No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/135 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 26 RC 1.4):
ID: 117809 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/117809
ID: 117853 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-is
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora 26 Final Go/No-Go Meeting on 2017-07-06 from 17:00:00 to 19:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determi
On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 16:00 +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> Update is submitted:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-9d3d39fe57
Thank you for this very quick support!
Regards,
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2017-07-06 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2017-07-06 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2017-07-06 1
Hi Gwyn,
I'll take this in exchange for wordgrinder:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460246
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Gwyn Ciesla wrote:
> I just submitted python-slackclient:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467995
>
> Willing to do one of yours.
>
> Thanks!
>
Hi folks! Got another request for Fedora 26 Final testing: can folks
please try booting RC-1.4 in VMware? For me, the Workstation live fails
to boot properly, in various configurations; in comparison the F25
Final Workstation live boots fine. That worried me a bit, so it'd be
good to hear results f
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Failed openQA tests: 3/137 (x86_64), 1/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170704.n.0):
ID: 117601 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/117601
ID: 11
On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 15:04 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > So... this prompts a question in my head. I understand we don't block
> > release for non-blocking spins. That is obvious.
> >
> > What is not obvious to me is if we would go back and
On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 19:51 +, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote:
> I have gone ahead and filed a bug for this (Bug ID: 1468029) and
> proposed it as final blocker as we are so close to Final release of
> Fedora 26 and this definitely seems like a blocker to me. A working
> Wayland session is a requirement
On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 14:50 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On 07/04/2017 03:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 09:32 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
> > > > Looks like one compose failed *again* for some mirror issue… This ti
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> So... this prompts a question in my head. I understand we don't block
> release for non-blocking spins. That is obvious.
>
> What is not obvious to me is if we would go back and do a compose
> later for those spins that are impacted by this.
I have gone ahead and filed a bug for this (Bug ID: 1468029) and proposed it
as final blocker as we are so close to Final release of Fedora 26 and this
definitely seems like a blocker to me. A working Wayland session is a
requirement for final release if I am not wrong.
Hi,
I am using Fedora 26 Workstation x86_64 right from the time of Alpha release,
it was upgraded from Fedora 25 Workstation using dnf system upgrade.
I don't know when it happened, but today I noticed that on using any of the two
sessions (Gnome or Gnome on X) from GDM, I always get an X sessi
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 07/04/2017 03:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 09:32 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
>>> Looks like one compose failed *again* for some mirror issue… This time
>>> it is Robotic [1] , but i've seen these random failures s
Hi folks! Just wanted to send out a roll-up mail with some specific
requests for testing related to the Fedora 26 release.
1. There's a new qemu build which should fix the proposed blocker
#1467599 . It would be great if anyone who runs F26 and uses virt-
manager, Boxes or qemu in any other way co
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
The two webkitgtk packages are dead in F27.
Not that it matters at all, but those old WebKitGTK+ packages would
automagically build without CairoGL if it's not present. In modern
WebKitGTK+ it has to be requested explicitly.
Does this s
I just submitted python-slackclient:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467995
Willing to do one of yours.
Thanks!
-G
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Apologies that this is just after the system-wide change deadline
(thanks for putting that on a holiday btw), but I hadn't had a chance
to dig into this before now and I think it's fairly low impact.
Cairo's OpenGL backend is not especially well maintained or widely
used, and cairo gets linked int
On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 15:58 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 15:52 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On 07/03/2017 03:12 PM, Michal Schorm wrote:
> > > Hello everybody!
> > >
> > > Since MariaDB 10.2 is finally stable and I resolved all issues
> > > that
> > > blocked it for Fedo
Am 05.07.2017 um 15:25 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser:
Am 05.07.2017 um 13:28 schrieb David Demelier:
Hello,
There is a major issue in tortoisehg 4.2 which makes most of the
software unusable [0][1].
It would be nice to have 4.2.1 in Fedora 26 as it's a small bugfix
release.
Is there an
Am 05.07.2017 um 13:28 schrieb David Demelier:
Hello,
There is a major issue in tortoisehg 4.2 which makes most of the
software unusable [0][1].
It would be nice to have 4.2.1 in Fedora 26 as it's a small bugfix
release.
Is there any chance that we get into it before the release or quickly
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 01:57:22PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 05.07.2017 um 13:39 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
> >On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 07:34:27AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >>On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Richard W.M. Jones
> >>wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 03:12:13PM +0200,
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 07:34:27AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 03:12:13PM +0200, Michal Schorm wrote:
>> >> Hello everybody!
>> >>
>> >> Since MariaDB
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 07:34:27AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 03:12:13PM +0200, Michal Schorm wrote:
> >> Hello everybody!
> >>
> >> Since MariaDB 10.2 is finally stable and I resolved all issues that blocked
> >
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 03:12:13PM +0200, Michal Schorm wrote:
>> Hello everybody!
>>
>> Since MariaDB 10.2 is finally stable and I resolved all issues that blocked
>> it for Fedora, I'd like to propose an update for Rawhide.
>
> Are we a
On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 03:12:13PM +0200, Michal Schorm wrote:
> Hello everybody!
>
> Since MariaDB 10.2 is finally stable and I resolved all issues that blocked
> it for Fedora, I'd like to propose an update for Rawhide.
Are we also going to package MySQL? And if so, will that mean that
package
Hello,
There is a major issue in tortoisehg 4.2 which makes most of the
software unusable [0][1].
It would be nice to have 4.2.1 in Fedora 26 as it's a small bugfix release.
Is there any chance that we get into it before the release or quickly
after? :-)
[0]
https://bitbucket.org/tortoise
Thanks Nicolas,
I just saw that F25 and later had got the Unicode 9 update, so I'll do
the same with this one. I will push it later today or on Friday, after
I have verified and amended the font coverage details.
Best regards,
Alex
___
devel mailing lis
Hi,
I'm quite sure deploying a font that supports a newer unicode revision than the
base system is ok. The various font utilises won't know to look for new glyphs
and gucharmap won't show pretty name for those glyphs, that's all.
That may cause some codepoints to be deprecated earlier than the
Hello all,
I am going to update the gdouros-symbola font to the newest version,
which contains Unicode 10 glyphs. I have kind of lost track of things,
so I would like to ask if there is a fedora release that shouldn't or
wouldn't make sense to get the update?
Thanks,
Alex
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 11:41 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 07/04/2017 03:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 09:32 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote:
>>> Looks like one compose failed *again* for some mirror issue… This time
>>> it is Robotic [1] , but i've seen these random failures
31 matches
Mail list logo
