Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-03 Thread Remi Collet
Le 03/09/2017 à 13:45, Igor Gnatenko a écrit : > GnuPG 2.2.0 has --enable-gpg-is-gpg2 which would install compat symlink > from /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2.. > > Is it time to retire gnupg (v1) ? -1 gnupg v2 is a nightmare for "server", I maintain some PHP extensions and libraries which works

Re: [DONE] Mass package change (python2- binary package renaming)

2017-09-03 Thread Jan Beran
Hi Zbyszek, > ... > python-djvulibre-0.3.9-11.fc28error: invalid application of > 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'enum ddjvu_status_e' You can use a new spec that updates to 0.8 version including Python 3 subpackage [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312327]. Best regards

Fedora 27-20170903.n.0 compose check report

2017-09-03 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 47/128 (x86_64), 2/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20170902.n.0): ID: 137149 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/te

[Test-Announce] 2017-09-04 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2017-09-03 Thread Adam Williamson
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2017-09-04 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's time for another meeting! Let's check in on F27, and a couple of new ideas... If anyone has any

Re: Confusing SCM package request

2017-09-03 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 07:48:47AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Björn 'besser82' Esser > wrote: > > Am 29.08.2017 um 11:30 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > >> > >> I'm trying to import this package into Fedora: > >> > >>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=11

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-03 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Please see the thread from a year or so ago (The last time this came up): https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/LK4OC43LQROZV7NKXADBD3B2BKABOXOD/#LK4OC43LQROZV7NKXADBD3B2BKABOXOD Basically at that time the gnupg1 maintainer said it's still supported up

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-03 Thread Christopher
+1 On Sun, Sep 3, 2017, 07:57 Igor Gnatenko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > GnuPG 2.2.0 has --enable-gpg-is-gpg2 which would install compat symlink > from /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2.. > > Is it time to retire gnupg (v1) ? > - -- > - -Igor Gnatenko > -BEGIN

Re: X86 meeting 1900 UTC 2017-09-06

2017-09-03 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
My apologies. I put in the wrong month. It will be September 6, 2017. On 2 September 2017 at 15:57, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > There will be a meeting in #fedora-meeting-2 on 1900 UTC (1500 EDT for > US timezones) to go over the setup of the x86 group > > #startmeeting x86 > #meetingname x86 >

Fedora Rawhide-20170903.n.0 compose check report

2017-09-03 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 49/137 (x86_64), 2/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20170902.n.0): ID: 136940 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

2017-09-03 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 14:10 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On Sep 2, 2017 11:36 AM, Adam Williamson > wrote: > So I'm gonna start working on the 6.9.9 downgrade in F27, and I'm  > tempted to just downgrade Rawhide at the same time, and if we > actually  > do decide to try 7 again, we can star

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-03 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 02:24:22PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am 03.09.2017 um 13:45 schrieb Igor Gnatenko: > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >Hash: SHA256 > > > >GnuPG 2.2.0 has --enable-gpg-is-gpg2 which would install compat symlink > > from /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2.. > >

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-03 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > GnuPG 2.2.0 has --enable-gpg-is-gpg2 which would install compat symlink > from /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2.. > > Is it time to retire gnupg (v1) ? IIRC, we've been doing this in Fedora

Re: GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-03 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Am 03.09.2017 um 13:45 schrieb Igor Gnatenko: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 GnuPG 2.2.0 has --enable-gpg-is-gpg2 which would install compat symlink from /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2.. Is it time to retire gnupg (v1) ? - -- - -Igor Gnatenko Well, if %{_bindir}/gpg2 is gua

GnuPG 2.2.0 and replacement of GnuPG1

2017-09-03 Thread Igor Gnatenko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 GnuPG 2.2.0 has --enable-gpg-is-gpg2 which would install compat symlink from /usr/bin/gpg to /usr/bin/gpg2.. Is it time to retire gnupg (v1) ? - -- - -Igor Gnatenko -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlmr62Q

Re: Urgent attention required; ImageMagick update breakage

2017-09-03 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 09/02/2017 12:14 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: On 09/01/2017 01:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: FESCo decided at today's meeting that 7 should not go to F27 (unless it can be made parallel installable and not used by anything release- blocking by default), and to go into F28 there must be a sy