 2017) [1].
I suspect that some of the issues I am having with go / my golang packages
in fedora would be fixed by the update to th
Hello, Richard, and sorry for the late reply.
I've patched the Lazarus project file and got the package to compile
successfully (koji scratch build) on i686. I attach the patch below. Hope
you'll find it useful.
--- cqrlog-2.0.5/src/cqrlog.lpi 2017-03-12 21:09:12.0 +0100
+++ patched/src
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 16:11 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Unfortunately I don't have time to follow many of Fedora
>> related activities. AFAIK freezes in f27 changed.
>
> Not really, the only change is that there was no Alpha rel
On 09/09/2017 09:48 AM, Tony Nelson wrote:
> Could someone apply the patch in this bug[1], languishing since 2013?
> According to "freedesktop.org Bug 61998 - Fails to read status from
> WD raptors"[2] the patch is in Debian/Ubuntu. Lennart Poettering did
> the last upstream[3] commit 7 years ago,
On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 16:11 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hello,
> Unfortunately I don't have time to follow many of Fedora
> related activities. AFAIK freezes in f27 changed.
Not really, the only change is that there was no Alpha release for F27.
> First are we in freeze time ? until when ?
Un
Hello,
Unfortunately I don't have time to follow many of Fedora
related activities. AFAIK freezes in f27 changed.
First are we in freeze time ? until when ?
May you announce when we enter in freeze time. And the date of last
push before start freezing ? and when we may update f27 branch again
? i
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Beta Release Readiness Meeting on 2017-09-14 from 15:00:00 to 17:00:00
US/Eastern
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
We will meet to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the Beta release of
Fedora 25 on Tu
On Tue, 2017-09-12 at 16:34 +, Samuel Rakitničan wrote:
> > X Error: BadAccess (attempt to access private resource denied) 10
> > Extension:130 (MIT-SHM)
> > Minor opcode: 1 (X_ShmAttach)
> > Resource id: 0x131
> > X Error: BadShmSeg (invalid shared segment parameter) 128
> > Exte
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Beta release Go/No-Go Meeting on 2017-09-14 from 13:00:00 to 15:00:00
US/Eastern
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to
determine if the rel
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 07:22:04AM -0400, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I can take the python-* packages.
...
> rpms/python-bunch
> rpms/python-protocols
> rpms/python-unicodenazi
> rpms/python-virtualenvwrapper
All four are now yours :)
Thanks!
Pierre
___
2017-09-12 17:35 GMT+02:00 Ben Williams :
> hello
>
> This is an issue i am seeing with new users:
>
> I was at a University installfest this weekend and this was the major issues
> for Endusers.
>
> case A) Students are using Fedora on windows in a VM (Vbox in this case) for
> a class. they are re
Hello,
I can take the python-* packages.
Regards,
Charalampos Stratakis
Software Engineer
Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat
- Original Message -
From: "Pierre-Yves Chibon"
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 12:52:40 PM
Subject: Main adm
D'Oh, shame on me. I didnt' realized, that the message came from F27 tree
*facepalm*.
Thanks.
2017-09-13 11:56 GMT+02:00 Lubomír Sedlář :
> Hello,
> it looks like you only rebuilt it for Rawhide (in master branch). The
> report mentions F 27, and the latest package there includes ppc64 arch.
> D
Good Morning Everyone,
I recently found out that some packages were not correctly migrated from pkgdb
Looking at a couple of ones in pkgdb, it seem the issue is basically that a
group
has commit access to the package but no-one has commit or approveacls so during
the migration, the script was no
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 6:10 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Deprecate TCP wrappers =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Deprecate_TCP_wrappers
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Jakub Jelen
>
> TCP wrappers is a simple tool to block incoming connection on
> application level. T
= Proposed System Wide Change: Deprecate TCP wrappers =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Deprecate_TCP_wrappers
Change owner(s):
* Jakub Jelen
TCP wrappers is a simple tool to block incoming connection on
application level. This was very useful 20 years ago, when there were
no firewalls in
Hello,
it looks like you only rebuilt it for Rawhide (in master branch). The
report mentions F 27, and the latest package there includes ppc64 arch.
Doing a similar rebuild in f27 branch should fix things.
Lubomír
Jakub Jedelsky píše v St 13. 09. 2017 v 10:39 +0200:
> Hi there,
>
> I received the
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Robert-André Mauchin
wrote:
> With this patch, scidavis sucessfully builds on ARM: https://
> koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21837152
Wow, thanks a lot Robert-André!
I will send the patch upstream ASAP.
All the best
Alex
Hi there,
I received the message below. I updated the package, so the
new version is not builded for ppc64 arch already [1] (I hope). I guess the
problem is, that the older version is still there for the arch. Is it
possible to drop it from the repo somehow?
Thanks,
- jj.
[1]
https://src.fedor
On mardi 12 septembre 2017 21:51:45 CEST Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a package under review[0], that I realized had python scripting
> support disabled, so I enabled it. Before that, it built fine in
> rawhide on all arches[1].
>
> After enabling it (which involves python obvi
I'm planning to build gpsd-3.17 in rawhide the next week. It bumps the
soname of libgps. It seems the API was just extended, so I don't
expect any problems with rebuilding the client applications.
If my repoquery command was correct, the following packages will need
to be rebuilt:
collectd-5.7.2-
On 13/09/17 04:39 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:54:24PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 12/09/17 18:41 -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
>On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
>>>Was this package rename discussed anywhere?
>>>
>>>I don't thin
27 matches
Mail list logo
