Re: OCaml / aarch64 / binutils / coq mess

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Nearly done it. Unfortunately I updated ‘why’ to the latest upstream > version (the previous one didn't know about OCaml 4.05), however that > will require updating ‘frama-c’: > > configure: WARNING: bad Frama-c version "Silicon-201611

Re: story of kerberos

On Wed, 06 Sep 2017, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On 09/06/2017 10:05 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 09:51 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: So, they are all tied together via ipsilon (except ssh keys, and wiki login). Once we have a concrete plan for ssh we will be happy to share it. Would you

Re: story of kerberos

On 09/06/2017 01:37 PM, Ben Rosser wrote: > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On 09/06/2017 05:25 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: >>> Hi, >>> What's the story between the recently introduced support of kerberos >>> in koji? My understanding was that eventually all services

Re: story of kerberos

On 09/06/2017 10:05 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 09:51 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> So, they are all tied together via ipsilon (except ssh keys, and wiki >> login). >> >> Once we have a concrete plan for ssh we will be happy to share it. > > Would you consider allowing SSH+GSSA

Re: Should a binary allowed to self-update ?

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:01 PM, DAVID Clément wrote: > Dear packagers, > > On my road to package http://exercism.io CLI, I need to provide a > self-update feature [1] for Golang-coded binaries. After a look at the > packaging guidelines, I am not sure if it is allowed to package binaries > with su

Should a binary allowed to self-update ?

Dear packagers, On my road to package http://exercism.io CLI, I need to provide a self-update feature [1] for Golang-coded binaries. After a look at the packaging guidelines, I am not sure if it is allowed to package binaries with such a feature. To me, it should be discarded as the rpm provided b

Re: story of kerberos

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 09/06/2017 05:25 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: >> Hi, >> What's the story between the recently introduced support of kerberos >> in koji? My understanding was that eventually all services of fedora >> would switch to kerberos authentic

Need review for f27-backgrounds

Design team recently completed the beta wallpapers and the package is ready for review. The spec is very straightforward and needs for the beta release. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489160 -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coo

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 11:12:14AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 09:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 10:51 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > > On 09/06/2017 10:23 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > Is there a fix for this? > > > > > > ImageM

Re: OCaml / aarch64 / binutils / coq mess

Nearly done it. Unfortunately I updated ‘why’ to the latest upstream version (the previous one didn't know about OCaml 4.05), however that will require updating ‘frama-c’: configure: WARNING: bad Frama-c version "Silicon-20161101", you need version Phosphorus At that point I stopped. Would y

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

On 2017-09-06 13:16, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 14:02 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: >> On 09/06/2017 01:22 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: >>> [tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ grep filetrigger * | grep icons >>> adwaita-icon-theme.spec:%transfiletriggerin -- >>> %{_datadir}/icons/Adwaita >

Re: Confusing SCM package request

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 13:14 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> Taking your follow up of "folks doing the SCM requests" into account, >> I don't think that's what they signed up for? That's the job of a >> sponsor. >> >> However, you're just making

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

Kalev Lember wrote: > I > can add the triggers to KDE and other themes as well if their > maintainers are fine with it. rdieter? If you don't mind, please do, thanks. -- Rex ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On 6 September 2017 at 03:16, Rex Dieter wrote: > [..] >>> It would be good to start remove on this cycle execution of all >>> glib-compile-schemas, gtk-update-icon-cache and >>> update-desktop-database from all %post/%postun as all necessary >>> changes are done over rpm

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 14:02 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 09/06/2017 01:22 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > > [tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ grep filetrigger * | grep icons > > adwaita-icon-theme.spec:%transfiletriggerin -- > > %{_datadir}/icons/Adwaita > > adwaita-icon-theme.spec:%transfiletriggerpos

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 09:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 10:51 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > On 09/06/2017 10:23 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > Is there a fix for this? > > > > ImageMagick was downgraded from v7 to v6 today. A emacs rebuild will fix > > it. I

Re: Confusing SCM package request

On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 13:14 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > Taking your follow up of "folks doing the SCM requests" into account, > I don't think that's what they signed up for? That's the job of a > sponsor. > > However, you're just making cases for the easy to catch things and > didn't address my po

Fedora Rawhide-20170906.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Workstation live i386 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 47/137 (x86_64), 1/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170903.n.0): ID: 137942 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso

Re: Confusing SCM package request

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 12:26 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> What you're catching by doing this forced delay is >> rushed reviews or laziness on the part of two people. > > Also *ignorance*, in the case of legally-not-allowed things. And it We

Re: story of kerberos

On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 09:51 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > So, they are all tied together via ipsilon (except ssh keys, and wiki > login). > > Once we have a concrete plan for ssh we will be happy to share it. Would you consider allowing SSH+GSSAPI as well ? This way I do not need to care for keys

Re: Confusing SCM package request

On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 09:53 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 12:26 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > What you're catching by doing this forced delay is > > rushed reviews or laziness on the part of two people. > > Also *ignorance*, in the case of legally-not-allowed things. And it

Re: Confusing SCM package request

On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 12:26 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > What you're catching by doing this forced delay is > rushed reviews or laziness on the part of two people. Also *ignorance*, in the case of legally-not-allowed things. And it also allows the folks doing the package reviews to look for patterns

Re: story of kerberos

On 09/06/2017 05:25 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > Hi, > What's the story between the recently introduced support of kerberos > in koji? My understanding was that eventually all services of fedora > would switch to kerberos authentication, though information on the > following bugs for bodhi

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 10:51 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 09/06/2017 10:23 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Is there a fix for this? > > ImageMagick was downgraded from v7 to v6 today. A emacs rebuild will fix it. > I've > submitted one. I am doing the rebuilds. Unfortunately, the f28

Re: Confusing SCM package request

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 09/02/2017 07:09 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 07:48:47AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser >>> wrote: Am 29.08.2017 um 11:30 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: >>>

Re: Confusing SCM package request

On 09/02/2017 07:09 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 07:48:47AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser >> wrote: >>> Am 29.08.2017 um 11:30 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: I'm trying to import this package into Fedora:

story of kerberos

Hi, What's the story between the recently introduced support of kerberos in koji? My understanding was that eventually all services of fedora would switch to kerberos authentication, though information on the following bugs for bodhi seems to contradict that: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.

what's the story with kerberos

-- Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, PhD, Crypto Tech. Lead, Security Technologies, Red Hat, Inc. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

On 09/06/2017 10:23 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Is there a fix for this? ImageMagick was downgraded from v7 to v6 today. A emacs rebuild will fix it. I've submitted one. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send a

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

On 6 September 2017 at 13:02, Kalev Lember wrote: [..] > > Seems like packages installing other themes *already* are doing exactly > > what I've been thinking that they should be doing so updating per icon > > theme strategy should be OK. > > Right, I added file triggers to all gnome-related icon

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

I only skimmed this thread and didn't see any reference to this. Currently emacs is uninstallable in Rawhide, resulting in any Koji build that depends on emacs failing: DEBUG util.py:439:- nothing provides libMagickCore-7.Q16HDRI.so.3()(64bit) needed by emacs-1:25.2-9.fc28.x86_64 Is ther

Re: OCaml / aarch64 / binutils / coq mess

I believe I have come up with a patch which works well enough that we can push it to Fedora 27+ aarch64: https://pagure.io/fedora-ocaml/c/e7fdaf008e047c445fd7a6acf9362d8b5940bf4b?branch=fedora-27-4.05.0 Note this patch is not upstream but I've brought it to the attention of the upstream mainta

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

On 09/06/2017 01:22 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > [tkloczko@domek SPECS.fedora]$ grep filetrigger * | grep icons > adwaita-icon-theme.spec:%transfiletriggerin -- %{_datadir}/icons/Adwaita > adwaita-icon-theme.spec:%transfiletriggerpostun -- %{_datadir}/icons/Adwaita > gnome-icon-theme.spec:%transfile

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 27 Beta Freeze

Dne 6.9.2017 v 12:39 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a): > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 12:17 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 5.9.2017 v 16:28 Mohan Boddu napsal(a): > >> Hi all,   > >> Today is an important day on the Fedora 27 schedule[1], with two > >>  significant cut-offs.   > >> Today is the Beta freeze[

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

On 6 September 2017 at 09:32, Neal Gompa wrote: [..] > I think we implemented file triggers in Mageia for this, I'll need to > do some checking. I know that we're pretty aggressive on package, > transaction, and file trigger usage compared to Fedora... Heck, we > don't even need ldconfig runs in M

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

On 6 September 2017 at 11:43, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: [..] > 3) As long as hicolor theme is default theme updating its cache can > still be in gtk-update-icon-cache package. > > What happens with other directories than /usr/share/icons/hicolor is > in this case secondary and can be treated as an ex

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

On 6 September 2017 at 09:24, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: [..] > That is NOT true for gtk-update-icon-cache. There is currently no trigger > for it, at least when I look at the recent information on the wiki [1]. OK. Just started working on add this (I see a lot other things which can be impro

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 27 Beta Freeze

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 12:17 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 5.9.2017 v 16:28 Mohan Boddu napsal(a): > > Hi all, > > Today is an important day on the Fedora 27 schedule[1], with two > > significant cut-offs. > > Today is the Beta freeze[2]. Th

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 27 Beta Freeze

Dne 5.9.2017 v 16:28 Mohan Boddu napsal(a): > Hi all,   > Today is an important day on the Fedora 27 schedule[1], with two >  significant cut-offs.   > Today is the Beta freeze[2]. This means that only packages which fix > accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs[3][4] will be marked as > 'stabl

Re: Providing ABI/API assurances for the base runtime in Fedora.

On 2017-09-06, Petr Pisar wrote: > Does it mean that when a need for a new feature arises, e.g. adding > getrandom(3) into glibc > we will produce > a new platform stream distinct from the GA stream? > I will answer to myself: Yes, we will beca

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:24 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am 06.09.2017 um 09:51 schrieb Tomasz Kłoczko: >> >> On 6 September 2017 at 03:16, Rex Dieter wrote: >> [..] It would be good to start remove on this cycle execution of all glib-compile-schemas, gtk-update-icon-cache a

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

Am 06.09.2017 um 09:51 schrieb Tomasz Kłoczko: On 6 September 2017 at 03:16, Rex Dieter wrote: [..] It would be good to start remove on this cycle execution of all glib-compile-schemas, gtk-update-icon-cache and update-desktop-database from all %post/%postun as all necessary changes are done o

Re: GNOME 3.25.92 megaupdate

On 6 September 2017 at 03:16, Rex Dieter wrote: [..] >> It would be good to start remove on this cycle execution of all >> glib-compile-schemas, gtk-update-icon-cache and >> update-desktop-database from all %post/%postun as all necessary >> changes are done over rpm triggers. >> All this stuff on

Re: Providing ABI/API assurances for the base runtime in Fedora.

On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 08:57:24AM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 09/04/2017 07:31 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > > What if there is a bug in the behavior of the frozen base-* packages? Do > > we have to live with the bug for the rest of the life time of the base > > (=platform)? Or do we break this r

[Test-Announce] Fedora 27 Beta Freeze

Hi all, Today is an important day on the Fedora 27 schedule[1], with two significant cut-offs. Today is the Beta freeze[2]. This means that only packages which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs[3][4] will be marked as 'stable' and included in the Beta composes. Other builds will rema