[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2017-09-11 Fedora QA Meeting (and blocker review meeting)

2017-09-10 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow. There's nothing urgent to discuss that I'm aware of, and the focus for this coming week will likely be Beta validation testing. There *will* be a blocker review meeting at 1600 in #fedora-blocker-review, so please come along to that if you

Re: A less "bloated" KDE spin

2017-09-10 Thread Globe Trotter
Very good point. I think that the original poster meant "not needed" by him but it is good to be precise. I do not use KDE because of the bload that I consider to be KDE, and so have been amused by this thread. I guess the OP and his friends could create a KDE-Lite spin or try LXQT (which I also

Re: A less "bloated" KDE spin

2017-09-10 Thread Gerald Henriksen
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 23:34:10 +0200, you wrote: >+1 for making the KDE spin lighter. >I'm really surprised with all the advocates here. Isn't it the right way to >go, to always have as minimal install as possible, with just the basics for >the purpose? I truly believe that everyone grabs KDE spin f

Re: A less "bloated" KDE spin

2017-09-10 Thread Matthew Miller
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 11:34:10PM +0200, Radka Janekova wrote: > Yes, I've installed it and removed about a *gigabyte* of trash. I believe > that most people will use maybe one or two tools out of that list. Hey, let's please not call software in Fedora "trash", regardless of personal opinion of

Re: A less "bloated" KDE spin

2017-09-10 Thread Radka Janekova
+1 for making the KDE spin lighter. I'm really surprised with all the advocates here. Isn't it the right way to go, to always have as minimal install as possible, with just the basics for the purpose? I truly believe that everyone grabs KDE spin for the Plasma desktop, for the environment, and not

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-10 Thread David Sommerseth
On 07/09/17 14:25, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Sunday, 03 September 2017 at 13:45, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> GnuPG 2.2.0 has --enable-gpg-is-gpg2 which would install compat symlink >> from /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2.. >> >> Is it time to retire gnupg (v1) ? > > hplip still require

Fedora 27-20170910.n.0 compose check report

2017-09-10 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 41/128 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20170907.n.0): ID: 139960 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject

Fedora Rawhide-20170910.n.0 compose check report

2017-09-10 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Workstation live i386 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 21/128 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170909.n.0): ID: 139803 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-10 Thread Michael J Gruber
Till Maas venit, vidit, dixit 04.09.2017 18:24: > On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 08:56:31AM +0200, Remi Collet wrote: > >> gnupg v2 is a nightmare for "server", I maintain some PHP extensions and >> libraries which works perfectly against v1, and not against v2 > > Would it be ok for you to patch the li

Re: A less "bloated" KDE spin

2017-09-10 Thread jack smith
Anyway MPV is only in RPM Fusion so can't be included in the ISO. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: A less "bloated" KDE spin

2017-09-10 Thread jack smith
Thanks but I'm perfectly happy with KDE :) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org