On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 15:25 -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On 09/07/2017 09:14 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> > It works with the browser indeed. Would it work with command line
> > tools
> > like bodhi as well?
>
> The currently implementation of the Bodhi CLI subclasses
> fedora.client.OpenI
On 09/07/2017 09:14 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> It works with the browser indeed. Would it work with command line tools
> like bodhi as well?
The currently implementation of the Bodhi CLI subclasses
fedora.client.OpenIdBaseClient, which does not support kerberos:
https://github.com/fedor
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 21:50:15 +0300
Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> The per-symbol API versioning in RPM was proposed five years ago by
> ALT Linux people. It actually works well in their RPM fork.
>
> An isolated version of that code is available at
> https://github.com/svpv/rpmss
>
> You may want to
On 09/06/2017 08:25 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> * To submit a changed package: bodhi: raw passwords
> * To subscribe to a mailing list: lists.fedoraproject.org: openid?
A minor correction here: Bodhi also uses OpenID.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
Hi folks! It's that time again when I ask for folks to test updates
that fix F27 blocker and freeze exception bugs, and provide karma
(feedback) in Bodhi. Here are some updates that could use feedback:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-edf1be580e -
selinux-policy update, just ins
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Workstation live i386
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Server boot i386
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 47/137 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170906.n.1):
ID: 138642 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso
On to, 07 syys 2017, stan wrote:
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 13:27:18 +0200
Jan Pazdziora wrote:
Yes, it might become a mess if the tooling is not right or clear. But
it is also an opportunity to potentially get a choice between stay on
the old, stable, vs. get the latest greatest.
But it seems to be
On Thu, 7 Sep 2017 13:27:18 +0200
Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> Yes, it might become a mess if the tooling is not right or clear. But
> it is also an opportunity to potentially get a choice between stay on
> the old, stable, vs. get the latest greatest.
But it seems to be the wrong way to do this; tryi
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for the Fedora 27
Beta Release Readiness Meeting meeting.
The meeting is going to be held on Thursday, Sep 14, 2017 at 19:00
UTC. Please check the [1] link for your time zone.
We will meet to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the Beta
rele
On 17-09-07 09:47:36, Globe Trotter wrote:
Hello,
I posted this on the F26 mailing list but the issue may be deeper
requiring some more knowledge from the developers so I thought that I
would also put it here.
There is a bug report on this here:
Bug 1470354 – dillo appears to not have been
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2017-09-08 16:00 UTC'
Links to all issues below ca
Hello,
I posted this on the F26 mailing list but the issue may be deeper requiring
some more knowledge from the developers so I thought that I would also put it
here.
There is a bug report on this here:
Bug 1470354 – dillo appears to not have been compiled with ssl in F26
|
| |
Bug 147
On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 09:51 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 09/06/2017 05:25 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> > Hi,
> > What's the story between the recently introduced support of
> > kerberos
> > in koji? My understanding was that eventually all services of
> > fedora
> > would switch to kerbe
On Sunday, 03 September 2017 at 13:45, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> GnuPG 2.2.0 has --enable-gpg-is-gpg2 which would install compat symlink
> from /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2..
>
> Is it time to retire gnupg (v1) ?
hplip still requires gnupg.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://getfedora.org |
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 01:06:21PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > Ok, I agree that Fedora needs modules for life-cycle separation.
>
> I don't. I consider what you call "life-cycle separation" (I'd rather call
> it "inconsistent EOLs") a bug rather than a feature.
>
> This
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 27
Beta.
The meeting is going to be held on Thursday, Sep 14, 2017 at 17:00
UTC. Please check the [1] link for your time zone.
Before each public release Development
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 08:38:57PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Nearly done it. Unfortunately I updated ‘why’ to the latest upstream
> > version (the previous one didn't know about OCaml 4.05), however that
> > will require updating ‘fr
17 matches
Mail list logo
