Greetings, all!
The elections for Council - July/August 2017 have concluded, and the
results are shown below.
Council is electing 1 seat this time. A total of 178 ballots were
cast, meaning a candidate could accumulate up to 890 votes (178 * 5).
The results for the elections are as follows:
#
Hi Fedora community,
as the originally planned FAmSCo and FESCo Voting period was
cancelled, we are now starting the alternative Voting period to these
two teams. Please vote for your candidates to FAmSCo [1] and FESCo
[2].
You can vote till August 21th, 2017 when the voting ends at 23:59:00 UTC.
Hi folks!
Just wanted to give a heads-up on this: it seems that a recent selinux-
policy update, 3.13.1-269 , introduced a new permission called 'map'.
This seems to have resulted in rather a large amount of new SELinux
denials for this permission in various cases. Some are fairly serious -
e.g. t
On Monday, 14 August 2017 at 02:35, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > It also needs some patching, because each library has a different
> > SONAME.
>
> Symlinking
> libblas.so.3 → libopenblas.so.0
> liblapack.so.3 → libopenblas.so.0
> is enough to get things linked ag
According to the fedrepo doc linked from [1] I did:
$ fedrepo-req-branch preeny f26
And the ticket [2] was closed with a message:
"The branch in PDC was created. You may now create the branch in Pagure using
git."
I did:
$ git checkout -b f26
Switched to a new branch 'f26'
$ git push -u origi
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Office Hours on 2017-08-15 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern
At https://meet.jit.si/fedora-modularity
The meeting will be about:
This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to
answer them)!
Join us o
Missing expected images:
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Workstation live i386
Server boot i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde live i386
Failed openQA tests: 42/137 (x86_64), 3/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20170813.n.0):
ID: 129336 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
0 packages were orphaned
0 packages were retired
0 packages unorphaned
-
0 packages were unretired
0
how long will it take until I can push new packages again for f26 and f25 ?
[martin@f26 nuvola-app-8tracks]$ git checkout -b f26; git push --set-upstream
origin f26
Switched to a new branch 'f26'
Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
remote: FATAL: C refs/heads/f26 rpms/nuvola-app-8tracks martink
On 13/08/17 08:02 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 04:45:57AM -, Andrew Toskin wrote:
>> If you're talking specifically about the Bodhi web UI, then I think I'm
>> having the same problem: After I logged in, I clicked on Create > New
>> Update, tried to search
On 08/14/2017 06:47 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 08/14/2017 10:39 AM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> On 08/14/2017 05:26 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>> On 08/12/2017 06:08 AM, Antonio Trande wrote:
On 07/21/2017 04:51 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> rpms/suitesparse -- A collection of sparse mat
On 08/14/2017 05:26 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 08/12/2017 06:08 AM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> On 07/21/2017 04:51 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>> rpms/suitesparse -- A collection of sparse matrix libraries ( el6 )
>>
>> Let me update suitesparse on el6 too, please.
>>
>
> suitesparse is part of
How to change upstream release monitoring, i.e. how to
switch the states between disabled, monitoring, and
monitoring with build? I didn't find anything related in [1],
so I tried:
$ fedrepo-req preeny -m monitoring -t 1479022
But the request [2] was closed as invalid? What's the correct
procedu
I see that modem-manager-gui has been orphaned recently. I took a look at the
package and didn't see any build failures, so this seems just a case of the
packager dropping the pkg. I've managed to built it locally and have a scratch
koji build, without any problems. As such, I'm willing to adopt
Hi Neal,
I missed that you wrote already here as I was working on fixes for
these CVEs for RHEL. I have pushed updates for F25+ already into the dist-git
(builds are pending for testing now). Except thg, which was completely
outside of my scope.
Just info for others:
hg for F26+ is rebased to v4.2
2017-08-14 14:36 GMT+02:00 Martin Sehnoutka :
> Hello,
>
> there is a new version of Wireshark available in Fedora Rawhide (2.4.0)
> and it comes with both Qt and GTK+ GUI. Nonetheless the upstream
> developers do not support GTK version any more.
>
> https://www.wireshark.org/docs/relnotes/wiresha
Hello,
there is a new version of Wireshark available in Fedora Rawhide (2.4.0)
and it comes with both Qt and GTK+ GUI. Nonetheless the upstream
developers do not support GTK version any more.
https://www.wireshark.org/docs/relnotes/wireshark-2.4.0.html
I think it's time to drop it and use Wiresh
On 08/14/2017 02:56 PM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 08:31:12AM +0200, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Hi, just seen that sos package is starting to fail on rawhide with
following error:
Executing command: ['bash', '--login', '-c', '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb
--target noarch --nodeps /buil
On 07/20/2017 05:04 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
My workload at $dayjob$ has increased significantly so I'm afraid I have much
less time to devote to packaging work. Now more than ever I could use help
maintaining my packages (listed below). If you are interested, please add
yourself as co-mainta
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 08:31:12AM +0200, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Hi, just seen that sos package is starting to fail on rawhide with
> following error:
>
>
> Executing command: ['bash', '--login', '-c', '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb
> --target noarch --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/sos.spec'] with env
On 08/13/2017 06:24 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 08/13/2017 04:09 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 08/12/2017 06:29 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 08/10/2017 01:47 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
Resending to devel@, some mishap in earlier...
Forwarded Message
Subject: Heads-up on
Fedora community,
I need to inform you that currently running elections to FESCo needs
to be cancelled. As reported on Council ticket #131 [1], one of the
nominees to FESCo has already granted FESCo seat till end of the F27
period. As such his nomination for the current Elections needs to be
cance
22 matches
Mail list logo
